Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FVRR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Information Technology Services
FVRR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Information Technology Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $412M | $581M | $1.15B | $4.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $429M | $1.21B | $595M | $2.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $105M | $109M | $252M |
| Gross Margin | 81.3% | 35.5% | 103.0% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 11.6% | 20.7% | 15.2% |
| Forward P/E | 5.6x | 4.9x | 6.1x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $298M | $381M | $404M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129M | $212M | $298M | $146M |
FVRR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 15.1 | -84.9% |
| ExlService Holdings… (EXLS) | 100 | 146.3 | +46.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FVRR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FVRR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TASK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- PEG 0.20 vs EXLS's 0.57
- 19.0% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (4.9x vs 13.9x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.57
UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 18.3% margin vs FVRR's 6.7%
EXLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64
- 218.8% 10Y total return vs UPWK's -58.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 2.56x
- Beta 0.64, current ratio 2.56x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.9x vs 13.9x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.3% margin vs FVRR's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs TASK's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -29.8% vs FVRR's -61.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs FVRR's 3.1%, ROIC 20.4% vs -0.2% |
FVRR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FVRR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
UPWK leads 1 • TASK leads 1 • FVRR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 5.0x FVRR's $429M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FVRR's 6.7%. On growth, EXLS holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $429M | $1.2B | $595M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $204M | $150M | $410M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $105M | $109M | $252M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $103M | $88M | $224M | $297M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.3% | +35.5% | +103.0% | +38.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +11.6% | +20.7% | +15.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +8.7% | +18.3% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +7.3% | +37.7% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.6% | +10.3% | -100.0% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +13.0% | -11.1% | +7.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TASK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 71% valuation discount to FVRR's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs EXLS's 0.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $412M | $581M | $1.1B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $288M | $667M | $1.2B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.45x | 5.86x | 10.63x | 20.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.59x | 4.89x | 6.12x | 13.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.23x | — | 0.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.31x | 3.30x | 8.12x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.96x | 0.49x | 1.46x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.00x | 1.95x | 5.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.96x | 7.89x | 4.74x | 16.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FVRR and EXLS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXLS delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $7 for FVRR. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPWK's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs UPWK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +21.2% | +17.9% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +10.3% | +8.5% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +16.3% | +14.3% | +20.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +16.7% | +16.2% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.50x | 0.60x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$124M | $86M | $83M | $257M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $212M | $298M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $298M | $381M | $404M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.12x | 146.13x | 11.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TASK and UPWK and EXLS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXLS five years ago would be worth $15,849 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $685 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, TASK leads with a -29.8% total return vs FVRR's -61.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPWK at 3.1% vs FVRR's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.8% | -11.6% | -55.5% | -24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.2% | -29.8% | -46.4% | -31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.2% | -17.5% | +9.7% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -67.5% | -76.9% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | -67.5% | -58.4% | +218.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.8% | -6.2% | +3.1% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
EXLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TASK's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXLS currently trades 64.0% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 33.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 1.23x | 1.12x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.13 | $18.39 | $22.84 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.67 | $5.89 | $7.44 | $26.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.5% | +35.0% | +38.6% | +64.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 37.6 | 45.1 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 890K | 700K | 3.8M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
EXLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FVRR as "Hold", TASK as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy", EXLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.9% upside for UPWK (target: $16) vs 29.5% for EXLS (target: $40).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.83 | $10.50 | $16.13 | $40.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 11 | 23 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.9% | +4.8% | +11.8% | +6.8% |
EXLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). UPWK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FVRR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus Fiverr International Ltd. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) delivered a total return of +58. 5%, compared to -93. 2% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +218. 8% versus FVRR's -71. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus TaskUs, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning TASK is approximately 91% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 60% for Upwork Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXLS leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus 4. 9% for Fiverr International Ltd. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -0. 3% for FVRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FVRR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) trades at 4. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 82. 9% to $16. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FVRR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), +218. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXLS: +218. 8%, TASK: -67. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FVRR and TASK and UPWK and EXLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FVRR (Communication Services) and TASK (Technology) and UPWK (Industrials) and EXLS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.