Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GTES vs ASTE vs CMI vs AGCO vs DE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
GTES vs ASTE vs CMI vs AGCO vs DE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $6.61B | $1.21B | $94.29B | $8.53B | $157.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.45B | $1.48B | $33.89B | $10.37B | $45.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $249M | $26M | $2.67B | $771M | $4.08B |
| Gross Margin | 40.1% | 26.1% | 25.4% | 24.9% | 34.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 3.7% | 11.2% | 6.9% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 14.2x | 25.9x | 20.4x | 32.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.51B | $320M | $8.11B | $2.69B | $63.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $812M | $72M | $2.85B | $862M | $8.28B |
GTES vs ASTE vs CMI vs AGCO vs DE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gates Industrial Co… (GTES) | 100 | 258.5 | +158.5% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
| AGCO Corporation (AGCO) | 100 | 213.2 | +113.2% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTES vs ASTE vs CMI vs AGCO vs DE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTES ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.56 vs CMI's 2.30
- Lower P/E (16.2x vs 32.5x), PEG 0.56 vs 1.99
ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5%
CMI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for dividends and momentum.
- 1.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs DE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +131.7% vs DE's +24.2%
- 7.8% ROA vs ASTE's 2.0%, ROIC 16.1% vs 6.2%
Among these 5 stocks, AGCO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 1.1%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs CMI's 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 32.5x), PEG 0.56 vs 1.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs ASTE's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs ASTE's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs DE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +131.7% vs DE's +24.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.8% ROA vs ASTE's 2.0%, ROIC 16.1% vs 6.2% |
GTES vs ASTE vs CMI vs AGCO vs DE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTES vs ASTE vs CMI vs AGCO vs DE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CMI leads in 3 of 6 categories
AGCO leads 1 • GTES leads 0 • ASTE leads 0 • DE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GTES and DE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DE is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.9B annually — 31.1x ASTE's $1.5B. DE is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASTE's 1.7%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $1.5B | $33.9B | $10.4B | $45.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $640M | $84M | $4.6B | $963M | $9.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $249M | $26M | $2.7B | $771M | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $421M | $44M | $2.7B | $546M | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +26.1% | +25.4% | +24.9% | +34.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +3.7% | +11.2% | +6.9% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +1.7% | +7.9% | +7.4% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +3.0% | +7.9% | +5.3% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | +20.3% | +2.7% | +14.3% | +16.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -90.3% | -21.0% | +4.4% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AGCO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, AGCO trades at a 64% valuation discount to CMI's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GTES offers better value at 0.94x vs CMI's 2.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.6B | $1.2B | $94.3B | $8.5B | $157.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $1.5B | $99.6B | $10.3B | $213.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.06x | 31.55x | 33.29x | 12.08x | 31.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.15x | 14.17x | 25.92x | 20.37x | 32.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | — | 2.95x | 1.05x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.20x | 14.36x | 20.03x | 10.08x | 20.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.92x | 0.86x | 2.80x | 0.85x | 3.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 1.80x | 7.06x | 1.92x | 6.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.34x | 56.50x | 39.52x | 11.52x | 48.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMI delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $4 for ASTE. ASTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DE's 2.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTES scores 8/9 vs DE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | +3.8% | +20.3% | +16.7% | +15.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +2.0% | +7.8% | +6.3% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +6.2% | +16.1% | +8.3% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +7.2% | +17.3% | +9.0% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.47x | 0.61x | 0.59x | 2.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $248M | $5.3B | $1.8B | $55.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $812M | $72M | $2.8B | $862M | $8.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $320M | $8.1B | $2.7B | $63.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.59x | 5.48x | 12.15x | 10.36x | 2.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMI five years ago would be worth $26,872 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,958 for ASTE. Over the past 12 months, CMI leads with a +131.7% total return vs DE's +24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMI at 46.5% vs AGCO's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | +19.0% | +31.1% | +11.5% | +24.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.2% | +40.5% | +131.7% | +25.9% | +24.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.7% | +31.7% | +214.6% | +1.4% | +57.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | -20.4% | +168.7% | -9.6% | +54.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +22.1% | +557.4% | +178.0% | +671.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.9% | +9.6% | +46.5% | +0.5% | +16.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMI and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMI currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs ASTE's 80.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 1.63x | 1.57x | 1.10x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.47 | $65.65 | $718.08 | $143.78 | $674.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.97 | $36.43 | $296.59 | $93.30 | $433.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +80.7% | +95.0% | +81.9% | +86.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 39.1 | 75.7 | 52.5 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 227K | 794K | 696K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CMI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GTES as "Buy", ASTE as "Buy", CMI as "Buy", AGCO as "Buy", DE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.7% upside for GTES (target: $31) vs -32.1% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, CMI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.11% vs ASTE's 0.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.83 | $36.00 | $621.10 | $127.29 | $680.54 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 12 | 51 | 29 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 21 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.51 | $7.61 | $1.16 | $6.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% | +0.7% |
CMI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AGCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GTES vs ASTE vs CMI vs AGCO vs DE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE?
On trailing P/E, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Cummins Inc. at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Astec Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Gates Industrial Corporation plc wins at 0. 56x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE?
Over the past 5 years, Cummins Inc.
(CMI) delivered a total return of +168. 7%, compared to -20. 4% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DE returned +671. 0% versus ASTE's +22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning ASTE is approximately 190% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -27. 7% for Cummins Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMI leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE?
Deere & Company (DE) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
3% net margin versus 2. 8% for Astec Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 4. 6% for ASTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTES leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 32. 5x for Deere & Company — 18. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTES: 18. 7% to $30. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE?
In this comparison, CMI (1.
1% yield), DE (1. 1% yield), AGCO (1. 0% yield), ASTE (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. GTES does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GTES or ASTE or CMI or AGCO or DE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, GTES: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTES and ASTE and CMI and AGCO and DE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GTES is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ASTE, CMI, AGCO, DE pay a dividend while GTES does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.