Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FVRR vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs META vs MSFT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • IL
Market Cap$422M
5Y Perf.-82.0%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+455.2%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.56T
5Y Perf.+174.0%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.13T
5Y Perf.+129.7%

FVRR vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs META vs MSFT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FVRR logoFVRR
NFLX logoNFLX
GOOGL logoGOOGL
META logoMETA
MSFT logoMSFT
IndustryInternet Content & InformationEntertainmentInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & InformationSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$422M$374.00B$4.81T$1.56T$3.13T
Revenue (TTM)$429M$45.18B$422.57B$214.96B$318.27B
Net Income (TTM)$29M$10.98B$160.21B$70.59B$125.22B
Gross Margin81.3%48.5%60.4%81.9%68.3%
Operating Margin2.9%29.5%32.7%41.2%46.8%
Forward P/E5.7x24.8x29.6x20.4x25.3x
Total Debt$5M$14.46B$59.29B$83.90B$112.18B
Cash & Equiv.$129M$9.03B$30.71B$35.87B$30.24B

FVRR vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs META vs MSFTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FVRR
NFLX
GOOGL
META
MSFT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR)10018.0-82.0%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100555.2+455.2%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)100274.0+174.0%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)100229.7+129.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FVRR vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs META vs MSFT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOOGL and MSFT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Microsoft Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. FVRR, NFLX, and META also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

FVRR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
  • Lower P/E (5.7x vs 25.3x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Growth Play

NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • PEG 0.75 vs MSFT's 1.35
  • Beta 0.39 vs META's 1.59
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GOOGL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.

  • 10.0% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
  • +163.5% vs FVRR's -59.7%
  • 27.4% ROA vs FVRR's 3.1%, ROIC 25.1% vs -0.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
The Growth Leader

META is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 22.2% revenue growth vs FVRR's 10.1%
Best for: growth
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
  • Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
  • 39.3% margin vs FVRR's 6.7%
  • 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMETA logoMETA22.2% revenue growth vs FVRR's 10.1%
ValueFVRR logoFVRRLower P/E (5.7x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs FVRR's 6.7%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs META's 1.59
DividendsMSFT logoMSFT0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+163.5% vs FVRR's -59.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GOOGL logoGOOGL27.4% ROA vs FVRR's 3.1%, ROIC 25.1% vs -0.2%

FVRR vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs META vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FVRRFiverr International Ltd.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
69.0%$297M
Services Revenue
31.0%$133M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Family of Apps
98.9%$198.8B
Reality Labs
1.1%$2.2B
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B

FVRR vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs META vs MSFT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFVRRLAGGINGMETA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FVRR and META and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 984.5x FVRR's $429M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FVRR's 6.7%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$429M$45.2B$422.6B$215.0B$318.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26M$30.1B$161.3B$109.3B$192.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$29M$11.0B$160.2B$70.6B$125.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$103M$9.5B$73.3B$48.3B$72.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.3%+48.5%+60.4%+81.9%+68.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.9%+29.5%+32.7%+41.2%+46.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.7%+24.3%+37.9%+32.8%+39.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.1%+20.9%+17.3%+22.4%+22.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.6%+17.6%+21.8%+33.1%+18.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%+31.1%+81.9%+62.4%+23.4%
Evenly matched — FVRR and META and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FVRR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 21.0x trailing earnings, FVRR trades at a 43% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$422M$374.0B$4.81T$1.56T$3.13T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$299M$379.4B$4.84T$1.61T$3.21T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.98x34.89x36.82x26.26x30.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.68x24.80x29.61x20.36x25.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x1.23x1.43x1.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.11x12.61x32.22x15.81x19.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.98x8.28x11.95x7.78x11.10x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.06x14.32x11.72x7.31x9.15x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.06x39.53x65.72x33.90x43.66x
FVRR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FVRR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for FVRR. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.0%+41.3%+39.0%+33.2%+33.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.1%+19.8%+27.4%+20.8%+19.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.2%+29.8%+25.1%+27.6%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.3%+30.5%+30.3%+29.4%+29.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.54x0.14x0.39x0.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$124M$5.4B$28.6B$48.0B$81.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$129M$9.0B$30.7B$35.9B$30.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$14.5B$59.3B$83.9B$112.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.33x392.15x78.84x55.65x
FVRR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $652 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs FVRR's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-40.3%-3.0%+26.4%-5.1%-10.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-59.7%-23.6%+163.5%+3.7%-2.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-58.1%+166.5%+270.8%+166.4%+39.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.5%+75.2%+239.8%+94.8%+72.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.6%+875.3%+996.1%+421.2%+787.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-25.2%+38.6%+54.8%+38.6%+11.7%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.97x0.39x1.26x1.59x0.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$34.13$134.12$400.10$796.25$555.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.67$75.01$147.84$520.26$356.28
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.4%+65.8%+99.5%+77.5%+75.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.935.383.442.854.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded924K44.0M28.3M15.6M32.5M
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FVRR as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", META as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.2% upside for FVRR (target: $17) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.

MetricFVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.83$116.29$406.28$821.80$551.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts1799826081
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.3%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2219
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82$2.07$3.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.7%+2.4%+0.9%+1.7%+0.6%
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FVRR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GOOGL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallFiverr International Ltd. (FVRR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FVRR vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs META vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (5. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT?

On trailing P/E, Fiverr International Ltd.

(FVRR) is the cheapest at 21. 0x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Fiverr International Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -93. 5% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus FVRR's -70. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning META is approximately 310% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus 10. 1% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus 4. 9% for Fiverr International Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -0. 3% for FVRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 23. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FVRR: 43. 2% to $16. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT?

In this comparison, MSFT (0.

8% yield), META (0. 3% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FVRR, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FVRR or NFLX or GOOGL or META or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, META: +421. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FVRR and NFLX and GOOGL and META and MSFT?

These companies operate in different sectors (FVRR (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and META (Communication Services) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while FVRR, NFLX, GOOGL, META do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FVRR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

META

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSFT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FVRR and NFLX and GOOGL and META and MSFT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FVRR: -1.6% · NFLX: 17.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(FVRR: 6.7% · NFLX: 24.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FVRR: 21.0x · NFLX: 34.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.