Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GSIW
Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$457M
5Y Perf.-98.1%
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$590M
5Y Perf.+21.1%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.59B
5Y Perf.+53.1%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$88.45B
5Y Perf.+21.6%
MKTX
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.43B
5Y Perf.-47.9%

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GSIW logoGSIW
PFIS logoPFIS
NDAQ logoNDAQ
ICE logoICE
MKTX logoMKTX
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$457M$590M$50.59B$88.45B$5.43B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$281M$8.22B$12.64B$849M
Net Income (TTM)$13M$59M$1.91B$3.30B$310M
Gross Margin4.7%66.6%47.9%61.9%69.9%
Operating Margin-80.0%25.7%28.4%38.7%41.2%
Forward P/E9.0x22.6x19.5x18.6x
Total Debt$199K$258M$9.93B$20.28B$285M
Cash & Equiv.$625K$58M$814M$837M$520M

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GSIW
PFIS
NDAQ
ICE
MKTX
StockDec 23May 26Return
Garden Stage Limite… (GSIW)1001.9-98.1%
Peoples Financial S… (PFIS)100121.1+21.1%
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)100153.1+53.1%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100121.6+21.6%
MarketAxess Holding… (MKTX)10052.1-47.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFIS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Nasdaq, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GSIW and ICE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GSIW
Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares
The Banking Pick

GSIW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 3.8%
Best for: growth
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
The Banking Pick

PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
  • PEG 1.13 vs MKTX's 3.03
  • Beta 0.82, yield 4.1%, current ratio 8.76x
  • NIM 3.1% vs GSIW's 0.4%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NDAQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 347.6% 10Y total return vs ICE's 225.3%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
  • Beta 0.33 vs GSIW's 2.04
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MKTX
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, MKTX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGSIW logoGSIW296.0% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 3.8%
ValuePFIS logoPFISLower P/E (9.0x vs 18.6x), PEG 1.13 vs 3.03
Quality / MarginsNDAQ logoNDAQEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.33 vs GSIW's 2.04
DividendsPFIS logoPFIS4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PFIS logoPFIS+34.0% vs GSIW's -64.8%
Efficiency (ROA)NDAQ logoNDAQEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8%

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GSIWGarden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

PFISPeoples Financial Services Corp.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing
67.6%$14M
Asset Management
14.7%$3M
Commission And Fees On Fiduciary Activities
11.3%$2M
Credit Card
6.4%$1M
NDAQNasdaq, Inc.
FY 2025
Market Services
51.4%$4.2B
Capital Access Platforms
26.1%$2.1B
Market Technology
22.6%$1.9B
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
MKTXMarketAxess Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Commission Revenue
86.8%$735M
Information Services
6.3%$53M
Post Trade Services
5.3%$44M
Technology Services
1.6%$14M

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPFISLAGGINGICE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MKTX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 2339.1x GSIW's $5M. MKTX is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIW's -79.9%.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …MKTX logoMKTXMarketAxess Holdi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$281M$8.2B$12.6B$849M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$80M$3.1B$6.5B$443M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$13M$59M$1.9B$3.3B$310M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M$43M$2.0B$4.3B$236M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+4.7%+66.6%+47.9%+61.9%+69.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-80.0%+25.7%+28.4%+38.7%+41.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-79.9%+21.1%+21.8%+26.1%+29.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-25.3%+15.4%+24.2%+33.9%+44.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.7%+95.1%+33.8%+23.1%+4.5%
MKTX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFIS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.0x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 65% valuation discount to NDAQ's 28.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFIS offers better value at 1.25x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …MKTX logoMKTXMarketAxess Holdi…
Market CapShares × price$457M$590M$50.6B$88.4B$5.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$456M$790M$59.7B$107.9B$5.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-104.39x10.03x28.80x27.06x22.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.02x22.65x19.48x18.63x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.25x2.70x3.05x3.03x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.94x20.14x16.71x11.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue84.53x2.10x6.16x7.00x6.39x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share68.14x1.14x4.19x3.08x4.85x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.61x25.44x20.62x14.51x
PFIS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — GSIW and MKTX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

GSIW delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for ICE. GSIW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NDAQ's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDAQ scores 9/9 vs MKTX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …MKTX logoMKTXMarketAxess Holdi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.9%+11.8%+15.9%+11.6%+24.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.6%+1.2%+6.4%+2.3%+15.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.3%+7.7%+8.1%+7.5%+18.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-53.1%+2.4%+10.2%+9.5%+25.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956995
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.50x0.81x0.70x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$425,481$200M$9.1B$19.4B-$235M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$624,583$58M$814M$837M$520M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$199,102$258M$9.9B$20.3B$285M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.77x14.11x6.53x168.60x
Evenly matched — GSIW and MKTX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PFIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NDAQ five years ago would be worth $17,036 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $143 for GSIW. Over the past 12 months, PFIS leads with a +34.0% total return vs GSIW's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFIS at 19.5% vs GSIW's -75.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …MKTX logoMKTXMarketAxess Holdi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.1%+23.7%-7.6%-2.1%-14.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-64.8%+34.0%+14.6%-10.4%-31.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+70.7%+67.4%+50.8%-46.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+57.5%+70.4%+43.4%-61.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+93.9%+347.6%+225.3%+38.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-75.7%+19.5%+18.7%+14.7%-18.6%
PFIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PFIS and MKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MKTX is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSIW's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFIS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs GSIW's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …MKTX logoMKTXMarketAxess Holdi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.04x0.82x0.78x0.33x-0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$358.00$59.86$101.79$189.35$232.84
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.15$43.64$77.09$143.17$146.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.2%+98.5%+87.4%+82.5%+65.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.460.752.638.826.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded62K53K3.3M3.0M456K
Evenly matched — PFIS and MKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PFIS and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PFIS as "Hold", NDAQ as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", MKTX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.8% upside for NDAQ (target: $115) vs -5.0% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, PFIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.15% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …MKTX logoMKTXMarketAxess Holdi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$56.00$114.60$195.71$195.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts1363623
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%+1.2%+1.2%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises19131412
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.45$1.04$1.93$3.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.2%+1.6%+7.7%
Evenly matched — PFIS and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PFIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MKTX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallPeoples Financial Services … (PFIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the stronger pick with 296.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?

On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Nasdaq, Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Peoples Financial Services Corp. wins at 1. 13x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 's 3. 03x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?

Over the past 5 years, Nasdaq, Inc.

(NDAQ) delivered a total return of +70. 4%, compared to -98. 6% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 6% versus GSIW's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketAxess Holdings Inc.

(MKTX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares's 2. 04β — meaning GSIW is approximately -825% more volatile than MKTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 81% for Nasdaq, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is pulling ahead at 296.

0% versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -8. 5% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?

MarketAxess Holdings Inc.

(MKTX) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus -79. 9% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKTX leads at 41. 2% versus -80. 0% for GSIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTX leads at 69. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 's 3. 03x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDAQ: 28. 8% to $114. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?

In this comparison, PFIS (4.

1% yield), MKTX (2. 0% yield), ICE (1. 2% yield), NDAQ (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GSIW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.

(MKTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 2. 0% yield). Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTX: +38. 3%, GSIW: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GSIW and PFIS and NDAQ and ICE and MKTX?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GSIW is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PFIS, NDAQ, ICE, MKTX pay a dividend while GSIW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GSIW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 147%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFIS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NDAQ

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKTX

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GSIW and PFIS and NDAQ and ICE and MKTX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GSIW: 296.0% · PFIS: 22.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.