Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HKD vs CNF vs FUTU vs QFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Credit Services
HKD vs CNF vs FUTU vs QFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $333M | $1M | $51.52B | $3.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $626M | $13.59B | $17.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $160M | $-51M | $7.91B | $6.89B |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 87.0% | 82.0% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 33.5% | -11.2% | 48.7% | 43.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 4.3x | 1.5x | 0.5x |
| Total Debt | $258M | $4.22B | $8.55B | $1.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $338M | $11.69B | $4.45B |
HKD vs CNF vs FUTU vs QFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| CNFinance Holdings … (CNF) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 347.6 | +247.6% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 90.6 | -9.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HKD vs CNF vs FUTU vs QFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HKD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 179.1% margin vs CNF's -73.1%
- 22.3% ROA vs CNF's -0.4%, ROIC 0.6% vs -0.6%
CNF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.09
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 7.3x)
- Beta 0.09 vs FUTU's 2.04
FUTU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth 27.2%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs QFIN's 16.1%
- PEG 0.02 vs QFIN's 0.02
- 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs HKD's -94.0%
QFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 6.8%, current ratio 2.45x
- Beta 1.20, yield 9.3%, current ratio 2.45x
- NIM 14.3% vs CNF's 0.6%
- 9.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs HKD's -94.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 7.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 179.1% margin vs CNF's -73.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs FUTU's 2.04 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs QFIN's -63.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.3% ROA vs CNF's -0.4%, ROIC 0.6% vs -0.6% |
HKD vs CNF vs FUTU vs QFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HKD vs CNF vs FUTU vs QFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CNF leads in 1 of 6 categories
QFIN leads 1 • FUTU leads 1 • HKD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HKD and FUTU each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 191.7x HKD's $90M. HKD is the more profitable business, keeping 179.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNF's -73.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $626M | $13.6B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $198M | $10.0B | $8.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $160M | -$51M | $7.9B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $102M | $0 | $0 | $10.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.1% | +87.0% | +82.0% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | -11.2% | +48.7% | +43.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +179.1% | -73.1% | +40.1% | +36.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +113.6% | +12.6% | +2.3% | +53.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.7% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +176.0% | -8.5% | +112.0% | -9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CNF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, QFIN trades at a 93% valuation discount to FUTU's 29.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.11x vs FUTU's 0.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $333M | $1M | $51.5B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $562M | $571M | $51.1B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.35x | -0.02x | 29.18x | 2.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.29x | 1.52x | 0.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.30x | 0.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.66x | — | 58.89x | 2.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.20x | 0.01x | 29.69x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 0.00x | 5.67x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 81.49x | 0.09x | 13.09x | 2.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CNF. QFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HKD's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QFIN scores 7/9 vs HKD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.6% | -1.2% | +26.4% | +28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.3% | -0.4% | +4.6% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | -0.6% | +14.8% | +23.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | -0.9% | +25.1% | +35.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 1.18x | 0.31x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $229M | $3.9B | -$3.1B | -$2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $338M | $11.7B | $4.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $258M | $4.2B | $8.6B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.17x | -0.14x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUTU five years ago would be worth $11,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $915 for CNF. Over the past 12 months, FUTU leads with a +45.1% total return vs QFIN's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 53.6% vs CNF's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.1% | -46.8% | -17.4% | -22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.0% | -56.0% | +45.1% | -63.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | -88.0% | +262.2% | +0.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -90.9% | +15.0% | -19.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -95.8% | +875.5% | +16.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | -50.6% | +53.6% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNF and FUTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNF is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUTU's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUTU currently trades 71.5% from its 52-week high vs QFIN's 28.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.10x | 2.11x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.47 | $8.80 | $202.53 | $47.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.26 | $2.36 | $99.20 | $12.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.9% | +36.3% | +71.5% | +28.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 44.5 | 65.0 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 683K | 5K | 1.4M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUTU as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 53.2% for FUTU (target: $222). QFIN is the only dividend payer here at 9.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $222.00 | $28.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $8.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +23.7% | 0.0% | +11.6% |
CNF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). QFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
HKD vs CNF vs FUTU vs QFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -94. 0% for AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN?
On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Futu Holdings Limited at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Futu Holdings Limited wins at 0. 02x versus Qfin Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +15.
0%, compared to -90. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +873. 5% versus CNF's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus Futu Holdings Limited's 2. 11β — meaning FUTU is approximately 2030% more volatile than CNF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 162% for AMTD Digital Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus -94. 0% for AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -122. 3% for CNFinance Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN?
AMTD Digital Inc.
(HKD) is the more profitable company, earning 189. 5% net margin versus -73. 1% for CNFinance Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 189. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HKD leads at 51. 7% versus -11. 2% for CNF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNF leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Qfin Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for CNFinance Holdings Limited — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN?
In this comparison, QFIN (9.
3% yield) pays a dividend. HKD, CNF, FUTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HKD or CNF or FUTU or QFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
10)). Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNF: -96. 0%, FUTU: +873. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HKD and CNF and FUTU and QFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (HKD (Technology) and CNF (Financial Services) and FUTU (Financial Services) and QFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HKD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. QFIN pays a dividend while HKD, CNF, FUTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.