Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GLE vs NVDA vs AMD vs AIXI vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
GLE vs NVDA vs AMD vs AIXI vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $7M | $5.23T | $742.11B | $6M | $3.08T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $215.94B | $37.45B | $115M | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $649K | $120.07B | $4.99B | $-53M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 71.1% | 50.3% | 64.3% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 60.4% | 11.7% | -44.2% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 25.7x | 26.0x | 62.4x | — | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $11.41B | $4.47B | $46M | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $10.61B | $5.54B | $847K | $30.24B |
GLE vs NVDA vs AMD vs AIXI vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Engine Group… (GLE) | 100 | 10.0 | -90.0% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 277.4 | +177.4% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 11.1 | -88.9% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 96.5 | -3.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLE vs NVDA vs AMD vs AIXI vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, GLE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 243.2% 10Y total return vs AMD's 123.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs AMD's 12.08
AMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +347.6% vs AIXI's -83.7%
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.71 vs AMD's 2.52
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.85, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- Better valuation composite
- 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs GLE's 10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs AIXI's -45.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs AMD's 2.52 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +347.6% vs AIXI's -83.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 81.8% vs -34.4% |
GLE vs NVDA vs AMD vs AIXI vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLE vs NVDA vs AMD vs AIXI vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
MSFT leads 1 • GLE leads 0 • AMD leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 6917.5x GLE's $46M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $215.9B | $37.5B | $115M | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $133.2B | $6.6B | -$49M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $649,264 | $120.1B | $5.0B | -$53M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $96.7B | $8.6B | -$2M | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +71.1% | +50.3% | +64.3% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +60.4% | +11.7% | -44.2% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +55.6% | +13.3% | -45.9% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -39.0% | +44.8% | +22.9% | -2.0% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.2% | +73.2% | +37.8% | -64.9% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +97.8% | +90.9% | -29.9% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GLE and AIXI and MSFT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.7x trailing earnings, GLE trades at a 85% valuation discount to AMD's 171.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.46x vs AMD's 33.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $5.23T | $742.1B | $6M | $3.08T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $5.23T | $741.0B | $51M | $3.17T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.66x | 43.92x | 171.77x | -0.38x | 30.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.00x | 62.38x | — | 24.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.46x | 33.25x | — | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.90x | 39.27x | 110.64x | — | 19.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 24.22x | 21.42x | 0.09x | 10.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.57x | 33.43x | 11.82x | — | 9.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9999.00x | 54.10x | 110.19x | — | 43.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $1 for GLE. AMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSFT's 0.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs GLE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | +76.3% | +8.1% | — | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +58.1% | +6.5% | -65.3% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +37.4% | +81.8% | +4.7% | -34.4% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.2% | +97.2% | +5.7% | -3.4% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x | 0.07x | — | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $807M | -$1.1B | $45M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $10.6B | $5.5B | $846,593 | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $11.4B | $4.5B | $46M | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1334.18x | 545.03x | 33.19x | -14.13x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $150,908 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $117 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, AMD leads with a +347.6% total return vs AIXI's -83.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 94.7% vs AIXI's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | +14.0% | +103.7% | +41.9% | -12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.7% | +83.4% | +347.6% | -83.7% | -4.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +638.6% | +378.9% | -98.8% | +37.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +1409.1% | +499.0% | -98.8% | +73.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +24324.1% | +12371.0% | -98.8% | +776.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.1% | +94.7% | +68.6% | -77.2% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMD and AIXI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMD's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMD currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs GLE's 11.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.74x | 2.52x | 0.71x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.89 | $217.80 | $456.25 | $4.02 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $115.21 | $101.56 | $0.08 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.8% | +98.8% | +99.8% | +15.2% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.4 | 63.4 | 76.1 | 48.5 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 160.0M | 36.8M | 60.7M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.2% upside for MSFT (target: $557) vs -11.8% for AMD (target: $402). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $275.74 | $401.65 | — | $556.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 | 70 | — | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MSFT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
GLE vs NVDA vs AMD vs AIXI vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE). Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE) offers the better valuation at 25. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE) is the cheapest at 25.
7x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 171. 8x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1409%, compared to -98.
8% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +243. 2% versus AIXI's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning AMD is approximately 256% more volatile than AIXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 33% for Microsoft Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 10. 7% for Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -20. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -18. 3% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 62. 4x for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. — 37. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 34. 2% to $556. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. GLE, NVDA, AMD, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLE or NVDA or AMD or AIXI or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85), 0. 8% yield, +776. 0% 10Y return). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +776. 0%, AMD: +123. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLE and NVDA and AMD and AIXI and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while GLE, NVDA, AMD, AIXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.