Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GMGI vs DKNG vs GENI vs PENN vs RSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GMGI
Golden Matrix Group, Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$89M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.50B
5Y Perf.-32.7%
GENI
Genius Sports Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.-38.2%
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.-71.0%
RSI
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.98B
5Y Perf.+77.3%

GMGI vs DKNG vs GENI vs PENN vs RSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GMGI logoGMGI
DKNG logoDKNG
GENI logoGENI
PENN logoPENN
RSI logoRSI
IndustryElectronic Gaming & MultimediaGambling, Resorts & CasinosInternet Content & InformationGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$89M$12.50B$1.17B$2.24B$2.98B
Revenue (TTM)$190M$6.05B$669M$6.96B$1.24B
Net Income (TTM)$-90M$4M$-112M$-843M$37M
Gross Margin56.5%41.3%22.9%30.6%34.9%
Operating Margin-48.8%-0.2%-18.1%-7.9%9.3%
Forward P/E746.0x99.1x52.4x23.0x46.5x
Total Debt$23M$1.93B$30M$8.38B$18M
Cash & Equiv.$18M$1.60B$281M$687M$341M

GMGI vs DKNG vs GENI vs PENN vs RSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GMGI
DKNG
GENI
PENN
RSI
StockOct 20Mar 26Return
Golden Matrix Group… (GMGI)1000.9-99.1%
DraftKings Inc. (DKNG)10067.3-32.7%
Genius Sports Limit… (GENI)10061.8-38.2%
PENN Entertainment,… (PENN)10029.0-71.0%
Rush Street Interac… (RSI)100177.3+77.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GMGI vs DKNG vs GENI vs PENN vs RSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RSI leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Golden Matrix Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. GENI and PENN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GMGI
Golden Matrix Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

GMGI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.

  • 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
The Growth Play

DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
Best for: growth exposure
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
The Growth Leader

GENI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 31.0% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8%
Best for: growth
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
The Value Play

PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (23.0x vs 52.4x)
Best for: value
RSI
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
The Income Pick

RSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
  • 189.9% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.93x
  • Beta 1.07, current ratio 1.93x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGENI logoGENI31.0% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8%
ValuePENN logoPENNLower P/E (23.0x vs 52.4x)
Quality / MarginsRSI logoRSI3.0% margin vs GMGI's -47.1%
Stability / SafetyRSI logoRSIBeta 1.07 vs GMGI's 1.76, lower leverage
DividendsGMGI logoGMGI1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RSI logoRSI+138.2% vs GMGI's -97.2%
Efficiency (ROA)RSI logoRSI6.0% ROA vs GMGI's -55.1%

GMGI vs DKNG vs GENI vs PENN vs RSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GMGIGolden Matrix Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Segments
100.0%$183M
DKNGDraftKings Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service, Other
100.0%$423M
GENIGenius Sports Limited
FY 2025
Betting Technology Content And Services
70.4%$472M
Media Technology Content And Services
21.6%$144M
Sports Technology And Services
8.0%$53M
PENNPENN Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
76.9%$5.3B
Product and Service, Other
13.1%$912M
Food and Beverage
6.4%$446M
Occupancy
3.6%$253M
RSIRush Street Interactive, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Wagering
99.4%$1.1B
Social Gaming
0.4%$5M
Retail Sports Services
0.2%$2M

GMGI vs DKNG vs GENI vs PENN vs RSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRSILAGGINGPENN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 36.6x GMGI's $190M. RSI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GMGI's -47.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGMGI logoGMGIGolden Matrix Gro…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…RSI logoRSIRush Street Inter…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$190M$6.1B$669M$7.0B$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$82M$266M-$50M-$105M$156M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$90M$4M-$112M-$843M$37M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$612M$37M-$169M$147M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.5%+41.3%+22.9%+30.6%+34.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-48.8%-0.2%-18.1%-7.9%+9.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-47.1%+0.1%-16.7%-12.1%+3.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.5%+10.1%+5.5%-2.4%+11.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.3%+42.8%+37.0%+8.2%+41.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.3%+192.9%+33.8%+37.5%+60.0%
RSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GMGI and PENN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, GMGI's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.

