Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOPE vs HAFC vs BYFC vs CARV vs PFBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HOPE vs HAFC vs BYFC vs CARV vs PFBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.60B | $908M | $92M | $9M | $1.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $968M | $445M | $63M | $37M | $499M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $76M | $-25M | $-13M | $134M |
| Gross Margin | 48.6% | 57.5% | 51.9% | 56.3% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 24.3% | -38.8% | -36.8% | 38.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 9.6x | — | — | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $396M | $280M | $153M | $29M | $384M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $560M | $213M | $11M | $50M | $807M |
HOPE vs HAFC vs BYFC vs CARV vs PFBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| Broadway Financial … (BYFC) | 100 | 85.4 | -14.6% |
| Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.2% |
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 252.1 | +152.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOPE vs HAFC vs BYFC vs CARV vs PFBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs HAFC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HAFC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 3.6%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 22.4%
- Beta 0.92, yield 3.6%, current ratio 49.21x
- 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs CARV's -8.3%
BYFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.02 vs HOPE's 1.10
- +52.8% vs CARV's +18.4%
Among these 5 stocks, CARV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PFBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 256.1% 10Y total return vs HAFC's 76.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
- PEG 0.51 vs HAFC's 0.76
- NIM 3.6% vs BYFC's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs CARV's -8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CARV's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs HOPE's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs HAFC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs CARV's +18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CARV's 0.9% |
HOPE vs HAFC vs BYFC vs CARV vs PFBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HOPE vs HAFC vs BYFC vs CARV vs PFBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
HAFC leads 1 • BYFC leads 1 • HOPE leads 0 • CARV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HAFC and PFBC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $968M annually — 25.9x CARV's $37M. PFBC is the more profitable business, keeping 26.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYFC's -39.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $968M | $445M | $63M | $37M | $499M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $84M | $110M | -$24M | -$10M | $191M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $76M | -$25M | -$13M | $134M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $147M | $204M | -$13,000 | -$9M | $167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.6% | +57.5% | +51.9% | +56.3% | +55.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +24.3% | -38.8% | -36.8% | +38.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +17.1% | -39.3% | -36.8% | +26.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +45.8% | -0.0% | -34.6% | +33.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.0% | +20.7% | -46.8% | -12.2% | +24.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PFBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 67% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.52x vs HAFC's 0.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $908M | $92M | $9M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $976M | $234M | -$12M | $730M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.22x | 12.10x | -3.05x | -0.63x | 9.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.70x | 9.61x | — | — | 8.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.95x | — | — | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.18x | 8.59x | — | — | 3.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.66x | 2.04x | 1.45x | 0.24x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 1.15x | 0.32x | 0.29x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.58x | 4.46x | — | — | 6.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CARV. HOPE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARV's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs CARV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.6% | +9.8% | -9.1% | -48.4% | +17.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +1.0% | -1.9% | -1.9% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +7.4% | -3.7% | -13.0% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +2.5% | -5.6% | -15.4% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.35x | 0.58x | 0.98x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$164M | $68M | $142M | -$21M | -$423M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $560M | $213M | $11M | $50M | $807M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $396M | $280M | $153M | $29M | $384M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.17x | 0.62x | -0.87x | -0.71x | 0.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAFC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $16,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,074 for CARV. Over the past 12 months, BYFC leads with a +52.8% total return vs CARV's +18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs CARV's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +15.2% | +29.3% | +19.3% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.4% | +36.9% | +52.8% | +18.4% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.7% | +137.2% | +30.9% | -61.3% | +126.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.0% | +64.7% | -33.2% | -79.3% | +56.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | +76.5% | -37.6% | -53.6% | +256.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.8% | +33.4% | +9.4% | -27.2% | +31.3% |
Risk & Volatility
BYFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYFC currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CARV's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.92x | 0.02x | 0.08x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.02 | $31.27 | $9.86 | $3.85 | $103.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.44 | $21.84 | $5.60 | $1.07 | $79.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +97.2% | +99.8% | +43.4% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 64.1 | 75.4 | 50.2 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 902K | 265K | 4K | 4K | 102K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOPE and HAFC and PFBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOPE as "Hold", HAFC as "Hold", PFBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for HOPE (target: $15) vs 7.7% for PFBC (target: $102). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs PFBC's 3.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $35.00 | — | — | $102.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 11 | — | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +3.6% | +3.5% | — | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | $1.09 | $0.35 | — | $2.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.1% |
PFBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HAFC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
HOPE vs HAFC vs BYFC vs CARV vs PFBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preferred Bank (PFBC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC?
On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.
1x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Preferred Bank wins at 0. 51x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC?
Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +64.
7%, compared to -79. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFBC returned +256. 1% versus CARV's -53. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HOPE is approximately 4308% more volatile than BYFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 98% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to -81. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC?
Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
8% net margin versus -39. 3% for Broadway Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFBC leads at 38. 0% versus -38. 8% for BYFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAFC leads at 57. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOPE: 15. 8% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC?
In this comparison, HOPE (4.
4% yield), HAFC (3. 6% yield), BYFC (3. 5% yield), PFBC (3. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CARV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOPE or HAFC or BYFC or CARV or PFBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYFC: -37. 6%, HOPE: +18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOPE and HAFC and BYFC and CARV and PFBC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BYFC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CARV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock. HOPE, HAFC, BYFC, PFBC pay a dividend while CARV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.