Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GLBZ vs MNSB vs FUNC vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
GLBZ vs MNSB vs FUNC vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $14M | $176M | $248M | $253M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $136M | $112M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26K | $16M | $25M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | 54.4% | 68.8% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | 14.0% | 24.4% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.4x | 8.7x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $70M | $188M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $25M | $78M | $161M |
GLBZ vs MNSB vs FUNC vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLBZ vs MNSB vs FUNC vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLBZ is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.1% yield, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MNSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.66 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7%
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 241.1%
- PEG 0.77 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 10.4x)
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.70, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs GLBZ's +18.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% |
GLBZ vs MNSB vs FUNC vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GLBZ vs MNSB vs FUNC vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FXNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
GLBZ leads 1 • FUNC leads 1 • MNSB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB is the larger business by revenue, generating $136M annually — 8.5x GLBZ's $16M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLBZ's -0.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $136M | $112M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10,000 | $23M | $36M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26,000 | $16M | $25M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $13M | $16M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.4% | +54.4% | +68.8% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +14.0% | +24.4% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +11.5% | +18.4% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +7.8% | +18.2% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +120.9% | +20.2% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GLBZ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 15% valuation discount to FXNC's 14.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $176M | $248M | $253M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $221M | $357M | $134M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -125.61x | 13.36x | 12.12x | 14.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.45x | 8.68x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.08x | 9.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.58x | 11.52x | 6.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 1.30x | 2.22x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 0.82x | 1.39x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.57x | 12.18x | 12.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $0 for GLBZ. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLBZ's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs GLBZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | +7.3% | +12.5% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +5.0% | +5.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +0.9% | +8.5% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.32x | 1.05x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $45M | $109M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $25M | $78M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $70M | $188M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.06x | 0.31x | 1.01x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,088 for GLBZ. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +46.9% total return vs GLBZ's +18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs GLBZ's -12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +19.4% | +4.4% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | +26.4% | +27.8% | +46.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.7% | +21.5% | +218.6% | +110.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.1% | +20.6% | +134.5% | +68.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.9% | +126.9% | +289.2% | +241.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.3% | +6.7% | +47.1% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLBZ and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLBZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs GLBZ's 82.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.42x | 0.66x | 0.72x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.88 | $25.17 | $41.95 | $29.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $17.86 | $28.00 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +93.4% | +91.0% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 50.4 | 50.6 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 58K | 11K | 80K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLBZ and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNSB as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -24.9% upside for FXNC (target: $21) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, GLBZ offers the higher dividend yield at 6.15% vs FUNC's 2.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $25.00 | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | — | +2.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | — | $0.82 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
FXNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GLBZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GLBZ vs MNSB vs FUNC vs FXNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus First National Corporation at 14. 3x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to -49. 1% for Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus GLBZ's -20. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
42β versus First United Corporation's 0. 72β — meaning FUNC is approximately -271% more volatile than GLBZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 168% for Glen Burnie Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -107. 7% for Glen Burnie Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus -0. 7% for Glen Burnie Bancorp — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus -4. 0% for GLBZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for First National Corporation — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FXNC: -24. 9% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC?
In this comparison, GLBZ (6.
1% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLBZ or MNSB or FUNC or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
42), 6. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLBZ: -20. 9%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLBZ and MNSB and FUNC and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLBZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. GLBZ, FUNC, FXNC pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.