Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $408M | $697M | $2.35B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $133M | $378M | $867M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $75M | $169M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 61.7% | 72.1% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 24.2% | 25.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 8.9x | 10.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $128M | $334M | $327M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $185M | $109M | $185M | $119M |
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greene County Banco… (GCBC) | 100 | 217.7 | +117.7% |
| Financial Instituti… (FISI) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GCBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 198.9% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5%
FISI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 43.1%, EPS growth 231.3%
- PEG 0.94 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 3.2% vs GCBC's 2.0%
- 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FISI's 1.01, lower leverage
- +45.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 13.1x), PEG 0.94 vs 1.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FISI's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FISI leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • GCBC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GCBC and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. GCBC is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $133M | $378M | $867M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $42M | $97M | $241M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $75M | $169M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | $16M | $225M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.7% | +61.7% | +72.1% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +24.2% | +25.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +19.8% | +19.5% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +3.6% | +25.2% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +118.9% | +39.5% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FISI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, FISI trades at a 32% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISI offers better value at 1.04x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $408M | $697M | $2.4B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $352M | $923M | $2.5B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.11x | 9.81x | 13.53x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.87x | 10.80x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.22x | 1.04x | 1.92x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.85x | 10.10x | 10.35x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.07x | 1.84x | 2.71x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.71x | 1.14x | 1.21x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.97x | 51.25x | 10.75x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GCBC delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCBC's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GCBC scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.0% | +12.3% | +9.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +7.7% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +2.6% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.53x | 0.17x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$56M | $225M | $142M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $185M | $109M | $185M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $128M | $334M | $327M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.74x | 0.69x | 1.05x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GCBC five years ago would be worth $19,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,681 for FISI. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs GCBC's 11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.7% | +15.9% | +9.3% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | +42.4% | +9.0% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +146.3% | +54.1% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.6% | +26.8% | +29.9% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.9% | +67.9% | +102.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.1% | +35.1% | +15.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FISI and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISI's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FISI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs GCBC's 92.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.01x | 0.89x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.04 | $35.66 | $46.92 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.16 | $24.41 | $39.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +99.3% | +96.1% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 62.8 | 57.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 112K | 236K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FISI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FISI as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs 1.7% for FISI (target: $36). For income investors, FISI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.44% vs GCBC's 1.10%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 | $46.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $1.22 | $1.43 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.4% | +3.1% |
FISI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NBTB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GCBC vs FISI vs NBTB vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the stronger pick with 43. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Financial Institutions, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Greene County Bancorp, Inc.
(GCBC) delivered a total return of +97. 6%, compared to +26. 8% for Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GCBC returned +198. 9% versus FISI's +67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Financial Institutions, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning FISI is approximately 119% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 54% for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is pulling ahead at 43. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Financial Institutions, Inc. grew EPS 231. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI?
Greene County Bancorp, Inc.
(GCBC) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 4% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GCBC leads at 26. 1% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 1. 1% for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC).
09Is GCBC or FISI or NBTB or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, FISI: +67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GCBC and FISI and NBTB and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GCBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.