Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND vs ROOT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HIPO
Hippo Holdings Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$714M
5Y Perf.-90.4%
SLNG
Stabilis Solutions, Inc.

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$77M
5Y Perf.+48.0%
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+72.7%
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.18B
5Y Perf.-62.5%
ROOT
Root, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$798M
5Y Perf.-84.3%

HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND vs ROOT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HIPO logoHIPO
SLNG logoSLNG
GTLS logoGTLS
LMND logoLMND
ROOT logoROOT
IndustryInsurance - SpecialtyOil & Gas IntegratedIndustrial - MachineryInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$714M$77M$9.93B$4.18B$798M
Revenue (TTM)$480M$61M$4.26B$821M$1.56B
Net Income (TTM)$113M$-4M$40M$-139M$56M
Gross Margin40.5%16.6%32.6%47.6%17.9%
Operating Margin24.2%-0.0%8.5%-16.3%4.1%
Forward P/E114.3x16.4x29.0x
Total Debt$52M$9M$3.74B$182M$201M
Cash & Equiv.$250M$7M$366M$385M$690M

HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND vs ROOTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HIPO
SLNG
GTLS
LMND
ROOT
StockJan 21May 26Return
Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO)1009.6-90.4%
Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG)100148.0+48.0%
Chart Industries, I… (GTLS)100172.7+72.7%
Lemonade, Inc. (LMND)10037.5-62.5%
Root, Inc. (ROOT)10015.7-84.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND vs ROOT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GTLS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Hippo Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. LMND also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HIPO
Hippo Holdings Inc.
The Insurance Pick

HIPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 23.4% margin vs LMND's -16.9%
  • 6.0% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 22.8% vs -36.8%
Best for: quality and efficiency
SLNG
Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

SLNG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick

GTLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
  • 7.7% 10Y total return vs LMND's -21.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.36x
  • Beta 0.56, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.36x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

LMND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth and momentum.

  • 40.2% revenue growth vs SLNG's -6.9%
  • +78.2% vs ROOT's -59.3%
Best for: growth and momentum
ROOT
Root, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ROOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 29.0%, EPS growth 22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMND logoLMND40.2% revenue growth vs SLNG's -6.9%
ValueGTLS logoGTLSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHIPO logoHIPO23.4% margin vs LMND's -16.9%
Stability / SafetyGTLS logoGTLSBeta 0.56 vs LMND's 2.75
DividendsGTLS logoGTLS0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LMND logoLMND+78.2% vs ROOT's -59.3%
Efficiency (ROA)HIPO logoHIPO6.0% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 22.8% vs -36.8%

HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND vs ROOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HIPOHippo Holdings Inc.
FY 2024
Services Segment
100.0%$48M
SLNGStabilis Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Natural Gas, Gathering, Transportation, Marketing and Processing
83.8%$57M
Rental
7.8%$5M
Service
7.3%$5M
Product and Service, Other
1.0%$667,000
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Repair, Service And Leasing Segment
30.6%$1.3B
Heat Transfer Systems Segment
29.0%$1.2B
Specialty Products Segment
25.8%$1.1B
Cryo Tank Solutions Segment
14.6%$624M
LMNDLemonade, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$738M
ROOTRoot, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND vs ROOT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHIPOLAGGINGLMND

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 69.6x SLNG's $61M. HIPO is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…SLNG logoSLNGStabilis Solution…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$480M$61M$4.3B$821M$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$116M$5M$644M-$121M$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$113M-$4M$40M-$139M$56M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$50M$12M$203M$20M$181M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.5%+16.6%+32.6%+47.6%+17.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+24.2%-0.0%+8.5%-16.3%+4.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.4%-6.3%+0.9%-16.9%+3.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.4%+20.1%+4.8%+2.4%+11.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.2%-40.1%-2.5%+55.0%+12.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+114.1%-155.8%-36.1%+45.3%+95.3%
HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, HIPO trades at a 98% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROOT's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLNG's 16.3x.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…SLNG logoSLNGStabilis Solution…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$714M$77M$9.9B$4.2B$798M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$517M$79M$13.3B$4.0B$309M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.36x-57.14x628.45x-23.67x25.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.114.33x16.40x29.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.16x16.31x14.33x5.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.52x1.13x2.33x5.67x0.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.64x1.16x2.79x7.33x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF78.49x167.45x48.95x4.15x
ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HIPO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIPO delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. HIPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROOT scores 6/9 vs SLNG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…SLNG logoSLNGStabilis Solution…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+27.4%-5.9%+1.2%-26.5%+15.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.0%-4.2%+0.4%-7.4%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.8%-2.8%+7.4%-36.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%-3.4%+8.6%-22.7%+3.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.13x1.11x0.34x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$198M$1M$3.4B-$203M-$489M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$250M$7M$366M$385M$690M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$52M$9M$3.7B$182M$201M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.44x1.08x1.86x
HIPO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GTLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $12,951 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,105 for HIPO. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +78.2% total return vs ROOT's -59.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROOT at 117.4% vs SLNG's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…SLNG logoSLNGStabilis Solution…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.5%-9.2%+0.6%-28.3%-19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+12.2%-28.6%+37.6%+78.2%-59.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.3%+30.4%+62.7%+234.7%+927.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.9%-48.6%+29.5%-31.2%-69.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.5%-80.5%+772.5%-21.6%-88.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.0%+9.3%+17.6%+49.6%+117.4%
GTLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SLNG and GTLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SLNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs ROOT's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…SLNG logoSLNGStabilis Solution…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x-0.44x0.56x2.75x2.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.98$6.36$208.51$99.90$162.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.92$3.21$140.50$28.71$40.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.4%+65.4%+99.5%+54.5%+34.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.957.451.236.356.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded110K51K1.6M1.9M330K
Evenly matched — SLNG and GTLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GTLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: HIPO as "Buy", SLNG as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", LMND as "Buy", ROOT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for LMND (target: $73) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…SLNG logoSLNGStabilis Solution…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.38$193.81$72.67$75.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts61371514
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
GTLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

HIPO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GTLS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallHippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HIPO vs SLNG vs GTLS vs LMND vs ROOT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (114. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT?

On trailing P/E, Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT?

Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to -88. 9% for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus HIPO's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stabilis Solutions, Inc.

(SLNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 44β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately -727% more volatile than SLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hippo Holdings Inc. grew EPS 235. 4% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT?

Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIPO leads at 50. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 114. 3x for Hippo Holdings Inc. — 97. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMND: 33. 5% to $72. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT?

In this comparison, GTLS (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. HIPO, SLNG, LMND, ROOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HIPO or SLNG or GTLS or LMND or ROOT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stabilis Solutions, Inc.

(SLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 44)). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLNG: -80. 5%, ROOT: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HIPO and SLNG and GTLS and LMND and ROOT?

These companies operate in different sectors (HIPO (Financial Services) and SLNG (Energy) and GTLS (Industrials) and LMND (Financial Services) and ROOT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HIPO is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLNG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; ROOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HIPO

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLNG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GTLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ROOT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HIPO and SLNG and GTLS and LMND and ROOT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HIPO: 10.2% · SLNG: -40.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.