Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GANX vs PRAX vs ACMR vs RARE vs FOLD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GANX
Gain Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$67M
5Y Perf.-87.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.63B
5Y Perf.-32.2%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+119.8%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-77.1%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+46.4%

GANX vs PRAX vs ACMR vs RARE vs FOLD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GANX logoGANX
PRAX logoPRAX
ACMR logoACMR
RARE logoRARE
FOLD logoFOLD
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologySemiconductorsBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$67M$9.63B$3.92B$2.57B$4.55B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$-92K$901M$669M$634M
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$-327M$94M$-609M$-27M
Gross Margin44.4%83.6%87.9%
Operating Margin12.1%-83.9%5.2%
Forward P/E29.7x40.6x
Total Debt$653K$110K$303M$1.28B$483M
Cash & Equiv.$10M$357M$766M$434M$214M

GANX vs PRAX vs ACMR vs RARE vs FOLDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GANX
PRAX
ACMR
RARE
FOLD
StockMar 21May 26Return
Gain Therapeutics, … (GANX)10012.5-87.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10067.8-32.2%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100219.8+119.8%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10022.9-77.1%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100146.4+46.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GANX vs PRAX vs ACMR vs RARE vs FOLD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. RARE and FOLD also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GANX
Gain Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, GANX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • +7.7% vs RARE's -21.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
  • Lower P/E (29.7x vs 40.6x)
  • 10.4% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
  • 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Income Pick

RARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.42
  • 20.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

FOLD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 51.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
  • Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
  • Beta 0.63 vs ACMR's 3.24
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRARE logoRARE20.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueACMR logoACMRLower P/E (29.7x vs 40.6x)
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR10.4% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.63 vs ACMR's 3.24
DividendsACMR logoACMR0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs RARE's -21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ACMR logoACMR3.9% ROA vs GANX's -176.7%

GANX vs PRAX vs ACMR vs RARE vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GANXGain Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GANX vs PRAX vs ACMR vs RARE vs FOLD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACMRLAGGINGRARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FOLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACMR and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $901M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGANX logoGANXGain Therapeutics…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0-$92,000$901M$669M$634M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$18M-$357M$126M-$536M$40M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M-$327M$94M-$609M-$27M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$17M-$283M-$69M-$487M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.4%+83.6%+87.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.1%-83.9%+5.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.4%-91.0%-4.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.6%-72.8%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.4%-2.4%+23.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.2%+2.7%-76.1%-17.2%-89.0%
FOLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ACMR's 27.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricGANX logoGANXGain Therapeutics…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$67M$9.6B$3.9B$2.6B$4.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$58M$9.3B$3.5B$3.4B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.10x-24.72x43.21x-4.48x-164.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.68x40.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.49x114.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.35x3.82x7.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.83x8.54x2.06x16.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF152.43x
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACMR delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RARE scores 4/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricGANX logoGANXGain Therapeutics…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.3%-43.0%+6.1%-6.1%-12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-176.7%-40.2%+3.9%-45.8%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-65.0%+7.0%-89.4%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-186.1%-49.3%+6.6%-46.4%+5.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–923244
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x0.00x0.16x1.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$10M-$357M-$463M$842M$269M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$357M$766M$434M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$653,015$110,000$303M$1.3B$483M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense20.44x-14.49x1.00x
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — PRAX and ACMR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,781 for GANX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs GANX's -29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGANX logoGANXGain Therapeutics…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-41.2%+16.4%+31.9%+10.7%+1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-4.1%+775.0%+195.6%-21.8%+137.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.8%+1976.5%+487.9%-44.5%+19.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.2%-20.8%+133.4%-77.2%+48.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.3%-20.1%+3065.8%-59.4%+119.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-29.4%+174.9%+80.5%-17.8%+6.0%
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACMR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs GANX's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGANX logoGANXGain Therapeutics…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.46x1.55x3.24x1.42x0.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.34$356.00$71.65$42.37$14.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.41$35.18$19.26$18.29$5.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+43.1%+93.6%+82.6%+61.7%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.255.660.766.672.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded640K378K1.2M1.8M3.0M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GANX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 345.5% upside for GANX (target: $8) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGANX logoGANXGain Therapeutics…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.33$544.40$40.00$51.50$14.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts816103324
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises31
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ACMR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FOLD leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GANX vs PRAX vs ACMR vs RARE vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (GANX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD?

On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -82. 2% for Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (GANX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus GANX's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 413% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD?

ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOLD leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GANX: 345. 5% to $8. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD?

In this comparison, ACMR (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. GANX, PRAX, RARE, FOLD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GANX or PRAX or ACMR or RARE or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GANX and PRAX and ACMR and RARE and FOLD?

These companies operate in different sectors (GANX (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and RARE (Healthcare) and FOLD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GANX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GANX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GANX and PRAX and ACMR and RARE and FOLD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GANX: -100.0% · PRAX: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.