Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GRNQ vs TASK vs EXLS vs HCKT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GRNQ
Greenpro Capital Corp.

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • MY
Market Cap$19M
5Y Perf.-83.0%
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$573M
5Y Perf.-81.4%
EXLS
ExlService Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.90B
5Y Perf.+47.5%
HCKT
The Hackett Group, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$288M
5Y Perf.-36.7%

GRNQ vs TASK vs EXLS vs HCKT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GRNQ logoGRNQ
TASK logoTASK
EXLS logoEXLS
HCKT logoHCKT
IndustryConsulting ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$19M$573M$4.90B$288M
Revenue (TTM)$3M$1.21B$2.16B$297M
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$105M$252M$14M
Gross Margin85.1%35.5%38.5%30.1%
Operating Margin-39.6%11.6%15.2%10.5%
Forward P/E4.6x14.1x6.9x
Total Debt$34K$298M$404M$80M
Cash & Equiv.$1M$212M$146M$18M

GRNQ vs TASK vs EXLS vs HCKTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GRNQ
TASK
EXLS
HCKT
StockJun 21May 26Return
Greenpro Capital Co… (GRNQ)10017.0-83.0%
TaskUs, Inc. (TASK)10018.6-81.4%
ExlService Holdings… (EXLS)100147.5+47.5%
The Hackett Group, … (HCKT)10063.3-36.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GRNQ vs TASK vs EXLS vs HCKT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GRNQ and TASK are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. TaskUs, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. EXLS and HCKT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GRNQ
Greenpro Capital Corp.
The Defensive Pick

GRNQ has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 2.25x
  • Beta 0.28, current ratio 2.25x
  • Beta 0.28 vs TASK's 1.12, lower leverage
  • +152.8% vs HCKT's -50.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.
The Growth Play

TASK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
  • PEG 0.18 vs EXLS's 0.58
  • 19.0% revenue growth vs HCKT's -2.6%
  • Lower P/E (4.6x vs 6.9x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.31
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
EXLS
ExlService Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

EXLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.67
  • 221.4% 10Y total return vs HCKT's 0.9%
  • 11.7% margin vs GRNQ's -41.1%
  • 14.8% ROA vs GRNQ's -20.9%, ROIC 20.4% vs -17.4%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
HCKT
The Hackett Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

HCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 4.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTASK logoTASK19.0% revenue growth vs HCKT's -2.6%
ValueTASK logoTASKLower P/E (4.6x vs 6.9x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.31
Quality / MarginsEXLS logoEXLS11.7% margin vs GRNQ's -41.1%
Stability / SafetyGRNQ logoGRNQBeta 0.28 vs TASK's 1.12, lower leverage
DividendsHCKT logoHCKT4.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GRNQ logoGRNQ+152.8% vs HCKT's -50.3%
Efficiency (ROA)EXLS logoEXLS14.8% ROA vs GRNQ's -20.9%, ROIC 20.4% vs -17.4%

GRNQ vs TASK vs EXLS vs HCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GRNQGreenpro Capital Corp.
FY 2024
Digital Revenue
81.0%$327,802
Rental Revenue
19.0%$76,700
TASKTaskUs, Inc.
FY 2025
Digital Customer Experience
75.5%$662M
AI Services
24.5%$214M
EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Digital Operations And Solutions Services
56.7%$1.0B
Analytics Services
43.3%$796M
HCKTThe Hackett Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Revenue Before Reimbursements
98.4%$301M
Reimbursements
1.6%$5M

GRNQ vs TASK vs EXLS vs HCKT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGRNQLAGGINGHCKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

EXLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 693.5x GRNQ's $3M. EXLS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRNQ's -41.1%. On growth, EXLS holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGRNQ logoGRNQGreenpro Capital …TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…HCKT logoHCKTThe Hackett Group…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$1.2B$2.2B$297M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$204M$410M$35M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M$105M$252M$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M$88M$297M$25M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+85.1%+35.5%+38.5%+30.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-39.6%+11.6%+15.2%+10.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-41.1%+8.7%+11.7%+4.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-43.4%+7.3%+13.8%+8.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.1%+10.3%+13.8%-11.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.6%+13.0%+7.5%+54.5%
EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TASK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 76% valuation discount to HCKT's 24.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs HCKT's 1.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGRNQ logoGRNQGreenpro Capital …TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…HCKT logoHCKTThe Hackett Group…
Market CapShares × price$19M$573M$4.9B$288M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18M$660M$5.2B$349M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-23.83x5.79x20.35x24.28x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.58x14.09x6.90x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.23x0.84x1.08x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.26x13.84x10.97x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.33x0.48x2.35x0.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.28x0.99x5.58x4.57x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.78x16.44x8.87x
TASK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EXLS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

