Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HOMB vs BOKF vs UMBF vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HOMB vs BOKF vs UMBF vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.26B | $10.38B | $9.98B | $4.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.45B | $3.36B | $4.44B | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $458M | $537M | $883M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 65.6% | 57.1% | 54.4% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 19.8% | 20.3% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 13.2x | 10.5x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.20B | $4.45B | $3.80B | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $910M | $1.43B | $953M | $763M |
HOMB vs BOKF vs UMBF vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 186.8 | +86.8% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
| UMB Financial Corpo… (UMBF) | 100 | 261.2 | +161.2% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOMB vs BOKF vs UMBF vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 0.16x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.16x
- NIM 3.8% vs BOKF's 2.4%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 171.3% 10Y total return vs UMBF's 168.6%
- +44.3% vs FFIN's -4.2%
UMBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.17 vs BOKF's 4.43
- 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's 9.5%
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 15.8x), PEG 1.17 vs 3.04
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 15.8x), PEG 1.17 vs 3.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs UMBF's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.3% vs FFIN's -4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% |
HOMB vs BOKF vs UMBF vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HOMB vs BOKF vs UMBF vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
UMBF leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • HOMB leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UMBF is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 6.0x FFIN's $739M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $3.4B | $4.4B | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $601M | $797M | $1.1B | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $458M | $537M | $883M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $354M | $1.5B | $985M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.6% | +57.1% | +54.4% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +19.8% | +20.3% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +15.6% | +15.8% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +42.6% | +22.0% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.0% | +1.8% | +176.9% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
UMBF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 36% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UMBF offers better value at 1.59x vs BOKF's 5.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $10.4B | $10.0B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $13.4B | $12.8B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.28x | 16.56x | 14.35x | 20.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.75x | 13.18x | 10.52x | 15.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.36x | 5.56x | 1.59x | 3.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.06x | 17.36x | 12.10x | 14.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.62x | 3.09x | 2.25x | 6.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 1.55x | 1.30x | 2.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.45x | 7.26x | 10.20x | 15.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs FFIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +8.9% | +11.7% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +4.1% | +7.5% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +5.5% | +14.4% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.80x | 0.49x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $292M | $3.0B | $2.8B | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $910M | $1.4B | $953M | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $4.5B | $3.8B | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.44x | 0.55x | 0.63x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $16,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,043 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.3% total return vs FFIN's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UMBF at 32.9% vs FFIN's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +14.1% | +12.9% | +8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.0% | +44.3% | +31.4% | -4.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.4% | +75.4% | +134.7% | +23.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | +62.8% | +42.6% | -29.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.2% | +171.3% | +168.6% | +145.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.4% | +20.6% | +32.9% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOMB and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UMBF's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.03x | 1.19x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.83 | $139.73 | $136.11 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.68 | $91.35 | $98.16 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.6% | +96.4% | +96.3% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 51.6 | 72.4 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 321K | 606K | 727K |
Analyst Outlook
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOMB as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", UMBF as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -2.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, HOMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.81% vs UMBF's 1.35%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $131.57 | $150.40 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 21 | 18 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +1.7% | +1.4% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 11 | 17 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | $2.24 | $1.77 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.9% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UMBF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HOMB vs BOKF vs UMBF vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the stronger pick with 68.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 5% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 7x. On forward P/E, UMB Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UMB Financial Corporation wins at 1. 17x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 43x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +62.
8%, compared to -29. 6% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +171. 3% versus HOMB's +58. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning UMBF is approximately 46% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is pulling ahead at 68.
5% versus 9. 5% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 17x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 43x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 8% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 4% for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF).
09Is HOMB or BOKF or UMBF or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 2%, UMBF: +169. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOMB and BOKF and UMBF and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UMBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.