REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GLPI vs MPW vs NNN vs O vs ADC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
GLPI vs MPW vs NNN vs O vs ADC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $13.57B | $3.37B | $8.47B | $57.62B | $9.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.56B | $972M | $936M | $5.92B | $750M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $892M | $-199M | $387M | $800M | $220M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 55.7% | 81.4% | 68.6% | 87.6% |
| Operating Margin | 82.0% | 38.1% | 63.3% | 29.3% | 48.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 49.4x | 21.7x | 37.1x | 38.9x |
| Total Debt | $7.79B | $128M | $4.82B | $32.85B | $3.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $224M | $541M | $5M | $435M | $16M |
GLPI vs MPW vs NNN vs O vs ADC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaming and Leisure … (GLPI) | 100 | 138.8 | +38.8% |
| Medical Properties … (MPW) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.4 | +15.4% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 121.6 | +21.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLPI vs MPW vs NNN vs O vs ADC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.19, yield 6.5%, current ratio 9.56x
- 57.3% margin vs MPW's -20.4%
- 6.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 6.9% ROA vs MPW's -1.3%
MPW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +18.6% vs ADC's +4.3%
NNN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.94 vs GLPI's 2.97
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 38.9x), PEG 1.94 vs 113.70
O is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 5.2%
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 81.9%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.09 vs MPW's 0.30
ADC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 135.6% 10Y total return vs GLPI's 122.5%
- 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs MPW's -2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs MPW's -2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 38.9x), PEG 1.94 vs 113.70 | |
| Quality / Margins | 57.3% margin vs MPW's -20.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs MPW's 0.30 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.6% vs ADC's +4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs MPW's -1.3% |
GLPI vs MPW vs NNN vs O vs ADC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GLPI vs MPW vs NNN vs O vs ADC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPW leads in 1 of 6 categories
GLPI leads 1 • ADC leads 1 • NNN leads 0 • O leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GLPI and ADC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 7.9x ADC's $750M. GLPI is the more profitable business, keeping 57.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPW's -20.4%. On growth, ADC holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $972M | $936M | $5.9B | $750M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $663M | $867M | $4.2B | $638M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $892M | -$199M | $387M | $800M | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $585M | $0 | $464M | $4.0B | $110M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +55.7% | +81.4% | +68.6% | +87.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +82.0% | +38.1% | +63.3% | +29.3% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +57.3% | -20.4% | +41.4% | +13.5% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +23.7% | +49.6% | +67.1% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.8% | +14.9% | +4.1% | +12.2% | +18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.3% | +123.2% | -2.0% | -103.6% | +19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MPW leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, GLPI trades at a 69% valuation discount to O's 52.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 1.93x vs ADC's 113.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.6B | $3.4B | $8.5B | $57.6B | $9.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.1B | $3.0B | $13.3B | $90.0B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.30x | -17.12x | 21.50x | 52.81x | 43.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.96x | 49.43x | 21.69x | 37.13x | 38.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.24x | — | 1.93x | 71.28x | 113.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.24x | 105.41x | 15.85x | 21.96x | 20.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.51x | 3.47x | 9.14x | 10.02x | 12.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 0.74x | 1.90x | 1.39x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.45x | 14.62x | 12.69x | 14.91x | 18.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLPI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLPI delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MPW. MPW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLPI's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLPI scores 5/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.9% | -4.3% | +8.8% | +2.0% | +3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | -1.3% | +4.1% | +1.1% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | — | +4.8% | +1.8% | +2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | — | +6.4% | +2.4% | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.03x | 1.09x | 0.82x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.6B | -$413M | $4.8B | $32.4B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $224M | $541M | $5M | $435M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.8B | $128M | $4.8B | $32.9B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.28x | — | 2.93x | — | 2.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLPI five years ago would be worth $13,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for MPW. Over the past 12 months, MPW leads with a +18.6% total return vs ADC's +4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADC at 8.0% vs MPW's -6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +13.0% | +15.6% | +9.7% | +7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.6% | +18.6% | +12.4% | +14.6% | +4.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.0% | -16.9% | +15.1% | +13.6% | +26.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.8% | -56.2% | +15.0% | +16.9% | +29.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.5% | -0.3% | +37.8% | +45.1% | +135.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | -6.0% | +4.8% | +4.3% | +8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and ADC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPW's 0.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs O's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.30x | 0.15x | 0.09x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.95 | $5.92 | $46.03 | $67.94 | $82.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.17 | $3.95 | $38.90 | $54.38 | $69.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +95.4% | +96.7% | +90.9% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 58.9 | 58.4 | 53.9 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.8M | 1.5M | 5.6M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLPI and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLPI as "Buy", MPW as "Hold", NNN as "Hold", O as "Hold", ADC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for ADC (target: $84) vs -11.5% for MPW (target: $5). For income investors, GLPI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.50% vs ADC's 4.01%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.17 | $5.00 | $46.06 | $65.25 | $83.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 28 | 29 | 34 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.5% | — | +5.3% | +5.2% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 9 | 14 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.11 | — | $2.36 | $3.23 | $3.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
MPW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GLPI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GLPI vs MPW vs NNN vs O vs ADC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW). Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC?
On trailing P/E, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(GLPI) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus Realty Income Corporation at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NNN REIT, Inc. wins at 1. 94x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC?
Over the past 5 years, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(GLPI) delivered a total return of +33. 8%, compared to -56. 2% for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADC returned +135. 6% versus MPW's -0. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Medical Properties Trust, Inc. 's 0. 30β — meaning MPW is approximately -318% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 156% for Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus -2. 4% for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medical Properties Trust, Inc. grew EPS 91. 8% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC?
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(GLPI) is the more profitable company, earning 51. 7% net margin versus -20. 4% for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 51. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLPI leads at 75. 3% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 94x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 49. 4x for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. — 34. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADC: 9. 4% to $83. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC?
In this comparison, GLPI (6.
5% yield), NNN (5. 3% yield), O (5. 2% yield), ADC (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. MPW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLPI or MPW or NNN or O or ADC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 4. 0% yield, +135. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +135. 6%, MPW: -0. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLPI and MPW and NNN and O and ADC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLPI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MPW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock. GLPI, NNN, O, ADC pay a dividend while MPW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.