Consumer Electronics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GPRO vs VUZI vs IMMR vs META vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Consumer Electronics
GPRO vs VUZI vs IMMR vs META vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Consumer Electronics | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $213M | $232M | $211M | $1.56T | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $652M | $5M | $1.47B | $214.96B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-93M | $-32.28B | $66M | $70.59B | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 33.6% | -0.0% | 27.8% | 81.9% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | -12.8% | -5.2% | 9.1% | 41.2% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 27.8x | — | 15.5x | 20.4x | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $83M | $1.00B | $322M | $83.90B | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $21.15B | $78M | $35.87B | $35.93B |
GPRO vs VUZI vs IMMR vs META vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 114.9 | +14.9% |
| Immersion Corporati… (IMMR) | 100 | 96.0 | -4.0% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPRO vs VUZI vs IMMR vs META vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GPRO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +134.6% vs IMMR's -6.1%
VUZI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs GPRO's -18.7%
- 10.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
IMMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 56.9%, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 1.52, yield 6.0%, current ratio 1.72x
META is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.11 vs AAPL's 1.89
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 33.8x), PEG 1.11 vs 1.89
- 32.8% margin vs VUZI's -5.1%
AAPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.4%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs META's 421.2%
- Beta 0.99 vs VUZI's 3.40
- 34.0% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 67.4% vs -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs GPRO's -18.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 33.8x), PEG 1.11 vs 1.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.8% margin vs VUZI's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs VUZI's 3.40 | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.6% vs IMMR's -6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 67.4% vs -10.7% |
GPRO vs VUZI vs IMMR vs META vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GPRO vs VUZI vs IMMR vs META vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories
META leads 1 • VUZI leads 1 • GPRO leads 0 • IMMR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 83857.2x VUZI's $5M. META is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VUZI's -5.1%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $652M | $5M | $1.5B | $215.0B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$78M | -$30.9B | $166M | $109.3B | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$93M | -$32.3B | $66M | $70.6B | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$20.8B | -$69M | $48.3B | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | -0.0% | +27.8% | +81.9% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.8% | -5.2% | +9.1% | +41.2% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.3% | -5.1% | +4.5% | +32.8% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | -3.3% | -4.7% | +22.4% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | +4933.1% | +5.4% | +33.1% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | +25.0% | -137.3% | +62.4% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
VUZI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, IMMR trades at a 96% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), META offers better value at 1.43x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $213M | $232M | $211M | $1.56T | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $246M | -$19.9B | $455M | $1.61T | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.36x | -6.81x | 1.58x | 26.26x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.80x | — | 15.49x | 20.36x | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.43x | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.95x | 15.81x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.04x | 0.17x | 7.78x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.88x | 0.01x | 0.38x | 7.31x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 33.90x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. VUZI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs IMMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -102.5% | -5.2% | +13.0% | +33.2% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.0% | -3.2% | +5.3% | +20.8% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.4% | -10.7% | +21.2% | +27.6% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.3% | -184.6% | +25.8% | +29.4% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 0.04x | 0.57x | 0.39x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34M | -$20.1B | $244M | $48.0B | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $21.2B | $78M | $35.9B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83M | $1.0B | $322M | $83.9B | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.43x | — | 12.24x | 78.84x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,287 for GPRO. Over the past 12 months, GPRO leads with a +134.6% total return vs IMMR's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors META at 38.6% vs GPRO's -31.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.8% | -25.7% | +3.6% | -5.1% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +134.6% | +63.4% | -6.1% | +3.7% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.6% | -29.6% | +3.4% | +166.4% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | -84.8% | -6.1% | +94.8% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.8% | -35.7% | +13.3% | +421.2% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.3% | -11.0% | +1.1% | +38.6% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VUZI's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs GPRO's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.08x | 3.40x | 1.52x | 1.59x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.05 | $4.29 | $8.15 | $796.25 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $1.71 | $5.25 | $520.26 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.6% | +66.7% | +79.6% | +77.5% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 61.1 | 61.0 | 42.8 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.3M | 924K | 518K | 15.6M | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VUZI and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GPRO as "Hold", VUZI as "Buy", IMMR as "Buy", META as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 259.7% upside for GPRO (target: $5) vs 10.3% for AAPL (target: $317). For income investors, VUZI offers the higher dividend yield at 10.10% vs META's 0.34%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $6.00 | $10.00 | $821.80 | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 5 | 15 | 60 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.1% | +6.0% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 | $0.39 | $2.07 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.7% | +2.1% |
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). META leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
GPRO vs VUZI vs IMMR vs META vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18.
7% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the cheapest at 1.
6x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Immersion Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Meta Platforms, Inc. wins at 1. 11x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -87. 1% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus GPRO's -85. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Vuzix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning VUZI is approximately 245% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -18.
7% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immersion Corporation grew EPS 295. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL?
Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus -513. 9% for Vuzix Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -517. 6% for VUZI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 18. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPRO: 259. 7% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL?
In this comparison, VUZI (10.
1% yield), IMMR (6. 0% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), META (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. GPRO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GPRO or VUZI or IMMR or META or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1174% 10Y return). GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1174%, GPRO: -85. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GPRO and VUZI and IMMR and META and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (GPRO (Technology) and VUZI (Technology) and IMMR (Technology) and META (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GPRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. VUZI, IMMR pay a dividend while GPRO, META, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.