HOOD vs AMTD vs SCHW vs FUTU

For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.

3x versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. at 37. 6x. On forward P/E, Futu Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Futu Holdings Limited wins at 0. 02x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 70x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) delivered a total return of +121. 2%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +956. 7% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately 4733% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Robinhood Markets, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.

4% net margin versus 22. 9% for The Charles Schwab Corporation — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus 29. 6% for SCHW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOOD leads at 83. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 70x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) trades at 1. 7x forward P/E versus 40. 9x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 39. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 52. 1% to $117. 14.

In this comparison, AMTD (36.

4% yield), SCHW (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. HOOD, FUTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

06), 36. 4% yield). Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMTD: -91. 4%, HOOD: +121. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SCHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock. AMTD, SCHW pay a dividend while HOOD, FUTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.