Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GCL vs TASK vs EXLS vs IBEX vs EPAM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GCL
GCL Global Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-91.9%
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$573M
5Y Perf.-61.3%
EXLS
ExlService Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.90B
5Y Perf.-37.6%
IBEX
IBEX Limited

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$441M
5Y Perf.+48.8%
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.51B
5Y Perf.-58.9%

GCL vs TASK vs EXLS vs IBEX vs EPAM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GCL logoGCL
TASK logoTASK
EXLS logoEXLS
IBEX logoIBEX
EPAM logoEPAM
IndustryElectronic Gaming & MultimediaInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$3M$573M$4.90B$441M$5.51B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$1.21B$2.16B$627M$5.56B
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$105M$252M$47M$387M
Gross Margin15.0%35.5%38.5%21.3%28.5%
Operating Margin2.3%11.6%15.2%9.2%9.9%
Forward P/E4.6x14.1x9.6x8.2x
Total Debt$13M$298M$404M$70M$144M
Cash & Equiv.$18M$212M$146M$15M$1.30B

GCL vs TASK vs EXLS vs IBEX vs EPAMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GCL
TASK
EXLS
IBEX
EPAM
StockJan 25May 26Return
GCL Global Holdings… (GCL)1008.1-91.9%
TaskUs, Inc. (TASK)10038.7-61.3%
ExlService Holdings… (EXLS)10062.4-37.6%
IBEX Limited (IBEX)100148.8+48.8%
EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM)10041.1-58.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GCL vs TASK vs EXLS vs IBEX vs EPAM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TASK and EXLS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. ExlService Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. IBEX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GCL
GCL Global Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares
The Technology Pick

GCL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.
The Growth Play

TASK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
  • PEG 0.18 vs EPAM's 0.70
  • 19.0% revenue growth vs GCL's -51.7%
  • Lower P/E (4.6x vs 8.2x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.70
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
EXLS
ExlService Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

EXLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 221.4% 10Y total return vs IBEX's 112.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 2.56x
  • Beta 0.67, current ratio 2.56x
  • 11.7% margin vs GCL's 3.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
IBEX
IBEX Limited
The Income Pick

IBEX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.80
  • +29.9% vs GCL's -80.8%
  • 16.4% ROA vs GCL's -5.6%, ROIC 19.5% vs 10.9%
Best for: income & stability
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, EPAM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTASK logoTASK19.0% revenue growth vs GCL's -51.7%
ValueTASK logoTASKLower P/E (4.6x vs 8.2x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.70
Quality / MarginsEXLS logoEXLS11.7% margin vs GCL's 3.9%
Stability / SafetyEXLS logoEXLSBeta 0.67 vs EPAM's 1.21
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IBEX logoIBEX+29.9% vs GCL's -80.8%
Efficiency (ROA)IBEX logoIBEX16.4% ROA vs GCL's -5.6%, ROIC 19.5% vs 10.9%

GCL vs TASK vs EXLS vs IBEX vs EPAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GCLGCL Global Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares
FY 2025
Corporate Segment
99.6%$150M
Other Member
0.4%$541,156
TASKTaskUs, Inc.
FY 2025
Digital Customer Experience
75.5%$662M
AI Services
24.5%$214M
EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Digital Operations And Solutions Services
56.7%$1.0B
Analytics Services
43.3%$796M
IBEXIBEX Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

EPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Services Sector
35.5%$1.3B
Other Sectors
25.4%$940M
Software And Hi-Tech Sector
22.2%$822M
Healthcare Sector
16.9%$626M

GCL vs TASK vs EXLS vs IBEX vs EPAM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBEXLAGGINGEPAM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

