Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HNST vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs CENT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Household & Personal Products
Household & Personal Products
Packaged Foods
HNST vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs CENT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $420M | $595M | $1.89B | $1.83B | $2.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $352M | $1.79B | $7.19B | $2.79B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-899M | $-281M | $105M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | 45.7% | 34.0% | 36.6% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 6.0% | 6.4% | 4.1% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 35.3x | 7.5x | 7.9x | 14.8x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $78M | $5.65B | $654M | $1.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $19M | $203M | $124M | $882M |
HNST vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs CENT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Honest Company,… (HNST) | 100 | 23.6 | -76.4% |
| Helen of Troy Limit… (HELE) | 100 | 12.3 | -87.7% |
| Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) | 100 | 15.5 | -84.5% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 88.4 | -11.6% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HNST vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs CENT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HNST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.64, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 3.98x
- -1.9% revenue growth vs HELE's -6.4%
HELE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 13.5x)
NWL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.91, yield 6.4%
- 6.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SPB's 2.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
SPB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.15 vs CENT's 4.52
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.4%, current ratio 2.26x
- +30.1% vs HNST's -22.3%
CENT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -2.2%, EPS growth 57.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.1%
- 161.6% 10Y total return vs SPB's 11.9%
- 5.4% margin vs HELE's -50.3%
- Beta 0.65 vs NWL's 1.91, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs HELE's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 13.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs HELE's -50.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs NWL's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SPB's 2.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.1% vs HNST's -22.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs HELE's -37.8%, ROIC 9.1% vs 4.6% |
HNST vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs CENT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HNST vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs CENT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CENT leads in 3 of 6 categories
HELE leads 1 • HNST leads 1 • NWL leads 0 • SPB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CENT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 20.4x HNST's $352M. CENT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HELE's -50.3%. On growth, CENT holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $352M | $1.8B | $7.2B | $2.8B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $107M | $696M | $214M | $302M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$899M | -$281M | $105M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $171M | $19M | $303M | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | +45.7% | +34.0% | +36.6% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +6.0% | +6.4% | +4.1% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -50.3% | -3.9% | +3.8% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +9.6% | +0.3% | +10.9% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.7% | -3.3% | -1.1% | -3.3% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.3% | -2.1% | +9.9% | +48.8% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
HELE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 26% valuation discount to SPB's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPB offers better value at 1.57x vs CENT's 5.04x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $420M | $595M | $1.9B | $1.8B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $335M | $654M | $7.3B | $2.4B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.64x | -0.66x | -6.54x | 20.37x | 15.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.29x | 7.53x | 7.93x | 14.84x | 13.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.57x | 5.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.68x | 10.59x | 8.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 0.33x | 0.26x | 0.65x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.44x | 0.74x | 0.78x | 1.07x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.82x | 3.48x | 111.23x | 11.04x | 8.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CENT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CENT delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-95 for HELE. HNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWL's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs NWL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | -94.5% | -11.1% | +5.5% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.2% | -37.8% | -2.5% | +3.0% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.5% | +4.6% | +4.3% | +3.9% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.2% | +5.0% | +5.3% | +4.2% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.10x | 2.36x | 0.34x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$85M | $59M | $5.4B | $531M | $558M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $19M | $203M | $124M | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $78M | $5.7B | $654M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.04x | -5.02x | 0.01x | 3.33x | 1200.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HNST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPB five years ago would be worth $9,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,142 for HELE. Over the past 12 months, SPB leads with a +30.1% total return vs HNST's -22.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HNST at 32.6% vs HELE's -35.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.9% | +25.2% | +21.5% | +31.7% | +20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.3% | +5.4% | -5.4% | +30.1% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.1% | -73.2% | -47.8% | +14.2% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.5% | -88.6% | -75.5% | -7.8% | -17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.7% | -74.4% | -75.8% | +11.9% | +161.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.6% | -35.5% | -19.5% | +4.5% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CENT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CENT is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWL's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CENT currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs NWL's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.65x | 1.91x | 0.82x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.55 | $33.76 | $6.64 | $86.95 | $41.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.07 | $13.85 | $3.07 | $49.99 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.2% | +76.5% | +67.0% | +90.4% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 78.4 | 64.6 | 61.3 | 47.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 627K | 5.9M | 318K | 74K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWL and CENT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HNST as "Hold", HELE as "Hold", NWL as "Hold", SPB as "Buy", CENT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.4% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs -19.6% for HNST (target: $3). For income investors, NWL offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs SPB's 2.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $22.00 | $5.50 | $85.00 | $51.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 11 | 26 | 21 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.4% | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.29 | $1.86 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +17.8% | +6.5% |
CENT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HELE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HNST vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs CENT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Honest Company, Inc.
(HNST) is the stronger pick with -1. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT?
On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 15.
1x versus Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Helen of Troy Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus Central Garden & Pet Company's 4. 52x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT?
Over the past 5 years, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) delivered a total return of -7. 8%, compared to -88. 6% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CENT returned +161. 6% versus HNST's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Newell Brands Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NWL is approximately 194% more volatile than CENT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Newell Brands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Honest Company, Inc.
(HNST) is pulling ahead at -1. 9% versus -6. 4% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Central Garden & Pet Company grew EPS 57. 4% year-over-year, compared to -827. 7% for Helen of Troy Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, HNST leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT?
Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus -50. 3% for Helen of Troy Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CENT leads at 8. 5% versus -5. 0% for HNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HELE leads at 45. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus Central Garden & Pet Company's 4. 52x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for The Honest Company, Inc. — 27. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 32. 4% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT?
In this comparison, NWL (6.
4% yield), SPB (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HNST, HELE, CENT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HNST or HELE or NWL or SPB or CENT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 4% yield). Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPB: +11. 9%, HELE: -74. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HNST and HELE and NWL and SPB and CENT?
These companies operate in different sectors (HNST (Consumer Cyclical) and HELE (Consumer Defensive) and NWL (Consumer Defensive) and SPB (Consumer Defensive) and CENT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HNST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock. NWL, SPB pay a dividend while HNST, HELE, CENT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.