GRAN vs RMR vs CBRE vs NMRK vs JLL

For growth investors, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (GRAN) offers the better valuation at 6. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (GRAN) is the cheapest at 6.

4x versus CBRE Group, Inc. at 37. 4x. On forward P/E, Newmark Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Newmark Group, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 61x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) delivered a total return of +70. 7%, compared to -77. 6% for Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (GRAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +400. 0% versus GRAN's -77. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Newmark Group, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning NMRK is approximately 126% more volatile than RMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (GRAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 114% for Newmark Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmark Group, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for The RMR Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBRE leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (GRAN) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

3% net margin versus 2. 5% for The RMR Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRAN leads at 43. 8% versus 3. 2% for CBRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JLL leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 61x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for The RMR Group Inc. — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMR: 66. 2% to $32. 00.

In this comparison, RMR (9.

5% yield), GRAN (7. 5% yield), NMRK (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CBRE, JLL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 9. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMR: +40. 3%, JLL: +192. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (GRAN (Financial Services) and RMR (Real Estate) and CBRE (Real Estate) and NMRK (Real Estate) and JLL (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GRAN is a small-cap deep-value stock; RMR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NMRK is a small-cap high-growth stock; JLL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GRAN, RMR, NMRK pay a dividend while CBRE, JLL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.