Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HBT vs BFST vs FFIN vs BANF vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
HBT vs BFST vs FFIN vs BANF vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $895M | $916M | $4.58B | $3.70B | $22.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $293M | $512M | $739M | $909M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $77M | $88M | $243M | $238M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 80.0% | 60.9% | 70.8% | 68.5% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 35.6% | 22.2% | 36.8% | 30.3% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 9.4x | 15.8x | 15.2x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $65M | $551M | $197M | $86M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $411M | $763M | $3.55B | $599M |
HBT vs BFST vs FFIN vs BANF vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) | 100 | 223.9 | +123.9% |
| Business First Banc… (BFST) | 100 | 193.3 | +93.3% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 292.0 | +192.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 31.4 | -68.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBT vs BFST vs FFIN vs BANF vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 3.9% vs FFIN's 3.1%
- +21.7% vs FIS's -42.8%
BFST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs HBT's 2.8%
- 30.2% margin vs BFST's 17.2%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.7%
BANF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 309.6% 10Y total return vs HBT's 112.7%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.29 vs FFIN's 3.03
- Beta 0.65, yield 3.7%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs HBT's 2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 15.2x), PEG 0.29 vs 1.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs BFST's 17.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs BANF's 0.91 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.7% vs FIS's -42.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs BFST's 1.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs 6.2% |
HBT vs BFST vs FFIN vs BANF vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HBT vs BFST vs FFIN vs BANF vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
BFST leads 1 • HBT leads 1 • BANF leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 39.7x HBT's $293M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFST's 17.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $293M | $512M | $739M | $909M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $110M | $119M | $310M | $324M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $77M | $88M | $243M | $238M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $88M | $290M | $196M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.0% | +60.9% | +70.8% | +68.5% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +22.2% | +36.8% | +30.3% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +17.2% | +30.2% | +23.8% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +18.0% | +39.6% | +24.7% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +39.2% | -7.7% | +5.7% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BFST leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, BFST trades at a 83% valuation discount to FIS's 58.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BFST offers better value at 0.91x vs FFIN's 3.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $895M | $916M | $4.6B | $3.7B | $22.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $936M | $1.1B | $4.0B | $230M | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.67x | 10.08x | 20.63x | 17.28x | 58.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.69x | 9.37x | 15.82x | 15.22x | 6.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.92x | 0.91x | 3.96x | 1.78x | 2.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.54x | 8.87x | 14.07x | 0.77x | 7.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.05x | 1.79x | 6.20x | 4.07x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 0.93x | 2.87x | 2.31x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.26x | 9.94x | 15.64x | 16.47x | 8.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BANF and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $10 for BFST. BANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BFST's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBT scores 9/9 vs BANF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +10.2% | +13.3% | +13.3% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.1% | +1.6% | +1.7% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +6.2% | +11.0% | +12.8% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +8.9% | +16.0% | +15.7% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.61x | 0.12x | 0.05x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $41M | $140M | -$566M | -$3.5B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $411M | $763M | $3.6B | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $551M | $197M | $86M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 0.59x | 1.48x | 1.11x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBT five years ago would be worth $17,603 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,474 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, HBT leads with a +21.7% total return vs FIS's -42.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFST at 25.2% vs FIS's -5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +9.4% | +7.9% | +5.0% | -32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.7% | +20.5% | -5.0% | -10.1% | -42.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.9% | +96.3% | +24.0% | +35.4% | -15.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.0% | +25.5% | -28.6% | +66.6% | -65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.7% | +26.3% | +133.5% | +309.6% | -19.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.6% | +25.2% | +7.4% | +10.6% | -5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HBT and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BANF's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 52.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.89x | 0.91x | 0.91x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.88 | $30.32 | $38.74 | $138.77 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.36 | $22.52 | $28.11 | $101.48 | $41.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +92.4% | +83.1% | +80.2% | +52.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 54.8 | 54.1 | 50.0 | 39.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 174K | 674K | 134K | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and BANF and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBT as "Buy", BFST as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", BANF as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for FIS (target: $64) vs -14.7% for BANF (target: $95). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.74% vs BANF's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | $32.33 | $39.25 | $95.00 | $63.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 4 | 15 | 3 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.0% | +2.2% | +1.5% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.85 | $0.57 | $0.72 | $1.72 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.3% |
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BFST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HBT vs BFST vs FFIN vs BANF vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT). Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc.
(BFST) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 58. 2x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 29x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, HBT Financial, Inc.
(HBT) delivered a total return of +76. 0%, compared to -65. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +309. 6% versus FIS's -19. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus BancFirst Corporation's 0. 91β — meaning BANF is approximately 40% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 61% for Business First Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus 2. 8% for HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Business First Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 23. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBT leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 45. 5% to $63. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 5% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
09Is HBT or BFST or FFIN or BANF or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -19. 1%, BFST: +26. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBT and BFST and FFIN and BANF and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HBT (Financial Services) and BFST (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and BANF (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HBT is a small-cap deep-value stock; BFST is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.