Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GDOT vs DAVE vs OMF vs MOGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Infrastructure
GDOT vs DAVE vs OMF vs MOGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $716M | $3.35B | $6.52B | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.08B | $552M | $6.24B | $69M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-99M | $225M | $796M | $8M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 81.5% | 47.6% | 67.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 4.9% | 16.0% | -3.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 19.1x | 7.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $65M | $75M | $22.69B | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.42B | $81M | $914M | $9M |
GDOT vs DAVE vs OMF vs MOGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green Dot Corporati… (GDOT) | 100 | 27.6 | -72.4% |
| Dave Inc. (DAVE) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| OneMain Holdings, I… (OMF) | 100 | 97.9 | -2.1% |
| Mogo Inc. (MOGO) | 100 | 4.2 | -95.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GDOT vs DAVE vs OMF vs MOGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GDOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.13
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 7.4%, current ratio 0.52x
- Beta 1.13, current ratio 0.52x
- Beta 1.13 vs DAVE's 2.69, lower leverage
DAVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 47.5%, EPS growth 222.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.7%
- 47.5% revenue growth vs OMF's 9.1%
- 40.8% margin vs GDOT's -4.8%
- +131.2% vs MOGO's -5.5%
OMF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 189.2% 10Y total return vs DAVE's -20.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 4.7% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
MOGO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.5% revenue growth vs OMF's 9.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.8% margin vs GDOT's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs DAVE's 2.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +131.2% vs MOGO's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 49.6% ROA vs GDOT's -1.7%, ROIC 11.1% vs 4.4% |
GDOT vs DAVE vs OMF vs MOGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GDOT vs DAVE vs OMF vs MOGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories
GDOT leads 1 • OMF leads 0 • MOGO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAVE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMF is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 90.1x MOGO's $69M. DAVE is the more profitable business, keeping 40.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GDOT's -4.8%. On growth, DAVE holds the edge at +36.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $552M | $6.2B | $69M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $141M | $33M | $943M | $5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$99M | $225M | $796M | $8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $60M | $327M | $3.2B | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +81.5% | +47.6% | +67.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +4.9% | +16.0% | -3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +40.8% | +12.5% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +59.2% | +50.1% | +4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +36.7% | — | -4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +104.1% | +8.4% | +42.4% |
Valuation Metrics
GDOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, OMF trades at a 54% valuation discount to DAVE's 18.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OMF's 22.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DAVE's 69.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $716M | $3.4B | $6.5B | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$640M | $3.3B | $28.3B | $82M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.06x | 18.42x | 8.49x | -2.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.50x | 19.07x | 7.54x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -4.55x | 69.52x | 21.98x | 23.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 6.55x | 1.05x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 10.23x | 1.95x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.85x | 11.57x | 2.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAVE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAVE delivers a 84.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $85 in annual profit, vs $-11 for GDOT. GDOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OMF's 6.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMF scores 7/9 vs MOGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.8% | +84.5% | +23.6% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | +49.6% | +2.9% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +11.1% | +3.0% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +12.9% | +3.8% | -2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.21x | 6.67x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.4B | -$5M | $21.8B | $77M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $81M | $914M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $75M | $22.7B | $86M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.01x | 22.86x | 0.57x | 2.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OMF five years ago would be worth $13,644 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $426 for MOGO. Over the past 12 months, DAVE leads with a +131.2% total return vs MOGO's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAVE at 2.6% vs MOGO's -24.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | +13.6% | -17.9% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.8% | +131.2% | +22.9% | -5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.8% | +4740.2% | +87.3% | -56.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.8% | -20.2% | +36.4% | -95.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.7% | -20.5% | +189.2% | -83.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.3% | +2.6% | +23.3% | -24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GDOT and DAVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GDOT is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAVE's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAVE currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs MOGO's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 2.69x | 1.30x | 1.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.41 | $287.69 | $71.93 | $3.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.05 | $105.83 | $45.78 | $0.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +86.6% | +77.4% | +27.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.5 | 51.5 | 45.9 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 497K | 607K | 1.4M | 33K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GDOT as "Hold", DAVE as "Buy", OMF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for GDOT (target: $16) vs 24.1% for DAVE (target: $309). OMF is the only dividend payer here at 4.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.13 | $309.25 | $69.71 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 11 | 31 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +4.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.59 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +2.4% | +0.3% |
DAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GDOT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GDOT vs DAVE vs OMF vs MOGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dave Inc.
(DAVE) is the stronger pick with 47. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 1% for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dave Inc. (DAVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO?
On trailing P/E, OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Dave Inc. at 18. 4x. On forward P/E, OneMain Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO?
Over the past 5 years, OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) delivered a total return of +36. 4%, compared to -95. 7% for Mogo Inc. (MOGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OMF returned +189. 2% versus MOGO's -83. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
13β versus Dave Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning DAVE is approximately 137% more volatile than GDOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 7% for OneMain Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dave Inc.
(DAVE) is pulling ahead at 47. 5% versus 9. 1% for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dave Inc. grew EPS 222. 9% year-over-year, compared to -258. 0% for Green Dot Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, DAVE leads at 35. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO?
Dave Inc.
(DAVE) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 3% net margin versus -19. 2% for Mogo Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMF leads at 16. 0% versus -5. 2% for MOGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAVE leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Dave Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GDOT: 27. 6% to $16. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO?
In this comparison, OMF (4.
7% yield) pays a dividend. GDOT, DAVE, MOGO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GDOT or DAVE or OMF or MOGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 7% yield, +189. 2% 10Y return). Dave Inc. (DAVE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMF: +189. 2%, DAVE: -20. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GDOT and DAVE and OMF and MOGO?
These companies operate in different sectors (GDOT (Financial Services) and DAVE (Technology) and OMF (Financial Services) and MOGO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GDOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DAVE is a small-cap high-growth stock; OMF is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OMF pays a dividend while GDOT, DAVE, MOGO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.