Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Industrial - Machinery
Insurance - Property & Casualty
HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Oil & Gas Integrated | Industrial - Machinery | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $714M | $77M | $9.93B | $4.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $480M | $61M | $4.26B | $821M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $113M | $-4M | $40M | $-139M |
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 16.6% | 32.6% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.2% | -0.0% | 8.5% | -16.3% |
| Forward P/E | 114.3x | — | 16.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $52M | $9M | $3.74B | $182M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250M | $7M | $366M | $385M |
HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
| Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG) | 100 | 148.0 | +48.0% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 172.7 | +72.7% |
| Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) | 100 | 37.5 | -62.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 25.9%, EPS growth 235.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 57.6%
- 23.4% margin vs LMND's -16.9%
- 6.0% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 22.8% vs -36.8%
SLNG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GTLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs LMND's -21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.56, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.36x
LMND is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and momentum.
- 40.2% revenue growth vs SLNG's -6.9%
- +78.2% vs SLNG's -28.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs SLNG's -6.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.4% margin vs LMND's -16.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs LMND's 2.75 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.2% vs SLNG's -28.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 22.8% vs -36.8% |
HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIPO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SLNG leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • LMND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 69.6x SLNG's $61M. HIPO is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $480M | $61M | $4.3B | $821M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $116M | $5M | $644M | -$121M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $113M | -$4M | $40M | -$139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | $12M | $203M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.5% | +16.6% | +32.6% | +47.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | -0.0% | +8.5% | -16.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | -6.3% | +0.9% | -16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +20.1% | +4.8% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.2% | -40.1% | -2.5% | +55.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.1% | -155.8% | -36.1% | +45.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SLNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, HIPO trades at a 98% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HIPO's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLNG's 16.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $714M | $77M | $9.9B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $517M | $79M | $13.3B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.36x | -57.14x | 628.45x | -23.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 114.33x | — | 16.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.16x | 16.31x | 14.33x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.52x | 1.13x | 2.33x | 5.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 1.16x | 2.79x | 7.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.49x | 167.45x | 48.95x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIPO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIPO delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. HIPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIPO scores 5/9 vs SLNG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.4% | -5.9% | +1.2% | -26.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | -4.2% | +0.4% | -7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.8% | -2.8% | +7.4% | -36.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | -3.4% | +8.6% | -22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.13x | 1.11x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$198M | $1M | $3.4B | -$203M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250M | $7M | $366M | $385M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $9M | $3.7B | $182M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.44x | 1.08x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GTLS and LMND each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $12,951 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,105 for HIPO. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +78.2% total return vs SLNG's -28.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMND at 49.6% vs SLNG's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.5% | -9.2% | +0.6% | -28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | -28.6% | +37.6% | +78.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.3% | +30.4% | +62.7% | +234.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -48.6% | +29.5% | -31.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | -80.5% | +772.5% | -21.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.0% | +9.3% | +17.6% | +49.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLNG and GTLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs LMND's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | -0.44x | 0.56x | 2.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.98 | $6.36 | $208.51 | $99.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.92 | $3.21 | $140.50 | $28.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.4% | +65.4% | +99.5% | +54.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 57.4 | 51.2 | 36.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 51K | 1.6M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
GTLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIPO as "Buy", SLNG as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", LMND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for LMND (target: $73) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.38 | — | $193.81 | $72.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 1 | 37 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.60 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HIPO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLNG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (114. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND?
On trailing P/E, Hippo Holdings Inc.
(HIPO) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to -88. 9% for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus HIPO's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
(SLNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 44β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately -727% more volatile than SLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hippo Holdings Inc. grew EPS 235. 4% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIPO leads at 57. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND?
Hippo Holdings Inc.
(HIPO) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIPO leads at 50. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 114. 3x for Hippo Holdings Inc. — 97. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMND: 33. 5% to $72. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND?
In this comparison, GTLS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. HIPO, SLNG, LMND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
(SLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 44)). Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) carries a higher beta of 2. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLNG: -80. 5%, LMND: -21. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIPO and SLNG and GTLS and LMND?
These companies operate in different sectors (HIPO (Financial Services) and SLNG (Energy) and GTLS (Industrials) and LMND (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HIPO is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLNG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.