EPAM and GCL operate at a comparable scale, with $5.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. EXLS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GCL's 3.9%. On growth, IBEX holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGCL logoGCLGCL Global Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…IBEX logoIBEXIBEX LimitedEPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$1.2B$2.2B$627M$5.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$771,873$204M$410M$76M$684M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M$105M$252M$47M$387M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$663,410$88M$297M$32M$544M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+15.0%+35.5%+38.5%+21.3%+28.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.3%+11.6%+15.2%+9.2%+9.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.9%+8.7%+11.7%+7.5%+7.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.4%+7.3%+13.8%+5.2%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.3%+13.8%+16.8%+7.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+41.2%+13.0%+7.5%+21.9%+18.8%
EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GCL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 72% valuation discount to EXLS's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs EPAM's 4.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGCL logoGCLGCL Global Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…IBEX logoIBEXIBEX LimitedEPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3M$573M$4.9B$441M$5.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$2M$660M$5.2B$496M$4.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.64x5.79x20.35x13.88x15.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.58x14.09x9.59x8.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.23x0.84x0.35x4.18x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-0.41x3.26x13.84x7.76x6.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x0.48x2.35x0.79x1.01x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.07x0.99x5.58x3.84x1.60x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.78x16.44x16.16x8.99x
GCL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBEX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBEX delivers a 31.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-10 for GCL. EPAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBEX's 0.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TASK scores 7/9 vs GCL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGCL logoGCLGCL Global Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…IBEX logoIBEXIBEX LimitedEPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.6%+21.2%+27.2%+31.8%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.6%+10.3%+14.8%+16.4%+8.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.9%+16.3%+20.4%+19.5%+15.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.8%+16.7%+23.2%+22.4%+13.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x0.50x0.44x0.52x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$86M$257M$54M-$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$18M$212M$146M$15M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$298M$404M$70M$144M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.43x7.12x11.80x62.30x
IBEX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBEX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EXLS five years ago would be worth $15,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $417 for GCL. Over the past 12 months, IBEX leads with a +29.9% total return vs GCL's -80.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBEX at 20.6% vs GCL's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGCL logoGCLGCL Global Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…IBEX logoIBEXIBEX LimitedEPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-54.7%-12.3%-24.0%-9.8%-47.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-80.8%-28.3%-31.9%+29.9%-34.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.8%-18.1%+4.3%+75.3%-55.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.8%-67.8%+60.0%+36.5%-77.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.8%-67.8%+221.4%+112.7%+48.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-65.3%-6.4%+1.4%+20.6%-23.4%
IBEX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EXLS and IBEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EXLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EPAM's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBEX currently trades 76.2% from its 52-week high vs GCL's 10.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGCL logoGCLGCL Global Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…IBEX logoIBEXIBEX LimitedEPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.17x1.12x0.67x0.80x1.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.49$18.39$48.54$42.99$222.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.45$5.89$26.94$25.00$99.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+10.6%+34.6%+64.6%+76.2%+46.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.242.048.548.522.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded75K736K2.2M117K1.3M
Evenly matched — EXLS and IBEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IBEX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TASK as "Buy", EXLS as "Buy", IBEX as "Hold", EPAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.9% upside for TASK (target: $14) vs -26.7% for IBEX (target: $24).

MetricGCL logoGCLGCL Global Holdin…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…IBEX logoIBEXIBEX LimitedEPAM logoEPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$40.25$24.00$197.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1119637
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises012
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.8%+6.7%+17.7%0.0%
IBEX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

IBEX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EXLS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallIBEX Limited (IBEX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GCL vs TASK vs EXLS vs IBEX vs EPAM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for IBEX Limited (IBEX). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM?

On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus EPAM Systems, Inc. 's 0. 70x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM?

Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) delivered a total return of +60. 0%, compared to -95. 8% for GCL Global Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares (GCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +221. 4% versus GCL's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus EPAM Systems, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning EPAM is approximately 82% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 52% for IBEX Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 9. 8% for IBEX Limited (IBEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 3% for EPAM Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GCL leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM?

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus 3. 9% for GCL Global Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXLS leads at 15. 0% versus 2. 3% for GCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXLS leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus EPAM Systems, Inc. 's 0. 70x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TASK: 111. 9% to $13. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is GCL or TASK or EXLS or IBEX or EPAM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), +221. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXLS: +221. 4%, GCL: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GCL and TASK and EXLS and IBEX and EPAM?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GCL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; EPAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GCL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TASK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXLS

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBEX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EPAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GCL and TASK and EXLS and IBEX and EPAM on the metrics below

Net Margin>
%
(GCL: 3.9% · TASK: 8.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.