MetricGMGI logoGMGIGolden Matrix Gro…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…RSI logoRSIRush Street Inter…
Market CapShares × price$89M$12.5B$1.2B$2.2B$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$98M$12.8B$924M$9.9B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-47.82x-3113.58x-10.83x-2.88x199.21x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.746.00x99.14x52.42x22.95x46.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.24x49.42x13.81x20.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.59x2.06x1.75x0.32x2.63x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.65x19.81x1.68x1.33x21.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF46.12x19.31x18.18x18.15x
Evenly matched — GMGI and PENN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

RSI delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-102 for GMGI. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGMGI logoGMGIGolden Matrix Gro…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…RSI logoRSIRush Street Inter…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-102.1%+0.5%-15.5%-34.7%+12.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-55.1%+0.1%-11.1%-5.7%+6.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-84.0%-0.9%-16.6%+1.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-92.2%-0.6%-15.3%+2.0%+26.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937355
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x3.06x0.04x4.58x0.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5M$330M-$250M$7.7B-$322M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$18M$1.6B$281M$687M$341M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$23M$1.9B$30M$8.4B$18M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.00x1.92x-136.57x-1.02x
RSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RSI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RSI five years ago would be worth $21,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for GMGI. Over the past 12 months, RSI leads with a +138.2% total return vs GMGI's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSI at 105.4% vs GMGI's -71.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGMGI logoGMGIGolden Matrix Gro…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…RSI logoRSIRush Street Inter…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-93.1%-29.3%-55.8%+12.9%+44.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.2%-27.3%-53.1%+6.7%+138.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%+4.3%+17.4%-35.3%+766.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-47.9%-74.6%-80.6%+113.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+157.3%-52.4%+11.9%+189.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-71.4%+1.4%+5.5%-13.5%+105.4%
RSI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GMGI's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSI currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs GMGI's 2.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGMGI logoGMGIGolden Matrix Gro…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…RSI logoRSIRush Street Inter…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.76x1.12x1.50x1.34x1.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$285.12$48.78$13.73$20.61$29.24
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.59$20.46$3.83$11.65$11.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.6%+51.7%+34.7%+81.4%+95.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10026.255.145.355.169.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded26K12.9M5.6M4.4M1.7M
RSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GENI and RSI each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GMGI as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", GENI as "Buy", PENN as "Buy", RSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $12) vs -75.9% for GMGI (target: $2). GMGI is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGMGI logoGMGIGolden Matrix Gro…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…RSI logoRSIRush Street Inter…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.80$36.88$12.10$19.88$30.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts148194713
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+6.6%0.0%+15.8%+0.3%
Evenly matched — GENI and RSI each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

RSI leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallRush Street Interactive, In… (RSI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GMGI vs DKNG vs GENI vs PENN vs RSI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) offers the better valuation at 199. 2x trailing P/E (46. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI?

On forward P/E, PENN Entertainment, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 23. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI?

Over the past 5 years, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.

(RSI) delivered a total return of +113. 9%, compared to -99. 6% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RSI returned +189. 9% versus GMGI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rush Street Interactive, Inc.

(RSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Golden Matrix Group, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GMGI is approximately 64% more volatile than RSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.

0% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to -48. 7% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GMGI leads at 71. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI?

Rush Street Interactive, Inc.

(RSI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -50. 3% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSI leads at 7. 7% versus -52. 6% for GMGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GMGI leads at 56. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, PENN Entertainment, Inc.

(PENN) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 746. 0x for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. — 723. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $12. 10.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI?

In this comparison, GMGI (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. DKNG, GENI, PENN, RSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GMGI or DKNG or GENI or PENN or RSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.

(RSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +189. 9% 10Y return). Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSI: +189. 9%, GENI: -52. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GMGI and DKNG and GENI and PENN and RSI?

These companies operate in different sectors (GMGI (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and RSI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GMGI is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock. GMGI pays a dividend while DKNG, GENI, PENN, RSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GMGI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DKNG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GENI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PENN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GMGI and DKNG and GENI and PENN and RSI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GMGI: 17.3% · DKNG: 42.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.