Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GPJA vs AEP vs SO vs EXC vs DUK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
GPJA vs AEP vs SO vs EXC vs DUK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $246M | $70.82B | $103.49B | $44.93B | $96.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.56B | $22.16B | $30.17B | $24.79B | $33.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.63B | $3.65B | $4.36B | $2.78B | $5.14B |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | 40.4% | 43.1% | 24.1% | 58.4% |
| Operating Margin | 50.2% | 23.5% | 24.1% | 21.0% | 27.0% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 20.5x | 20.1x | 15.4x | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $19.88B | $50.24B | $65.82B | $50.55B | $90.87B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $268M | $1.64B | $1.15B | $245M |
GPJA vs AEP vs SO vs EXC vs DUK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia Power Compa… (GPJA) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
| American Electric P… (AEP) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 160.9 | +60.9% |
| Exelon Corporation (EXC) | 100 | 160.7 | +60.7% |
| Duke Energy Corpora… (DUK) | 100 | 145.0 | +45.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPJA vs AEP vs SO vs EXC vs DUK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GPJA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 77.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 0.72x
- PEG 0.00 vs SO's 3.43
AEP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 145.9% 10Y total return vs SO's 136.5%
- +28.2% vs EXC's +1.0%
SO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
EXC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DUK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 18.5x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.9% margin vs EXC's 11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (83.9% vs 175.5%) | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AEP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.2% vs EXC's +1.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs EXC's 2.4%, ROIC 12.7% vs 5.1% |
GPJA vs AEP vs SO vs EXC vs DUK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GPJA vs AEP vs SO vs EXC vs DUK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GPJA leads in 3 of 6 categories
AEP leads 1 • SO leads 0 • EXC leads 0 • DUK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPJA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUK is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 2.0x GPJA's $16.6B. GPJA is the more profitable business, keeping 27.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXC's 11.2%. On growth, GPJA holds the edge at +125.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $22.2B | $30.2B | $24.8B | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.1B | $8.8B | $13.3B | $8.9B | $15.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.6B | $3.7B | $4.4B | $2.8B | $5.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.8B | $840M | -$3.8B | -$2.2B | $6.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.7% | +40.4% | +43.1% | +24.1% | +58.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.2% | +23.5% | +24.1% | +21.0% | +27.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +16.5% | +14.5% | +11.2% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +3.8% | -12.7% | -8.7% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +125.3% | +6.8% | +8.0% | +7.9% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.1% | +6.7% | -0.8% | 0.0% | +11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GPJA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, GPJA trades at a 100% valuation discount to SO's 23.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GPJA offers better value at 0.00x vs SO's 4.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $246M | $70.8B | $103.5B | $44.9B | $96.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.0B | $120.8B | $167.7B | $94.3B | $187.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.06x | 19.54x | 23.42x | 16.03x | 19.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.51x | 20.06x | 15.39x | 18.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 2.29x | 4.00x | 2.51x | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.69x | 13.75x | 12.61x | 10.74x | 12.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 3.25x | 3.50x | 1.85x | 3.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.10x | 2.62x | 1.54x | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.63x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPJA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPJA delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for DUK. GPJA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXC's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GPJA scores 7/9 vs DUK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +11.5% | +11.3% | +9.8% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.5% | +3.2% | +2.8% | +2.4% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +5.1% | +5.3% | +5.1% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +5.5% | +5.4% | +5.0% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 1.56x | 1.69x | 1.76x | 1.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19.8B | $50.0B | $64.2B | $49.4B | $90.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $268M | $1.6B | $1.2B | $245M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.9B | $50.2B | $65.8B | $50.6B | $90.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.61x | 2.51x | 2.42x | 2.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEP five years ago would be worth $16,838 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,842 for GPJA. Over the past 12 months, AEP leads with a +28.2% total return vs EXC's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEP at 15.5% vs GPJA's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | +14.0% | +6.1% | +0.9% | +6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.2% | +28.2% | +4.9% | +1.0% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | +54.0% | +34.7% | +13.5% | +38.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.4% | +68.4% | +59.6% | +60.8% | +39.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.3% | +145.9% | +136.5% | +123.0% | +103.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +15.5% | +10.4% | +4.3% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AEP and DUK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DUK is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPJA's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEP currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs EXC's 86.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | -0.01x | -0.16x | -0.16x | -0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.00 | $139.44 | $100.84 | $50.65 | $134.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.34 | $97.46 | $83.09 | $41.71 | $111.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.8% | +93.3% | +91.0% | +86.7% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 44.7 | 39.8 | 30.7 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 2.9M | 4.4M | 8.2M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GPJA and AEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AEP as "Buy", SO as "Hold", EXC as "Hold", DUK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for EXC (target: $49) vs 5.4% for AEP (target: $137). For income investors, GPJA offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs SO's 2.96%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.25 | $99.62 | $49.18 | $136.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 | 33 | 35 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +3.0% | +3.0% | +3.6% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $268.06 | $3.86 | $2.72 | $1.60 | $4.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GPJA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AEP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GPJA vs AEP vs SO vs EXC vs DUK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) is the stronger pick with 12.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK?
On trailing P/E, Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) is the cheapest at 0.
1x versus The Southern Company at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Exelon Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Duke Energy Corporation wins at 0. 62x versus The Southern Company's 3. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK?
Over the past 5 years, American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) delivered a total return of +68. 4%, compared to +8. 4% for Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEP returned +145. 9% versus GPJA's +26. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77's 0. 80β — meaning GPJA is approximately -431% more volatile than DUK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 176% for Exelon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) is pulling ahead at 12.
0% versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 grew EPS 77. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXC leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK?
Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) is the more profitable company, earning 38.
8% net margin versus 11. 4% for Exelon Corporation — meaning it keeps 38. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPJA leads at 62. 4% versus 21. 2% for EXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPJA leads at 54. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus The Southern Company's 3. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Exelon Corporation (EXC) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for American Electric Power Company, Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXC: 12. 0% to $49. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 3. 0% for The Southern Company (SO).
09Is GPJA or AEP or SO or EXC or DUK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 3. 4% yield, +103. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DUK: +103. 3%, GPJA: +26. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GPJA and AEP and SO and EXC and DUK?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GPJA is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DUK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.