Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FUSE vs BBAI vs PLTR vs AIOT vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
Software - Infrastructure
FUSE vs BBAI vs PLTR vs AIOT vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $37M | $19.87B | $310.56B | $523M | $3.10T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $127M | $5.22B | $436M | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $262K | $-289M | $2.28B | $-32M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 25.8% | 84.1% | 55.2% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -89.5% | -68.3% | 38.1% | 1.7% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 93.0x | — | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $24M | $229M | $287M | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $87M | $1.42B | $49M | $30.24B |
FUSE vs BBAI vs PLTR vs AIOT vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 278.1 | +178.1% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 100 | 535.1 | +435.1% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUSE vs BBAI vs PLTR vs AIOT vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUSE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PLTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 13.3% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.82, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 7.11x
- 43.7% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- +13.0% vs FUSE's -89.1%
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
- 19.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MSFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.86, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.86 vs BBAI's 3.52
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.7% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs BBAI's 3.52 | |
| Dividends | 19.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.0% vs FUSE's -89.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.4% ROA vs BBAI's -35.3%, ROIC 22.3% vs -19.5% |
FUSE vs BBAI vs PLTR vs AIOT vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FUSE vs BBAI vs PLTR vs AIOT vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSFT leads 2 • FUSE leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • AIOT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 33177.6x FUSE's $10M. PLTR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, PLTR holds the edge at +84.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $127M | $5.2B | $436M | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$75M | $2.0B | $69M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $261,897 | -$289M | $2.3B | -$32M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$56M | $2.7B | $3M | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +25.8% | +84.1% | +55.2% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -89.5% | -68.3% | +38.1% | +1.7% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -2.3% | +43.7% | -7.4% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -82.3% | -44.3% | +51.5% | +0.6% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -0.9% | +84.7% | +47.4% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +52.0% | +3.1% | -25.5% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.5x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 86% valuation discount to PLTR's 215.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSFT's 19.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLTR's 214.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $19.9B | $310.6B | $523M | $3.10T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $19.8B | $309.4B | $761M | $3.18T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.90x | -5.12x | 215.13x | -8.93x | 30.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 92.99x | — | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 214.82x | 47.93x | 19.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.80x | 155.62x | 69.39x | 1.44x | 10.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 24.63x | 46.43x | 1.03x | 9.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 147.85x | — | 43.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PLTR and MSFT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. PLTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLTR scores 8/9 vs FUSE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -50.7% | +31.7% | -6.6% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -35.3% | +26.4% | -3.4% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -19.5% | +22.3% | -4.3% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -19.6% | +21.6% | -5.1% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.03x | 0.64x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$63M | -$1.2B | $238M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $87M | $1.4B | $49M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $24M | $229M | $287M | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.49x | -18.17x | — | 0.47x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth $55,409 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,314 for FUSE. Over the past 12 months, PLTR leads with a +13.0% total return vs FUSE's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLTR at 107.2% vs FUSE's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | -28.1% | -19.3% | -26.9% | -11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.1% | +11.4% | +13.0% | -16.7% | -10.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | +110.0% | +789.3% | -19.5% | +26.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -57.2% | +454.1% | -19.5% | +70.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -57.3% | +1326.6% | -19.5% | +745.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.4% | +28.1% | +107.2% | -7.0% | +8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs FUSE's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 3.52x | 1.82x | 2.69x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $9.39 | $207.52 | $5.88 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $3.01 | $118.93 | $2.77 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.1% | +44.7% | +65.3% | +65.3% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 58.4 | 49.8 | 73.9 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 38.3M | 42.1M | 1.5M | 33.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIOT and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", PLTR as "Buy", AIOT as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.3% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 32.5% for MSFT (target: $552). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 19.62% vs MSFT's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $187.69 | $8.00 | $551.96 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 26 | 5 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +19.6% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.75 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.5% | +0.6% |
PLTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MSFT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
FUSE vs BBAI vs PLTR vs AIOT vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger pick with 56. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
5x versus Palantir Technologies Inc. at 215. 1x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) delivered a total return of +454. 1%, compared to -86. 9% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLTR returned +1327% versus FUSE's -86. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 52β — meaning BBAI is approximately 308% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 64% for PowerFleet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is pulling ahead at 56. 2% versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palantir Technologies Inc. grew EPS 231. 6% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT?
Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 3% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -77. 2% for FUSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTR leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 24.
8x forward P/E versus 93. 0x for Palantir Technologies Inc. — 68. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIOT: 108. 3% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT?
In this comparison, AIOT (19.
6% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FUSE, BBAI, PLTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FUSE or BBAI or PLTR or AIOT or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 0. 8% yield, +745. 5% 10Y return). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +745. 5%, BBAI: -57. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUSE and BBAI and PLTR and AIOT and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FUSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PLTR is a large-cap high-growth stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT, MSFT pay a dividend while FUSE, BBAI, PLTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.