Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GTM vs YELP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
GTM vs YELP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $2.04B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.25B | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $124M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 84.8% | 90.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 6.0x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.81B | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $176M | $216M |
GTM vs YELP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | 100 | 13.0 | -87.0% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 123.1 | +23.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTM vs YELP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTM is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 13.7x)
- 9.9% margin vs YELP's 9.5%
YELP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.82
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 19.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs GTM's -80.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs GTM's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs YELP's 9.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs GTM's 1.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -19.9% vs GTM's -26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs GTM's 1.9%, ROIC 25.1% vs 5.6% |
GTM vs YELP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTM vs YELP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP and GTM operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $1.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.9% (GTM) to 9.5% (YELP).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $280M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $124M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | $281M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.8% | +90.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +19.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +175.0% | -16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
YELP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, YELP trades at a 25% valuation discount to GTM's 17.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, YELP's 6.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GTM's 11.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.00x | 12.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.97x | 13.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.67x | 6.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.63x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.24x | 5.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $8 for GTM. YELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTM's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTM scores 7/9 vs YELP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | +19.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +14.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +22.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $75M | -$174M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.56x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YELP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YELP five years ago would be worth $7,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for GTM. Over the past 12 months, YELP leads with a -19.9% total return vs GTM's -26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YELP at 0.5% vs GTM's -32.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.0% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.3% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.6% | +1.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.6% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.5% | +10.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.0% | +0.5% |
Risk & Volatility
YELP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTM's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YELP currently trades 69.1% from its 52-week high vs GTM's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.51 | $41.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.15 | $19.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.0% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.6M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTM as "Hold" and YELP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 37.4% upside for GTM (target: $9) vs -0.5% for YELP (target: $28).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.11 | $28.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +20.2% | +17.3% |
YELP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GTM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
GTM vs YELP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTM or YELP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM). Yelp Inc. (YELP) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTM or YELP?
On trailing P/E, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the cheapest at 12. 7x versus ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. at 17. 0x. On forward P/E, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTM or YELP?
Over the past 5 years, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) delivered a total return of -27. 9%, compared to -84. 6% for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YELP returned +10. 2% versus GTM's -80. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTM or YELP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GTM is approximately 111% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 120% for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTM or YELP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus 2. 9% for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. grew EPS 387. 5% year-over-year, compared to 19. 1% for Yelp Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTM or YELP?
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.
(GTM) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus 9. 9% for Yelp Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTM leads at 18. 1% versus 12. 6% for YELP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YELP leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTM or YELP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.
(GTM) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Yelp Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTM: 37. 4% to $9. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTM or YELP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GTM or YELP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YELP: +10. 2%, GTM: -80. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTM and YELP?
These companies operate in different sectors (GTM (Technology) and YELP (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.