GXO vs RXO vs XPO vs CHRW

For growth investors, RXO, Inc.

(RXO) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the better valuation at 35. 5x trailing P/E (27. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, C.

H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the cheapest at 35. 5x versus GXO Logistics, Inc. at 184. 3x. On forward P/E, GXO Logistics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPO Logistics, Inc. wins at 1. 52x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) delivered a total return of +298. 9%, compared to -5. 3% for GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 2% versus GXO's -5. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C.

H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus RXO, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning RXO is approximately 174% more volatile than CHRW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RXO, Inc. (RXO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 3% for GXO Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RXO, Inc.

(RXO) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RXO, Inc. grew EPS 72. 8% year-over-year, compared to -75. 0% for GXO Logistics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GXO leads at 13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus -1. 7% for RXO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPO leads at 8. 9% versus -0. 1% for RXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RXO leads at 17. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 19x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) trades at 17. 0x forward P/E versus 1250. 0x for RXO, Inc. — 1233. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GXO: 39. 8% to $72. 14.

In this comparison, CHRW (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. GXO, RXO, XPO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, C.

H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), 1. 4% yield, +163. 6% 10Y return). RXO, Inc. (RXO) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHRW: +163. 6%, RXO: +3. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GXO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RXO is a small-cap high-growth stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CHRW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CHRW pays a dividend while GXO, RXO, XPO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.