Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GUTS vs RMTI vs NKTR vs NVAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
GUTS vs RMTI vs NKTR vs NVAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $115M | $31M | $1.69B | $1.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $17.39B | $55M | $596M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-97M | $-1.61B | $-164M | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.7% | 99.6% | 84.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -8.5% | -237.9% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 3.6x |
| Total Debt | $62M | $12M | $149M | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $82M | $16M | $15M | $241M |
GUTS vs RMTI vs NKTR vs NVAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fractyl Health, Inc… (GUTS) | 100 | 8.3 | -91.7% |
| Rockwell Medical, I… (RMTI) | 100 | 55.4 | -44.6% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 782.8 | +682.8% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 186.8 | +86.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GUTS vs RMTI vs NKTR vs NVAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GUTS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RMTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.22
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 3.98x
- -9.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
- Beta 1.22 vs GUTS's 2.15, lower leverage
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- -59.1% 10Y total return vs NVAX's -90.4%
- Beta 1.85, current ratio 4.97x
- +8.2% vs GUTS's -50.5%
NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 64.7% revenue growth vs GUTS's -100.0%
- -7.4% ROA vs RMTI's -28.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.7% revenue growth vs GUTS's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -9.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs GUTS's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs GUTS's -50.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -7.4% ROA vs RMTI's -28.6% |
GUTS vs RMTI vs NKTR vs NVAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GUTS vs RMTI vs NKTR vs NVAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RMTI leads in 3 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • GUTS leads 0 • NVAX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMTI and GUTS operate at a comparable scale, with $17.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -9.3% (RMTI) to -3.0% (NKTR). On growth, RMTI holds the edge at +915.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $17.4B | $55M | $596M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$96M | -$1.5B | -$130M | -$47M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$97M | -$1.6B | -$164M | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$91M | $2M | -$209M | -$96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +16.7% | +99.6% | +84.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -8.5% | -2.4% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -9.3% | -3.0% | -14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +0.0% | -3.8% | -16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +915.6% | -25.3% | -79.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +9.9% | -4.5% | -102.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RMTI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $115M | $31M | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $95M | $28M | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.40x | -5.21x | -8.57x | 3.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 2.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.44x | 30.64x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.00x | 0.76x | 15.66x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RMTI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NKTR delivers a -4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-46 for RMTI. RMTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GUTS's 6.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVAX scores 5/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.4% | -45.9% | -4.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -102.2% | -28.6% | -62.8% | -7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.2% | -11.0% | -57.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -101.2% | -10.1% | -55.7% | +100.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.52x | 0.34x | 1.66x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | -$3M | $134M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $82M | $16M | $15M | $241M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $62M | $12M | $149M | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.01x | -4.74x | -5.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NKTR five years ago would be worth $2,765 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs GUTS's -50.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs GUTS's -61.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -66.8% | -9.2% | +92.0% | +29.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.5% | -30.3% | +818.2% | +55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | -72.8% | +621.8% | +23.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | -92.4% | -72.3% | -94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | -99.0% | -59.1% | -90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.2% | -35.2% | +93.3% | +7.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RMTI and NVAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RMTI is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GUTS's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVAX currently trades 77.1% from its 52-week high vs GUTS's 24.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.15x | 1.22x | 1.85x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.03 | $2.10 | $109.00 | $11.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.38 | $0.74 | $7.99 | $5.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.7% | +37.2% | +76.5% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 35.7 | 53.4 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 259K | 991K | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GUTS as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 568.4% upside for GUTS (target: $5) vs 59.3% for NKTR (target: $133).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | — | $132.83 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 33 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
RMTI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
GUTS vs RMTI vs NKTR vs NVAX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GUTS or RMTI or NKTR or NVAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock (GUTS). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock (GUTS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GUTS or RMTI or NKTR or NVAX?
Over the past 5 years, Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) delivered a total return of -72.
3%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NKTR returned -59. 1% versus RMTI's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GUTS or RMTI or NKTR or NVAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rockwell Medical, Inc.
(RMTI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 15β — meaning GUTS is approximately 76% more volatile than RMTI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rockwell Medical, Inc. (RMTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 7% for Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GUTS or RMTI or NKTR or NVAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus -100. 0% for Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock (GUTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -495. 2% for Rockwell Medical, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RMTI leads at -1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GUTS or RMTI or NKTR or NVAX?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GUTS or RMTI or NKTR or NVAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GUTS or RMTI or NKTR or NVAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rockwell Medical, Inc.
(RMTI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22)). Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock (GUTS) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMTI: -99. 0%, GUTS: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GUTS and RMTI and NKTR and NVAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GUTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RMTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.