Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Capital Markets
GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $457M | $590M | $50.59B | $88.45B | $5.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $281M | $8.22B | $12.64B | $849M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $59M | $1.91B | $3.30B | $310M |
| Gross Margin | 4.7% | 66.6% | 47.9% | 61.9% | 69.9% |
| Operating Margin | -80.0% | 25.7% | 28.4% | 38.7% | 41.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.0x | 22.6x | 19.5x | 18.6x |
| Total Debt | $199K | $258M | $9.93B | $20.28B | $285M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $625K | $58M | $814M | $837M | $520M |
GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garden Stage Limite… (GSIW) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Peoples Financial S… (PFIS) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
| Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) | 100 | 153.1 | +53.1% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 121.6 | +21.6% |
| MarketAxess Holding… (MKTX) | 100 | 52.1 | -47.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GSIW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 3.8%
PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
- PEG 1.13 vs MKTX's 3.03
- Beta 0.82, yield 4.1%, current ratio 8.76x
- NIM 3.1% vs GSIW's 0.4%
NDAQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 347.6% 10Y total return vs ICE's 225.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8%
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.33 vs GSIW's 2.04
Among these 5 stocks, MKTX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 18.6x), PEG 1.13 vs 3.03 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs GSIW's 2.04 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs GSIW's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8% |
GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFIS leads in 2 of 6 categories
MKTX leads 1 • GSIW leads 0 • NDAQ leads 0 • ICE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKTX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 2339.1x GSIW's $5M. MKTX is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIW's -79.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $281M | $8.2B | $12.6B | $849M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $80M | $3.1B | $6.5B | $443M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $59M | $1.9B | $3.3B | $310M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $43M | $2.0B | $4.3B | $236M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +66.6% | +47.9% | +61.9% | +69.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.0% | +25.7% | +28.4% | +38.7% | +41.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.9% | +21.1% | +21.8% | +26.1% | +29.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.3% | +15.4% | +24.2% | +33.9% | +44.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.7% | +95.1% | +33.8% | +23.1% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PFIS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 65% valuation discount to NDAQ's 28.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFIS offers better value at 1.25x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $457M | $590M | $50.6B | $88.4B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $456M | $790M | $59.7B | $107.9B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.39x | 10.03x | 28.80x | 27.06x | 22.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.02x | 22.65x | 19.48x | 18.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.25x | 2.70x | 3.05x | 3.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.94x | 20.14x | 16.71x | 11.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 84.53x | 2.10x | 6.16x | 7.00x | 6.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 68.14x | 1.14x | 4.19x | 3.08x | 4.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.61x | 25.44x | 20.62x | 14.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GSIW and MKTX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSIW delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for ICE. GSIW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NDAQ's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDAQ scores 9/9 vs MKTX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | +11.8% | +15.9% | +11.6% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +1.2% | +6.4% | +2.3% | +15.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | +7.7% | +8.1% | +7.5% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.1% | +2.4% | +10.2% | +9.5% | +25.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.50x | 0.81x | 0.70x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$425,481 | $200M | $9.1B | $19.4B | -$235M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $624,583 | $58M | $814M | $837M | $520M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $199,102 | $258M | $9.9B | $20.3B | $285M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.77x | 14.11x | 6.53x | 168.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NDAQ five years ago would be worth $17,036 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $143 for GSIW. Over the past 12 months, PFIS leads with a +34.0% total return vs GSIW's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFIS at 19.5% vs GSIW's -75.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | +23.7% | -7.6% | -2.1% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.8% | +34.0% | +14.6% | -10.4% | -31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +70.7% | +67.4% | +50.8% | -46.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +57.5% | +70.4% | +43.4% | -61.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +93.9% | +347.6% | +225.3% | +38.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.7% | +19.5% | +18.7% | +14.7% | -18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFIS and MKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTX is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSIW's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFIS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs GSIW's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 0.82x | 0.78x | 0.33x | -0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $358.00 | $59.86 | $101.79 | $189.35 | $232.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $43.64 | $77.09 | $143.17 | $146.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.2% | +98.5% | +87.4% | +82.5% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 60.7 | 52.6 | 38.8 | 26.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 53K | 3.3M | 3.0M | 456K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PFIS and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFIS as "Hold", NDAQ as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", MKTX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.8% upside for NDAQ (target: $115) vs -5.0% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, PFIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.15% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $56.00 | $114.60 | $195.71 | $195.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 36 | 36 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% | +1.2% | +1.2% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 9 | 13 | 14 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 | $1.04 | $1.93 | $3.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +1.6% | +7.7% |
PFIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MKTX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE vs MKTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the stronger pick with 296.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?
On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Nasdaq, Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Peoples Financial Services Corp. wins at 1. 13x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 's 3. 03x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?
Over the past 5 years, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) delivered a total return of +70. 4%, compared to -98. 6% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 6% versus GSIW's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares's 2. 04β — meaning GSIW is approximately -825% more volatile than MKTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 81% for Nasdaq, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is pulling ahead at 296.
0% versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -8. 5% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus -79. 9% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKTX leads at 41. 2% versus -80. 0% for GSIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTX leads at 69. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 's 3. 03x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDAQ: 28. 8% to $114. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX?
In this comparison, PFIS (4.
1% yield), MKTX (2. 0% yield), ICE (1. 2% yield), NDAQ (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GSIW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE or MKTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 2. 0% yield). Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTX: +38. 3%, GSIW: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GSIW and PFIS and NDAQ and ICE and MKTX?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GSIW is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PFIS, NDAQ, ICE, MKTX pay a dividend while GSIW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.