Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GBIO vs ARWR vs RCKT vs RARE vs FOLD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GBIO
Generation Bio Co.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$36M
5Y Perf.-97.5%
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.18B
5Y Perf.+60.5%
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$396M
5Y Perf.-83.4%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-69.2%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.-5.2%

GBIO vs ARWR vs RCKT vs RARE vs FOLD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GBIO logoGBIO
ARWR logoARWR
RCKT logoRCKT
RARE logoRARE
FOLD logoFOLD
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$36M$10.18B$396M$2.57B$4.55B
Revenue (TTM)$15M$622M$0.00$669M$634M
Net Income (TTM)$-63M$-301M$-209M$-609M$-27M
Gross Margin90.8%88.1%83.6%87.9%
Operating Margin-5.5%-35.7%-83.9%5.2%
Forward P/E40.6x
Total Debt$94M$366M$25M$1.28B$483M
Cash & Equiv.$76M$227M$78M$434M$214M

GBIO vs ARWR vs RCKT vs RARE vs FOLDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GBIO
ARWR
RCKT
RARE
FOLD
StockJun 20Feb 26Return
Generation Bio Co. (GBIO)1002.5-97.5%
Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR)100160.5+60.5%
Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT)10016.6-83.4%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10030.8-69.2%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)10094.8-5.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GBIO vs ARWR vs RCKT vs RARE vs FOLD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARWR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. RCKT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GBIO
Generation Bio Co.
The Growth Angle

GBIO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
  • 11.6% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
  • 232.6% revenue growth vs RCKT's 19.7%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

RCKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 6.38x
  • Beta 1.21, current ratio 6.38x
  • 2.6% margin vs GBIO's -410.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 0.61
  • Beta 0.61 vs ARWR's 1.74
  • -3.2% ROA vs RCKT's -59.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs -62.4%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARWR logoARWR232.6% revenue growth vs RCKT's 19.7%
ValueARWR logoARWRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsRCKT logoRCKT2.6% margin vs GBIO's -410.1%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.61 vs ARWR's 1.74
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARWR logoARWR+448.5% vs RCKT's -48.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FOLD logoFOLD-3.2% ROA vs RCKT's -59.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs -62.4%

GBIO vs ARWR vs RCKT vs RARE vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GBIOGeneration Bio Co.
FY 2024
One Reportable Segment
100.0%$20M
ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCKTRocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GBIO vs ARWR vs RCKT vs RARE vs FOLD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARWRLAGGINGRARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FOLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

RARE and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.3% (FOLD) to -4.1% (GBIO). On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGBIO logoGBIOGeneration Bio Co.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15M$622M$0$669M$634M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$80M-$203M-$208M-$536M$40M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$63M-$301M-$209M-$609M-$27M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$115M-$51M-$180M-$487M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.8%+88.1%+83.6%+87.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.5%-35.7%-83.9%+5.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.1%-48.4%-91.0%-4.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.5%-8.2%-72.8%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-78.9%-86.4%-2.4%+23.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+64.2%-133.8%+25.0%-17.2%-89.0%
FOLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ARWR's 84.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricGBIO logoGBIOGeneration Bio Co.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$36M$10.2B$396M$2.6B$4.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$53M$10.3B$343M$3.4B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.27x-5957.38x-1.81x-4.48x-164.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple84.38x114.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.81x12.27x3.82x7.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.41x19.31x1.46x16.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF64.87x152.43x
ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ARWR and RCKT and FOLD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FOLD delivers a -12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. RCKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGBIO logoGBIOGeneration Bio Co.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-94.8%-55.5%-70.8%-6.1%-12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-34.1%-18.1%-59.6%-45.8%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-63.2%+9.3%-62.4%-89.4%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-53.6%+8.8%-58.1%-46.4%+5.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926144
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.09x0.73x0.09x1.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$17M$140M-$53M$842M$269M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$76M$227M$78M$434M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$94M$366M$25M$1.3B$483M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.03x-41.65x-14.49x1.00x
Evenly matched — ARWR and RCKT and FOLD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $15,431 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $177 for GBIO. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +448.5% total return vs RCKT's -48.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 21.6% vs GBIO's -51.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGBIO logoGBIOGeneration Bio Co.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.9%+7.2%+4.9%+10.7%+1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+48.3%+448.5%-48.4%-27.4%+138.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.6%+79.7%-83.0%-44.5%+19.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.2%+10.0%-91.6%-76.1%+54.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.8%+1161.8%-91.4%-59.4%+119.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-51.5%+21.6%-44.6%-17.8%+6.0%
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARWR's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGBIO logoGBIOGeneration Bio Co.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.66x1.74x1.21x1.36x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.95$79.48$7.39$42.37$14.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.00$12.44$2.19$18.29$5.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.8%+91.4%+49.1%+61.6%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.266.348.467.772.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded01.9M3.5M1.8M2.9M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ARWR as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricGBIO logoGBIOGeneration Bio Co.ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$82.33$5.00$48.36$14.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts20193324
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FOLD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ARWR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, … (ARWR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GBIO vs ARWR vs RCKT vs RARE vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GBIO or ARWR or RCKT or RARE or FOLD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). Analysts rate Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARWR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GBIO or ARWR or RCKT or RARE or FOLD?

Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) delivered a total return of +54. 3%, compared to -98. 2% for Generation Bio Co. (GBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1162% versus GBIO's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GBIO or ARWR or RCKT or RARE or FOLD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning ARWR is approximately 184% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GBIO or ARWR or RCKT or RARE or FOLD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -0. 7% for Generation Bio Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARWR leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GBIO or ARWR or RCKT or RARE or FOLD?

Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(RCKT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -661. 9% for Generation Bio Co. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus -715. 8% for GBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is GBIO or ARWR or RCKT or RARE or FOLD more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 85.

1% to $48. 36.

07

Which pays a better dividend — GBIO or ARWR or RCKT or RARE or FOLD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is GBIO or ARWR or RCKT or RARE or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), +119. 2% 10Y return). Generation Bio Co. (GBIO) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, GBIO: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between GBIO and ARWR and RCKT and RARE and FOLD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GBIO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCKT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GBIO and ARWR and RCKT and RARE and FOLD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GBIO: -78.9% · ARWR: -86.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.