EXLS delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-30 for GRNQ. GRNQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCKT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TASK scores 7/9 vs HCKT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGRNQ logoGRNQGreenpro Capital …TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…HCKT logoHCKTThe Hackett Group…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-29.6%+21.2%+27.2%+15.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-20.9%+10.3%+14.8%+7.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-17.4%+16.3%+20.4%+16.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.7%+16.7%+23.2%+18.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95775
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.50x0.44x1.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M$86M$257M$61M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$212M$146M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$33,930$298M$404M$80M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.99x7.12x11.80x37.81x
EXLS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GRNQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EXLS five years ago would be worth $15,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,654 for GRNQ. Over the past 12 months, GRNQ leads with a +152.8% total return vs HCKT's -50.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRNQ at 4.0% vs HCKT's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGRNQ logoGRNQGreenpro Capital …TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…HCKT logoHCKTThe Hackett Group…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.4%-12.3%-24.0%-41.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+152.8%-28.3%-31.9%-50.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.5%-18.1%+4.3%-31.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.5%-67.8%+60.0%-18.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%-67.8%+221.4%+0.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.0%-6.4%+1.4%-11.6%
GRNQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GRNQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GRNQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TASK's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRNQ currently trades 70.8% from its 52-week high vs TASK's 34.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGRNQ logoGRNQGreenpro Capital …TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…HCKT logoHCKTThe Hackett Group…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.28x1.12x0.67x1.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.18$18.39$48.54$26.29
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.85$5.89$26.94$9.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.8%+34.6%+64.6%+43.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.942.048.528.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K736K2.2M299K
GRNQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — EXLS and HCKT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TASK as "Buy", EXLS as "Buy", HCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.9% upside for TASK (target: $14) vs 28.4% for EXLS (target: $40). HCKT is the only dividend payer here at 4.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGRNQ logoGRNQGreenpro Capital …TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.EXLS logoEXLSExlService Holdin…HCKT logoHCKTThe Hackett Group…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$40.25$20.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts11195
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.47
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.8%+6.7%+24.0%
Evenly matched — EXLS and HCKT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

EXLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GRNQ leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallGreenpro Capital Corp. (GRNQ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GRNQ vs TASK vs EXLS vs HCKT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT?

On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus The Hackett Group, Inc. at 24. 3x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT?

Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) delivered a total return of +60. 0%, compared to -83. 5% for Greenpro Capital Corp. (GRNQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +221. 4% versus GRNQ's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Greenpro Capital Corp.

(GRNQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus TaskUs, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning TASK is approximately 295% more volatile than GRNQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Greenpro Capital Corp. (GRNQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 117% for The Hackett Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -2. 6% for The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -167. 4% for Greenpro Capital Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXLS leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT?

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus -20. 5% for Greenpro Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXLS leads at 15. 0% versus -27. 7% for GRNQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRNQ leads at 87. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TASK: 111. 9% to $13. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT?

In this comparison, HCKT (4.

1% yield) pays a dividend. GRNQ, TASK, EXLS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GRNQ or TASK or EXLS or HCKT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Greenpro Capital Corp.

(GRNQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRNQ: -99. 0%, TASK: -67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GRNQ and TASK and EXLS and HCKT?

These companies operate in different sectors (GRNQ (Industrials) and TASK (Technology) and EXLS (Technology) and HCKT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GRNQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HCKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HCKT pays a dividend while GRNQ, TASK, EXLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GRNQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 51%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TASK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXLS

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HCKT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GRNQ and TASK and EXLS and HCKT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GRNQ: -27.1% · TASK: 10.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.