Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GIS vs HRL vs CPB vs CAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
GIS vs HRL vs CPB vs CAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $19.05B | $11.41B | $6.34B | $6.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.37B | $12.14B | $10.04B | $11.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.21B | $489M | $550M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 15.5% | 29.3% | 24.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.1% | 6.0% | 12.1% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 14.1x | 9.7x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $15.30B | $2.86B | $7.21B | $8.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $364M | $671M | $132M | $68M |
GIS vs HRL vs CPB vs CAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Mills, Inc. (GIS) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GIS vs HRL vs CPB vs CAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- -9.2% 10Y total return vs HRL's -23.9%
- 12.1% margin vs CAG's 0.1%
- 6.8% ROA vs CAG's 0.1%, ROIC 10.6% vs 6.0%
HRL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -24.7% vs CPB's -35.4%
CPB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8%
CAG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 93.0%, current ratio 0.71x
- PEG 1.21 vs GIS's 3.64
- Beta 0.06, yield 9.8%, current ratio 0.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 9.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs CAG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs HRL's 0.15 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HRL's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -24.7% vs CPB's -35.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs CAG's 0.1%, ROIC 10.6% vs 6.0% |
GIS vs HRL vs CPB vs CAG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GIS vs HRL vs CPB vs CAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
CAG leads 1 • HRL leads 1 • CPB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 1.8x CPB's $10.0B. GIS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAG's 0.1%. On growth, HRL holds the edge at +1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.4B | $12.1B | $10.0B | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.9B | $932M | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.2B | $489M | $550M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $578M | $919M | $634M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +15.5% | +29.3% | +24.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +6.0% | +12.1% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +4.0% | +5.5% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +4.8% | +9.2% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | +1.3% | -4.5% | -6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +6.5% | -17.2% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CAG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, CAG trades at a 75% valuation discount to HRL's 23.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAG offers better value at 0.85x vs GIS's 3.04x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.1B | $11.4B | $6.3B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34.0B | $13.6B | $13.4B | $15.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.71x | 23.84x | 10.57x | 5.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.43x | 14.13x | 9.74x | 8.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.04x | — | — | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.84x | 13.84x | 7.51x | 8.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 0.94x | 0.62x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.16x | 1.44x | 1.63x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.31x | 21.36x | 8.99x | 5.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GIS and HRL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GIS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $0 for CAG. HRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPB's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs HRL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.7% | +4.3% | +14.0% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +3.7% | +3.7% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +5.3% | +9.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.3% | +6.0% | +11.4% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.36x | 1.85x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14.9B | $2.2B | $7.1B | $8.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $364M | $671M | $132M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.3B | $2.9B | $7.2B | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.01x | 6.44x | 3.14x | 1.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GIS five years ago would be worth $7,472 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,565 for CAG. Over the past 12 months, HRL leads with a -24.7% total return vs CPB's -35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRL at -15.9% vs CPB's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.2% | -8.8% | -20.5% | -13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.9% | -24.7% | -35.4% | -31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.3% | -40.5% | -52.6% | -50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.3% | -44.3% | -41.9% | -44.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | -23.9% | -44.9% | -27.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | -15.9% | -22.0% | -21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GIS and HRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIS is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HRL's 0.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HRL currently trades 65.1% from its 52-week high vs CPB's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.04x | 0.15x | -0.02x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.35 | $31.86 | $36.16 | $23.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.58 | $20.32 | $19.76 | $13.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.5% | +65.1% | +58.8% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 39.5 | 46.7 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.7M | 4.2M | 9.1M | 14.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HRL and CAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GIS as "Hold", HRL as "Hold", CPB as "Hold", CAG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for HRL (target: $27) vs 21.6% for CPB (target: $26). For income investors, CAG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.75% vs HRL's 5.54%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.58 | $27.25 | $25.83 | $17.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 29 | 29 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +5.5% | +7.2% | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 34 | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.40 | $1.15 | $1.53 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.3% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.9% |
GIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CAG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
GIS vs HRL vs CPB vs CAG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger pick with 6.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Mills, Inc. (GIS) a "Hold" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG?
On trailing P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Hormel Foods Corporation at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Conagra Brands, Inc. wins at 1. 21x versus General Mills, Inc. 's 3. 64x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG?
Over the past 5 years, General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) delivered a total return of -25. 3%, compared to -44. 3% for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GIS returned -9. 2% versus CPB's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Hormel Foods Corporation's 0. 15β — meaning HRL is approximately -532% more volatile than GIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 185% for Campbell Soup Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is pulling ahead at 6.
4% versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -40. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG?
General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus 4. 0% for Hormel Foods Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GIS leads at 17. 0% versus 5. 9% for HRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GIS leads at 34. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 21x versus General Mills, Inc. 's 3. 64x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Hormel Foods Corporation — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRL: 31. 4% to $27. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the highest yield at 9. 8%, versus 5. 5% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL).
09Is GIS or HRL or CPB or CAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GIS: -9. 2%, HRL: -23. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GIS and HRL and CPB and CAG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.