Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GETY vs CSGP vs Z vs SSP vs TTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Internet Content & Information
Broadcasting
Software - Application
GETY vs CSGP vs Z vs SSP vs TTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services | Internet Content & Information | Broadcasting | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $346M | $14.83B | $10.57B | $552M | $11.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $981M | $3.41B | $2.69B | $2.15B | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-206M | $25M | $61M | $-101M | $433M |
| Gross Margin | 73.4% | 77.4% | 73.3% | 33.7% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | -0.8% | 0.4% | 7.5% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 592.5x | 25.8x | 19.7x | 18.7x | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $720M | $1.14B | $536M | $2.73B | $436M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $1.73B | $773M | $28M | $658M |
GETY vs CSGP vs Z vs SSP vs TTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Getty Images Holdin… (GETY) | 100 | 8.3 | -91.7% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 43.0 | -57.0% |
| The E.W. Scripps Co… (SSP) | 100 | 40.9 | -59.1% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GETY vs CSGP vs Z vs SSP vs TTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GETY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CSGP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.80
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -95.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- 77.5% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
Among these 5 stocks, Z doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SSP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (18.7x vs 21.2x)
- +95.8% vs TTD's -58.4%
TTD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 14.6% margin vs GETY's -21.0%
- 7.3% ROA vs GETY's -7.5%, ROIC 21.3% vs 4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs SSP's -14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.7x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.6% margin vs GETY's -21.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs GETY's 1.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +95.8% vs TTD's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs GETY's -7.5%, ROIC 21.3% vs 4.0% |
GETY vs CSGP vs Z vs SSP vs TTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GETY vs CSGP vs Z vs SSP vs TTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories
SSP leads 1 • GETY leads 0 • CSGP leads 0 • Z leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 3.5x GETY's $981M. TTD is the more profitable business, keeping 14.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GETY's -21.0%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $981M | $3.4B | $2.7B | $2.2B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $146M | $278M | $221M | $237M | $693M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$206M | $25M | $61M | -$101M | $433M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $241M | $433M | $7M | $837M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +77.4% | +73.3% | +33.7% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | -0.8% | +0.4% | +7.5% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | +0.7% | +2.3% | -4.7% | +14.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +7.1% | +16.1% | +0.3% | +28.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | +22.5% | +18.4% | -23.1% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +127.7% | +5.1% | -155.4% | -20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.8x trailing earnings, TTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GETY's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SSP's 285.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $346M | $14.8B | $10.6B | $552M | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $976M | $14.2B | $10.3B | $3.3B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.66x | 2107.23x | 482.65x | -2.50x | 25.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 592.50x | 25.84x | 19.71x | 18.72x | 21.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.67x | 83.74x | 39.58x | 285.46x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 4.57x | 4.09x | 0.26x | 3.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 1.77x | 2.27x | 0.33x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.31x | 361.59x | 44.97x | 84.68x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TTD delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GETY. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SSP's 2.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Z scores 7/9 vs SSP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.9% | +0.3% | +1.3% | -7.9% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +0.2% | +1.1% | -2.0% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | -0.9% | -0.5% | +3.1% | +21.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | -0.8% | -0.6% | +3.5% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 0.14x | 0.11x | 2.19x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $630M | -$589M | -$237M | $2.7B | -$222M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $1.7B | $773M | $28M | $658M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $720M | $1.1B | $536M | $2.7B | $436M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 1.58x | 5.22x | 0.55x | 1591.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — Z and SSP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSGP five years ago would be worth $4,112 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $829 for GETY. Over the past 12 months, SSP leads with a +95.8% total return vs TTD's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors Z at -3.3% vs GETY's -49.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.7% | -46.7% | -33.7% | +18.5% | -37.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.2% | -53.6% | -35.7% | +95.8% | -58.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | -52.9% | -9.5% | -40.9% | -63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.7% | -58.9% | -63.2% | -76.9% | -64.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.8% | +77.5% | +64.9% | -66.5% | +680.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.1% | -22.2% | -3.3% | -16.1% | -28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSGP and SSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GETY's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SSP currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 0.80x | 1.32x | 1.50x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.21 | $97.43 | $93.88 | $5.39 | $91.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $33.31 | $39.05 | $2.02 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.8% | +35.9% | +46.5% | +86.8% | +25.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.1 | 30.4 | 51.1 | 60.9 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 5.9M | 3.6M | 715K | 20.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GETY as "Hold", CSGP as "Buy", Z as "Hold", SSP as "Hold", TTD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 692.0% upside for GETY (target: $7) vs -16.7% for SSP (target: $4).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.57 | $61.91 | $80.00 | $3.90 | $37.12 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 25 | 46 | 8 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% | +6.3% | 0.0% | +12.3% |
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SSP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GETY vs CSGP vs Z vs SSP vs TTD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD?
On trailing P/E, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, The E. W. Scripps Company is actually cheaper at 18. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD?
Over the past 5 years, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) delivered a total return of -58. 9%, compared to -91. 7% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (GETY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus GETY's -91. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Getty Images Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning GETY is approximately 150% more volatile than CSGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 2% for The E. W. Scripps Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus -14. 3% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 9% year-over-year, compared to -624. 7% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTD leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD?
The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 3% net margin versus -21. 0% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The E.
W. Scripps Company (SSP) trades at 18. 7x forward P/E versus 592. 5x for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. — 573. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GETY: 692. 0% to $6. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GETY or CSGP or Z or SSP or TTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), +680. 4% 10Y return). Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (GETY) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTD: +680. 4%, GETY: -91. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GETY and CSGP and Z and SSP and TTD?
These companies operate in different sectors (GETY (Communication Services) and CSGP (Real Estate) and Z (Communication Services) and SSP (Communication Services) and TTD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GETY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; Z is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 7%
- Gross Margin > 44%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.