Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOUS vs RMR vs AMG vs DOUG vs COMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Asset Management
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
HOUS vs RMR vs AMG vs DOUG vs COMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Asset Management | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.98B | $618M | $7.95B | $183M | $5.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.87B | $640M | $2.45B | $1.03B | $8.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-128M | $23M | $717M | $15M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 47.3% | 93.1% | 86.0% | 16.8% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 9.4% | 31.8% | -5.9% | -4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.4x | 9.0x | 20.7x | 53.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.06B | $204M | $2.69B | $103M | $454M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $118M | $62M | $586M | $120M | $199M |
HOUS vs RMR vs AMG vs DOUG vs COMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anywhere Real Estat… (HOUS) | 100 | 104.9 | +4.9% |
| The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) | 100 | 43.0 | -57.0% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 175.2 | +75.2% |
| Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) | 100 | 21.6 | -78.4% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 116.3 | +16.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOUS vs RMR vs AMG vs DOUG vs COMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +375.5% vs DOUG's +13.7%
RMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 9.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 50.8%, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.65, yield 9.4%, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.65 vs HOUS's 1.86, lower leverage
AMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 86.2% 10Y total return vs RMR's 57.5%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 53.5x)
- 29.3% margin vs HOUS's -2.2%
- 8.0% ROA vs HOUS's -2.2%, ROIC 8.1% vs 1.0%
Among these 5 stocks, DOUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 53.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs HOUS's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs HOUS's 1.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.4% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HOUS's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +375.5% vs DOUG's +13.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs HOUS's -2.2%, ROIC 8.1% vs 1.0% |
HOUS vs RMR vs AMG vs DOUG vs COMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HOUS vs RMR vs AMG vs DOUG vs COMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMG leads in 3 of 6 categories
RMR leads 1 • HOUS leads 0 • DOUG leads 0 • COMP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 13.0x RMR's $640M. AMG is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOUS's -2.2%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $640M | $2.4B | $1.0B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $76M | $855M | -$52M | -$100M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$128M | $23M | $717M | $15M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $92M | $978M | -$17M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | +93.1% | +86.0% | +16.8% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +9.4% | +31.8% | -5.9% | -4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +3.6% | +29.3% | +1.5% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +14.4% | +41.1% | -1.7% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | -12.6% | — | +0.9% | +99.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | -76.2% | +149.1% | +10.7% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, DOUG trades at a 35% valuation discount to RMR's 18.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMG's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 66.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $618M | $7.9B | $183M | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $759M | $10.1B | $165M | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.34x | 18.82x | 13.09x | 12.18x | -87.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.37x | 8.98x | 20.70x | 53.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.77x | 14.24x | 10.61x | — | 66.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 0.88x | 3.25x | 0.18x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 0.80x | 2.22x | 1.01x | 6.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 76.08x | 8.57x | 7.91x | — | 26.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMG delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-8 for HOUS. RMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOUS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs HOUS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.4% | +5.6% | +16.0% | +10.3% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +3.4% | +8.0% | +3.2% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +6.7% | +8.1% | -26.1% | -2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +7.2% | +8.6% | -16.3% | -2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.95x | 0.51x | 0.61x | 0.56x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $142M | $2.1B | -$17M | $255M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $118M | $62M | $586M | $120M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $204M | $2.7B | $103M | $454M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.42x | 14.63x | 9.69x | 4.53x | -0.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AMG and COMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMG five years ago would be worth $17,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,998 for DOUG. Over the past 12 months, HOUS leads with a +375.5% total return vs DOUG's +13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 49.1% vs DOUG's -8.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.4% | +34.0% | +3.1% | -9.2% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +375.5% | +52.5% | +70.0% | +13.7% | +14.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +227.9% | +10.8% | +109.8% | -23.3% | +231.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.7% | -13.5% | +71.7% | -80.0% | -48.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.9% | +57.5% | +86.2% | -80.0% | -56.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.6% | +3.5% | +28.0% | -8.5% | +49.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOUS and RMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOUS's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOUS currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs COMP's 62.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 0.65x | 1.14x | 1.82x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.03 | $19.91 | $334.78 | $3.20 | $13.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.10 | $13.48 | $172.54 | $1.53 | $5.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +97.3% | +88.9% | +64.7% | +62.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.6 | 78.0 | 61.3 | 62.1 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.5M | 155K | 345K | 734K | 14.5M |
Analyst Outlook
RMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOUS as "Hold", RMR as "Hold", AMG as "Buy", DOUG as "Buy", COMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.1% upside for RMR (target: $32) vs 7.7% for HOUS (target: $19). For income investors, RMR offers the higher dividend yield at 9.41% vs HOUS's 0.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $32.00 | $331.50 | — | $14.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 14 | 12 | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +9.4% | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $1.82 | $0.03 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.1% | +8.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RMR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
HOUS vs RMR vs AMG vs DOUG vs COMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP?
On trailing P/E, Douglas Elliman Inc.
(DOUG) is the cheapest at 12. 2x versus The RMR Group Inc. at 18. 8x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP?
Over the past 5 years, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) delivered a total return of +71. 7%, compared to -80. 0% for Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMG returned +86. 2% versus DOUG's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Anywhere Real Estate Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning HOUS is approximately 188% more volatile than RMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Douglas Elliman Inc. grew EPS 118. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 7% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COMP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -2. 2% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMG leads at 31. 8% versus -5. 9% for DOUG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMG leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 44. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMR: 65. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP?
In this comparison, RMR (9.
4% yield), HOUS (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AMG, DOUG, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOUS or RMR or AMG or DOUG or COMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 9. 4% yield). Anywhere Real Estate Inc. (HOUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMR: +57. 5%, HOUS: -33. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOUS and RMR and AMG and DOUG and COMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (HOUS (Real Estate) and RMR (Real Estate) and AMG (Financial Services) and DOUG (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RMR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOUG is a small-cap deep-value stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. RMR pays a dividend while HOUS, AMG, DOUG, COMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.