Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOOD vs SCHW vs IBKR vs RJF vs AMTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Asset Management
HOOD vs SCHW vs IBKR vs RJF vs AMTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $69.39B | $164.19B | $37.39B | $31.31B | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.47B | $26.00B | $10.23B | $15.91B | $54M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.90B | $8.85B | $984M | $2.15B | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 83.3% | 75.4% | 89.8% | 88.2% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 46.8% | 29.6% | 86.0% | 28.7% | 48.2% |
| Forward P/E | 40.9x | 15.3x | 33.7x | 13.4x | 0.3x |
| Total Debt | $15.41B | $45.13B | $19M | $4.54B | $283M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.26B | $42.08B | $4.96B | $11.39B | $63M |
HOOD vs SCHW vs IBKR vs RJF vs AMTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | 100 | 219.1 | +119.1% |
| The Charles Schwab … (SCHW) | 100 | 136.0 | +36.0% |
| Interactive Brokers… (IBKR) | 100 | 542.4 | +442.4% |
| Raymond James Finan… (RJF) | 100 | 184.0 | +84.0% |
| AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOOD vs SCHW vs IBKR vs RJF vs AMTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 31.4%
- PEG 0.16 vs SCHW's 6.70
- NIM 4.0% vs AMTD's 0.3%
- 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
SCHW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IBKR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 8.3% 10Y total return vs RJF's 403.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs RJF's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- +87.6% vs AMTD's +6.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs RJF's 0.6%
Among these 5 stocks, RJF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMTD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 36.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 10.62x
- Beta 0.06, yield 36.4%, current ratio 10.62x
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 13.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs RJF's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs HOOD's 3.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 36.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RJF's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.6% vs AMTD's +6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs RJF's 0.6% |
HOOD vs SCHW vs IBKR vs RJF vs AMTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HOOD vs SCHW vs IBKR vs RJF vs AMTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBKR leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMTD leads 1 • HOOD leads 0 • SCHW leads 0 • RJF leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBKR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCHW is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.0B annually — 480.9x AMTD's $54M. AMTD is the more profitable business, keeping 94.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IBKR's 9.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.5B | $26.0B | $10.2B | $15.9B | $54M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $12.8B | $8.9B | $2.9B | $263M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $8.9B | $984M | $2.1B | $188M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $9.7B | $15.7B | $1.5B | $45M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.3% | +75.4% | +89.8% | +88.2% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +46.8% | +29.6% | +86.0% | +28.7% | +48.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +42.1% | +22.9% | +9.6% | +13.4% | +94.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +7.9% | +153.9% | +14.1% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +41.5% | +26.0% | +15.3% | -88.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AMTD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to IBKR's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOOD offers better value at 0.14x vs SCHW's 13.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $69.4B | $164.2B | $37.4B | $31.3B | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80.5B | $167.2B | $32.4B | $24.5B | $228M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.58x | 30.90x | 37.80x | 15.42x | 0.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.87x | 15.34x | 33.67x | 13.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.14x | 13.50x | 1.27x | 0.72x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 36.94x | 18.32x | 3.65x | 5.14x | 6.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.51x | 6.32x | 3.65x | 1.97x | 0.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.73x | 3.50x | 1.84x | 2.63x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.75x | 80.09x | 2.38x | 13.94x | 1.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SCHW and IBKR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCHW delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $5 for IBKR. IBKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOOD's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCHW scores 7/9 vs AMTD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.4% | +2.9% | +5.2% | +16.4% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +2.3% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +10.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +6.0% | +24.7% | +20.9% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.0% | +9.5% | +22.2% | +22.0% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.93x | 0.00x | 0.36x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.1B | $3.1B | -$4.9B | -$6.8B | $221M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.3B | $42.1B | $5.0B | $11.4B | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.4B | $45.1B | $19M | $4.5B | $283M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 97.05x | 3.05x | 2.13x | 1.57x | 17.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBKR five years ago would be worth $48,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $260 for AMTD. Over the past 12 months, IBKR leads with a +87.6% total return vs AMTD's +6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 105.7% vs AMTD's -40.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.1% | -8.7% | +24.9% | -2.2% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.3% | +12.2% | +87.6% | +13.2% | +6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +770.4% | +94.0% | +341.9% | +90.9% | -78.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.2% | +36.9% | +384.2% | +86.0% | -97.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.2% | +262.2% | +828.0% | +403.7% | -91.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +105.7% | +24.7% | +64.1% | +24.1% | -40.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBKR and AMTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMTD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOOD's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBKR currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs HOOD's 50.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.05x | 0.72x | 1.93x | 1.05x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $153.86 | $107.50 | $84.63 | $177.66 | $1.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $45.56 | $82.04 | $43.78 | $138.82 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.1% | +86.0% | +99.2% | +89.4% | +64.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 45.4 | 66.7 | 60.7 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29.6M | 9.4M | 4.5M | 1.3M | 25K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RJF and AMTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOOD as "Buy", SCHW as "Buy", IBKR as "Buy", RJF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.1% upside for HOOD (target: $117) vs 4.5% for IBKR (target: $88). For income investors, AMTD offers the higher dividend yield at 36.35% vs IBKR's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $117.14 | $119.11 | $87.67 | $169.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 50 | 19 | 24 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +0.4% | +1.3% | +36.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 3 | 22 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.24 | $0.30 | $2.01 | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
IBKR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AMTD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HOOD vs SCHW vs IBKR vs RJF vs AMTD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD?
On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Raymond James Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Robinhood Markets, Inc. wins at 0. 16x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 70x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD?
Over the past 5 years, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
(IBKR) delivered a total return of +384. 2%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBKR returned +828. 0% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately 4733% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 168% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Robinhood Markets, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD?
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.
4% net margin versus 9. 6% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus 28. 7% for RJF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBKR leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 70x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 40. 9x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 27. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 52. 1% to $117. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD?
In this comparison, AMTD (36.
4% yield), SCHW (1. 3% yield), RJF (1. 3% yield), IBKR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HOOD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOOD or SCHW or IBKR or RJF or AMTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 36. 4% yield). Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMTD: -91. 4%, HOOD: +121. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOOD and SCHW and IBKR and RJF and AMTD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SCHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RJF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock. SCHW, RJF, AMTD pay a dividend while HOOD, IBKR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.