Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCWC vs BTMD vs HIMS vs OPRX vs DOCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
HCWC vs BTMD vs HIMS vs OPRX vs DOCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $5M | $96M | $7.30B | $120M | $5.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $78M | $188M | $2.35B | $109M | $638M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $16M | $128M | $5M | $239M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 70.1% | 69.7% | 67.3% | 89.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | 15.4% | 4.6% | 10.7% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.9x | 58.3x | 6.8x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $110M | $1.12B | $5M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $24M | $229M | $23M | $210M |
HCWC vs BTMD vs HIMS vs OPRX vs DOCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Choice Well… (HCWC) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| biote Corp. (BTMD) | 100 | 39.1 | -60.9% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 153.5 | +53.5% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 83.4 | -16.6% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 59.6 | -40.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCWC vs BTMD vs HIMS vs OPRX vs DOCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCWC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- -23.7% vs DOCS's -56.2%
BTMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (2.9x vs 16.8x)
- 2.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 188.5% 10Y total return vs DOCS's -51.0%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs BTMD's -2.5%
OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.14
DOCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.97x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 6.97x
- 37.5% margin vs HCWC's -5.0%
- Beta 0.99 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs BTMD's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.9x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs HCWC's -5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -23.7% vs DOCS's -56.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs HCWC's -11.4%, ROIC 20.0% vs -8.9% |
HCWC vs BTMD vs HIMS vs OPRX vs DOCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HCWC vs BTMD vs HIMS vs OPRX vs DOCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCWC leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • OPRX leads 1 • BTMD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 30.0x HCWC's $78M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HCWC's -5.0%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $78M | $188M | $2.3B | $109M | $638M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $32M | $164M | $16M | $250M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $16M | $128M | $5M | $239M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $675,420 | $29M | $73M | $12M | $314M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +70.1% | +69.7% | +67.3% | +89.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +15.4% | +4.6% | +10.7% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | +8.3% | +5.5% | +4.7% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +15.2% | +3.1% | +10.6% | +49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | -8.3% | +28.4% | -0.2% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.5% | -83.8% | -27.3% | — | -16.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HCWC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.9x trailing earnings, BTMD trades at a 95% valuation discount to HIMS's 55.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HCWC's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 46.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $96M | $7.3B | $120M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $182M | $8.2B | $101M | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.21x | 2.95x | 55.43x | 23.85x | 23.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 58.29x | 6.84x | 16.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.60x | 4.64x | 46.50x | 6.33x | 21.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 0.50x | 3.11x | 1.10x | 9.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | — | 13.50x | 0.95x | 4.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.11x | 3.19x | 98.70x | 6.43x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-75 for HCWC. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.6% | — | +23.7% | +4.2% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.4% | +15.1% | +6.0% | +3.0% | +20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.9% | +11.3% | +10.7% | +7.1% | +20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.6% | +53.3% | +10.9% | +7.6% | +22.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | — | 2.07x | 0.04x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | $86M | $892M | -$19M | -$197M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $24M | $229M | $23M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $110M | $1.1B | $5M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.88x | 3.02x | — | 1.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $27,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $553 for HCWC. Over the past 12 months, HCWC leads with a -23.7% total return vs DOCS's -56.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 33.6% vs HCWC's -61.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.2% | -11.7% | -15.4% | -48.1% | -40.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.7% | -41.7% | -45.0% | -35.0% | -56.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -68.4% | +138.6% | -55.7% | -24.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -78.2% | +173.9% | -85.7% | -51.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -78.3% | +188.5% | +104.4% | -51.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.9% | -31.9% | +33.6% | -23.8% | -8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BTMD and DOCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOCS is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTMD currently trades 45.9% from its 52-week high vs OPRX's 28.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 1.69x | 2.48x | 2.14x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.98 | $4.75 | $70.43 | $22.25 | $76.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $1.27 | $13.74 | $5.54 | $20.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.6% | +45.9% | +40.1% | +28.9% | +34.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 53.9 | 50.2 | 49.9 | 62.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 445K | 268K | 34.8M | 475K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
OPRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", OPRX as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 164.0% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs -7.3% for HIMS (target: $26). BTMD is the only dividend payer here at 2.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $26.20 | $17.00 | $42.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 19 | 15 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.05 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +2.3% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HCWC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HCWC vs BTMD vs HIMS vs OPRX vs DOCS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for biote Corp. (BTMD). biote Corp. (BTMD) offers the better valuation at 2. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS?
On trailing P/E, biote Corp.
(BTMD) is the cheapest at 2. 9x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to -94. 5% for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. (HCWC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +188. 5% versus HCWC's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 150% more volatile than DOCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 5% for biote Corp. (BTMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: biote Corp. grew EPS 703. 5% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -5. 0% for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -3. 2% for HCWC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 6.
8x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 51. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 164. 0% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS?
In this comparison, BTMD (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. HCWC, HIMS, OPRX, DOCS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HCWC or BTMD or HIMS or OPRX or DOCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99)). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOCS: -51. 0%, OPRX: +104. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCWC and BTMD and HIMS and OPRX and DOCS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HCWC (Consumer Defensive) and BTMD (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and OPRX (Healthcare) and DOCS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HCWC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock. BTMD pays a dividend while HCWC, HIMS, OPRX, DOCS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.