Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GROV vs BYFC vs WDFC vs CARV vs MGYR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Chemicals - Specialty
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
GROV vs BYFC vs WDFC vs CARV vs MGYR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Banks - Regional | Chemicals - Specialty | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $54M | $91M | $4.15B | $9M | $114M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $166M | $63M | $621M | $37M | $58M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-25M | $90M | $-13M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | 51.9% | 55.4% | 56.3% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | -38.8% | 16.4% | -36.8% | 23.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 34.7x | — | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $153M | $98M | $29M | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $11M | $58M | $50M | $7M |
GROV vs BYFC vs WDFC vs CARV vs MGYR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grove Collaborative… (GROV) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Broadway Financial … (BYFC) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| WD-40 Company (WDFC) | 100 | 85.0 | -15.0% |
| Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 155.4 | +55.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GROV vs BYFC vs WDFC vs CARV vs MGYR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GROV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BYFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.01, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.03x
- Beta 0.01 vs GROV's 1.18, lower leverage
- 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WDFC's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
WDFC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 2.79x
- 19.5% ROA vs GROV's -16.9%, ROIC 26.2% vs -31.7%
Among these 5 stocks, CARV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MGYR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 125.7% 10Y total return vs WDFC's 120.8%
- PEG 0.35 vs WDFC's 3.97
- NIM 3.2% vs BYFC's 2.5%
- 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs GROV's -14.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs GROV's -14.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 34.7x), PEG 0.35 vs 3.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs BYFC's -39.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs GROV's 1.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WDFC's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.9% vs WDFC's -9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs GROV's -16.9%, ROIC 26.2% vs -31.7% |
GROV vs BYFC vs WDFC vs CARV vs MGYR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GROV vs BYFC vs WDFC vs CARV vs MGYR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGYR leads in 3 of 6 categories
WDFC leads 1 • BYFC leads 1 • GROV leads 0 • CARV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGYR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $621M annually — 16.6x CARV's $37M. MGYR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYFC's -39.3%. On growth, WDFC holds the edge at +0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $166M | $63M | $621M | $37M | $58M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$24M | $111M | -$10M | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$25M | $90M | -$13M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$13,000 | $78M | -$9M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.1% | +51.9% | +55.4% | +56.3% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | -38.8% | +16.4% | -36.8% | +23.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | -39.3% | +14.4% | -36.8% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | -0.0% | +12.6% | -34.6% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.8% | — | +0.6% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.0% | -46.8% | -7.9% | -12.2% | +51.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MGYR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, MGYR trades at a 64% valuation discount to WDFC's 31.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs WDFC's 3.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $91M | $4.2B | $9M | $114M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $233M | $4.2B | -$12M | $156M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.79x | -3.03x | 31.10x | -0.62x | 11.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 34.73x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.56x | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 37.45x | — | 10.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 1.45x | 6.70x | 0.23x | 1.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.48x | 0.32x | 10.53x | 0.29x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 49.82x | — | 11.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDFC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WDFC delivers a 33.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-106 for GROV. WDFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GROV's 2.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WDFC scores 7/9 vs CARV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -106.3% | -9.1% | +33.9% | -48.4% | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.9% | -1.9% | +19.5% | -1.9% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.7% | -3.7% | +26.2% | -13.0% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.6% | -5.6% | +28.9% | -15.4% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.63x | 0.58x | 0.36x | 0.98x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $142M | $40M | -$21M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $11M | $58M | $50M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $153M | $98M | $29M | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.02x | -0.87x | 32.08x | -0.71x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGYR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGYR five years ago would be worth $17,493 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $262 for GROV. Over the past 12 months, BYFC leads with a +52.9% total return vs WDFC's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGYR at 22.9% vs CARV's -27.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | +28.8% | +6.8% | +17.9% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.3% | +52.9% | -9.7% | +21.3% | +22.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | +30.3% | +18.7% | -61.8% | +85.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -31.9% | -6.4% | -79.2% | +74.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -37.8% | +120.8% | -54.2% | +125.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.8% | +9.2% | +5.9% | -27.4% | +22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BYFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GROV's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYFC currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs CARV's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.01x | 0.19x | 0.16x | 0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.84 | $9.86 | $253.24 | $3.85 | $20.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.03 | $5.60 | $175.38 | $1.07 | $14.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.1% | +99.4% | +82.2% | +42.9% | +88.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 80.3 | 45.2 | 51.2 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 78K | 3K | 175K | 4K | 6K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BYFC and WDFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BYFC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.55% vs MGYR's 1.66%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $300.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 7 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.6% | +1.8% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 22 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.35 | $3.70 | — | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
MGYR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WDFC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GROV vs BYFC vs WDFC vs CARV vs MGYR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GROV or BYFC or WDFC or CARV or MGYR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 6% for Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. (GROV). Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WD-40 Company (WDFC) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GROV or BYFC or WDFC or CARV or MGYR?
On trailing P/E, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus WD-40 Company at 31. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GROV or BYFC or WDFC or CARV or MGYR?
Over the past 5 years, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) delivered a total return of +74. 9%, compared to -97. 4% for Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. (GROV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGYR returned +125. 7% versus GROV's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GROV or BYFC or WDFC or CARV or MGYR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
01β versus Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning GROV is approximately 14086% more volatile than BYFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WD-40 Company (WDFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 3% for Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GROV or BYFC or WDFC or CARV or MGYR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -14. 6% for Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. (GROV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 55. 3% year-over-year, compared to -81. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WDFC leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GROV or BYFC or WDFC or CARV or MGYR?
Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus -39. 3% for Broadway Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGYR leads at 23. 6% versus -38. 8% for BYFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGYR leads at 60. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GROV or BYFC or WDFC or CARV or MGYR?
In this comparison, BYFC (3.
6% yield), WDFC (1. 8% yield), MGYR (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. GROV, CARV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GROV or BYFC or WDFC or CARV or MGYR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYFC: -37. 8%, GROV: -97. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GROV and BYFC and WDFC and CARV and MGYR?
These companies operate in different sectors (GROV (Consumer Defensive) and BYFC (Financial Services) and WDFC (Basic Materials) and CARV (Financial Services) and MGYR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GROV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYFC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WDFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock. BYFC, WDFC, MGYR pay a dividend while GROV, CARV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.