Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR vs HRTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR vs HRTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $3.45B | $263M | $33.42B | $3.01B | $688M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.42B | $-12M | $19.93B | $978M | $776M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $-4M | $4.40B | $197M | $202M |
| Gross Margin | 78.0% | 29.6% | 37.2% | 60.6% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | -4.3% | 25.0% | 25.9% | 34.8% |
| Forward P/E | 271.2x | — | 10.0x | 11.8x | 4.9x |
| Total Debt | $233M | $1M | $2.73B | $7M | $100M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $299M | $52M | $993M | $107M | $559M |
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR vs HRTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 240.9 | +140.9% |
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 150.2 | +50.2% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 261.2 | +161.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR vs HRTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HGTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 0.2%
- Beta 0.46, yield 0.2%
- 0.2% yield, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NODK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs PLMR's -29.2%
Among these 5 stocks, ACGL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PLMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 496.9% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 321.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 0.8%
- 58.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -12.3%
HRTG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.06 vs ACGL's 0.35
- Lower P/E (4.9x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.06 vs 0.12
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs NODK's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
- 8.8% ROA vs NODK's -0.9%, ROIC 15.4% vs -4.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -12.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.9x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.06 vs 0.12 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs NODK's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs NODK's 0.53 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs PLMR's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs NODK's -0.9%, ROIC 15.4% vs -4.8% |
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR vs HRTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR vs HRTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRTG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACGL leads 1 • HGTY leads 0 • NODK leads 0 • PLMR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLMR and HRTG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL and NODK operate at a comparable scale, with $19.9B and -$12M in trailing revenue. HRTG is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NODK's -3.7%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +59.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | -$12M | $19.9B | $978M | $776M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $123M | -$4M | $5.2B | $267M | $280M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | -$4M | $4.4B | $197M | $202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | -$27M | $6.1B | $318M | $203M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.0% | +29.6% | +37.2% | +60.6% | +35.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -4.3% | +25.0% | +25.9% | +34.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -3.7% | +22.1% | +20.2% | +26.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | -5.4% | +30.7% | +32.6% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | -16.6% | +7.3% | +59.7% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -191.2% | +93.5% | +39.0% | 0.0% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 87% valuation discount to HGTY's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.04x vs ACGL's 0.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $263M | $33.4B | $3.0B | $688M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $213M | $35.2B | $2.9B | $229M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.19x | -25.62x | 8.07x | 15.81x | 3.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 271.16x | — | 10.04x | 11.76x | 4.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.28x | 0.16x | 0.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.17x | — | 6.80x | 11.08x | 0.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.37x | 0.92x | 1.68x | 3.43x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.67x | 1.12x | 1.46x | 3.31x | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.76x | — | 5.45x | 7.48x | 3.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 43.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NODK. NODK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HGTY's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACGL scores 7/9 vs NODK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | -1.8% | +19.0% | +21.7% | +43.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -0.9% | +5.9% | +6.8% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.9% | -4.8% | +15.4% | +25.5% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.4% | -9.5% | +11.6% | +11.3% | +38.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.01x | 0.11x | 0.01x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | -$50M | $1.7B | -$100M | -$459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $299M | $52M | $993M | $107M | $559M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $233M | $1M | $2.7B | $7M | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.01x | — | 34.86x | 74.08x | 31.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $24,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,861 for NODK. Over the past 12 months, NODK leads with a +5.1% total return vs PLMR's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 76.3% vs NODK's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.5% | -3.5% | -0.1% | -14.0% | -17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.7% | +5.1% | -0.8% | -29.2% | -12.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | -3.5% | +29.8% | +123.6% | +447.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | -31.4% | +147.5% | +71.4% | +149.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | -13.2% | +321.0% | +496.9% | +77.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | -1.2% | +9.1% | +30.8% | +76.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NODK's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs PLMR's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.53x | -0.01x | 0.18x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $14.70 | $103.39 | $175.85 | $31.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.81 | $12.01 | $82.45 | $107.75 | $16.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +87.1% | +90.7% | +64.5% | +70.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 48.2 | 45.7 | 34.6 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 171K | 17K | 1.9M | 234K | 309K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HGTY and PLMR and HRTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HGTY as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", PLMR as "Buy", HRTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.0% upside for HRTG (target: $39) vs -2.7% for PLMR (target: $110). HGTY is the only dividend payer here at 0.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.33 | — | $104.00 | $110.25 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — | 34 | 11 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | $0.02 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +5.7% | +1.2% | +0.3% |
HRTG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ACGL leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR vs HRTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 3. 5x versus Hagerty, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +149. 6%, compared to -31. 4% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLMR returned +496. 9% versus NODK's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus NI Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 53β — meaning NODK is approximately -4669% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 31% for Hagerty, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus -12. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hagerty, Inc. grew EPS 270. 0% year-over-year, compared to -308. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG?
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus -3. 7% for NI Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRTG leads at 30. 6% versus -4. 3% for NODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HGTY leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 4. 9x forward P/E versus 271. 2x for Hagerty, Inc. — 266. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRTG: 74. 0% to $39. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG?
In this comparison, HGTY (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NODK, ACGL, PLMR, HRTG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR or HRTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), +321. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACGL: +321. 0%, NODK: -13. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HGTY and NODK and ACGL and PLMR and HRTG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HGTY is a small-cap high-growth stock; NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.