Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GWRE vs VEEV vs NOW vs HUBS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Software - Application
Software - Application
GWRE vs VEEV vs NOW vs HUBS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $11.80B | $27.35B | $96.96B | $12.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $3.20B | $13.96B | $3.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $189M | $909M | $1.76B | $100M |
| Gross Margin | 63.8% | 75.5% | 76.6% | 83.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 28.7% | 13.4% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 39.7x | 19.0x | 22.5x | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $716M | $96M | $3.20B | $485M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $699M | $1.42B | $3.73B | $882M |
GWRE vs VEEV vs NOW vs HUBS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
| Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) | 100 | 76.9 | -23.1% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 122.2 | +22.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GWRE vs VEEV vs NOW vs HUBS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GWRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.61
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth 11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- Beta 0.61, current ratio 2.77x
- 22.6% revenue growth vs VEEV's 16.3%
VEEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs GWRE's 151.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 4.89x
- Lower P/E (19.0x vs 39.7x)
- 28.4% margin vs HUBS's 3.0%
NOW is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.32 vs VEEV's 1.04
HUBS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.6% revenue growth vs VEEV's 16.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.0x vs 39.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs HUBS's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs NOW's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -29.4% vs NOW's -90.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC 12.9% vs 0.4% |
GWRE vs VEEV vs NOW vs HUBS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GWRE vs VEEV vs NOW vs HUBS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VEEV leads in 3 of 6 categories
GWRE leads 0 • NOW leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VEEV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.0B annually — 10.4x GWRE's $1.3B. VEEV is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUBS's 3.0%. On growth, GWRE holds the edge at +24.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $3.2B | $14.0B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $956M | $2.7B | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $189M | $909M | $1.8B | $100M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $310M | $1.4B | $4.6B | $712M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +75.5% | +76.6% | +83.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +28.7% | +13.4% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +28.4% | +12.6% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +43.7% | +33.2% | +21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +16.0% | +22.1% | +23.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +23.9% | +2.3% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
VEEV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, VEEV trades at a 89% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NOW offers better value at 0.81x vs VEEV's 1.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.8B | $27.4B | $97.0B | $12.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.8B | $26.0B | $96.4B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 172.32x | 30.92x | 56.04x | 284.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.70x | 18.98x | 22.51x | 19.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.70x | 0.81x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 182.26x | 28.40x | 37.64x | 69.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.81x | 8.56x | 7.30x | 4.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.23x | 3.89x | 7.56x | 6.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.98x | 19.33x | 21.19x | 17.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VEEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NOW delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $5 for HUBS. VEEV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GWRE's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWRE scores 7/9 vs NOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +13.4% | +15.0% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +11.1% | +7.5% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +12.9% | +12.4% | +0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +13.8% | +13.2% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.01x | 0.25x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$1.3B | -$523M | -$397M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $699M | $1.4B | $3.7B | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $716M | $96M | $3.2B | $485M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 388.85x | — | 185.08x | 4753.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GWRE and VEEV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GWRE five years ago would be worth $14,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,935 for NOW. Over the past 12 months, VEEV leads with a -29.4% total return vs NOW's -90.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GWRE at 21.6% vs NOW's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.6% | -23.4% | -36.5% | -36.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.5% | -29.4% | -90.5% | -62.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.6% | -5.2% | -78.7% | -45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.4% | -35.3% | -80.6% | -52.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.9% | +519.4% | +38.8% | +469.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | -1.8% | -40.3% | -18.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GWRE and VEEV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOW's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VEEV currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.77x | 1.46x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $272.60 | $310.50 | $1057.39 | $682.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.57 | $148.05 | $81.24 | $187.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.2% | +54.2% | +8.9% | +35.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 49.6 | 41.5 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 2.3M | 21.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GWRE as "Buy", VEEV as "Buy", NOW as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.6% upside for GWRE (target: $245) vs 47.7% for HUBS (target: $361).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.17 | $280.10 | $151.52 | $360.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 42 | 68 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +1.9% | +4.0% |
VEEV leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
GWRE vs VEEV vs NOW vs HUBS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the stronger pick with 22. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 3% for Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV). Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Guidewire Software, Inc. (GWRE) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS?
On trailing P/E, Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the cheapest at 30. 9x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, Veeva Systems Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServiceNow, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS?
Over the past 5 years, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) delivered a total return of +41. 4%, compared to -80. 6% for ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VEEV returned +519. 4% versus NOW's +38. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus ServiceNow, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning NOW is approximately 139% more volatile than GWRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for Guidewire Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is pulling ahead at 22. 6% versus 16. 3% for Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to 21. 9% for ServiceNow, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOW leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS?
Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus 1. 5% for HubSpot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VEEV leads at 28. 7% versus 0. 4% for HUBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) trades at 19. 0x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for Guidewire Software, Inc. — 20. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 75. 6% to $245. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GWRE or VEEV or NOW or HUBS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), +519. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VEEV: +519. 4%, NOW: +38. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GWRE and VEEV and NOW and HUBS?
These companies operate in different sectors (GWRE (Technology) and VEEV (Healthcare) and NOW (Technology) and HUBS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.