Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HRMY vs JAZZ vs AVPT vs AXSM vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Software - Infrastructure
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
HRMY vs JAZZ vs AVPT vs AXSM vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Software - Infrastructure | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.82B | $14.24B | $2.23B | $11.33B | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $899M | $4.44B | $444M | $708M | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $146M | $29M | $47M | $-188M | $504M |
| Gross Margin | 76.5% | 66.9% | 73.7% | 92.6% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 21.1% | 13.9% | 9.6% | -24.8% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 9.4x | 27.7x | — | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $240M | $5.42B | $10M | $241M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $753M | $1.39B | $481M | $323M | $551M |
HRMY vs JAZZ vs AVPT vs AXSM vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harmony Biosciences… (HRMY) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
| Jazz Pharmaceutical… (JAZZ) | 100 | 168.9 | +68.9% |
| AvePoint, Inc. (AVPT) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
| Axsome Therapeutics… (AXSM) | 100 | 300.2 | +200.2% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 194.7 | +94.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HRMY vs JAZZ vs AVPT vs AXSM vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HRMY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 11.9x)
JAZZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +123.7% vs AVPT's -40.0%
Among these 5 stocks, AVPT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AXSM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 38.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 133.7%
- 18.9% 10Y total return vs INVA's 94.9%
- 65.5% revenue growth vs JAZZ's 4.9%
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
- 118.9% margin vs AXSM's -26.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs JAZZ's 4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs AXSM's -26.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs AVPT's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.7% vs AVPT's -40.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs AXSM's -27.8%, ROIC 14.2% vs -19.1% |
HRMY vs JAZZ vs AVPT vs AXSM vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HRMY vs JAZZ vs AVPT vs AXSM vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 1 of 6 categories
HRMY leads 1 • AVPT leads 1 • AXSM leads 1 • JAZZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAZZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 10.5x INVA's $424M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXSM's -26.6%. On growth, AXSM holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $899M | $4.4B | $444M | $708M | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $209M | $994M | $47M | -$167M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $146M | $29M | $47M | -$188M | $504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $342M | $1.2B | $105M | -$71M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.5% | +66.9% | +73.7% | +92.6% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +13.9% | +9.6% | -24.8% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +0.7% | +10.5% | -26.6% | +118.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +28.1% | +23.6% | -10.0% | +42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.6% | +19.1% | +26.0% | +57.4% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.5% | +3.9% | +3.6% | -3.3% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HRMY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 90% valuation discount to AVPT's 68.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HRMY's 5.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVPT's 44.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $14.2B | $2.2B | $11.3B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $18.3B | $1.8B | $11.2B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.59x | -38.86x | 68.80x | -59.81x | 6.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.95x | 9.38x | 27.75x | — | 11.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.58x | 23.84x | 44.79x | — | 8.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.09x | 3.34x | 5.31x | 17.74x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 3.21x | 4.94x | 124.01x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.23x | 10.98x | 27.32x | — | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVPT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AXSM. AVPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXSM's 2.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVPT scores 6/9 vs AXSM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.2% | +0.7% | +10.2% | -2.6% | +46.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.0% | +0.3% | +6.3% | -27.8% | +32.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +42.0% | +2.1% | +11.4% | -19.1% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.6% | +2.2% | +8.1% | -52.1% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 1.26x | 0.02x | 2.73x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$513M | $4.0B | -$471M | -$82M | -$282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $753M | $1.4B | $481M | $323M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $240M | $5.4B | $10M | $241M | $269M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 21.78x | -3.72x | — | -34.13x | 63.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXSM five years ago would be worth $38,641 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,168 for AVPT. Over the past 12 months, JAZZ leads with a +123.7% total return vs AVPT's -40.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXSM at 41.5% vs HRMY's -4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.9% | +31.1% | -21.9% | +23.2% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.0% | +123.7% | -40.0% | +98.5% | +21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.8% | +63.7% | +133.0% | +183.2% | +95.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.3% | +30.0% | +1.7% | +286.4% | +94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | +53.7% | +5.5% | +1886.5% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.5% | +17.8% | +32.6% | +41.5% | +25.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JAZZ and INVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVPT's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JAZZ currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs AVPT's 51.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.65x | 1.06x | 0.69x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.87 | $230.40 | $20.25 | $233.75 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.52 | $97.50 | $8.83 | $96.09 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.9% | +98.5% | +51.0% | +94.2% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 77.0 | 54.1 | 78.8 | 39.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 791K | 866K | 1.6M | 667K | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRMY as "Buy", JAZZ as "Buy", AVPT as "Buy", AXSM as "Buy", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.6% upside for AVPT (target: $18) vs -4.8% for JAZZ (target: $216).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.80 | $216.14 | $17.50 | $225.86 | $37.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 48 | 12 | 25 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +2.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
INVA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HRMY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HRMY vs JAZZ vs AVPT vs AXSM vs INVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger pick with 65. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. (HRMY) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus AvePoint, Inc. at 68. 8x. On forward P/E, Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) delivered a total return of +286. 4%, compared to +1. 7% for AvePoint, Inc. (AVPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXSM returned +1886% versus HRMY's -15. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus AvePoint, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning AVPT is approximately 743% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AvePoint, Inc. (AVPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is pulling ahead at 65. 5% versus 4. 9% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -167. 5% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXSM leads at 133. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -28. 7% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -26. 5% for AXSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXSM leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
(HRMY) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for AvePoint, Inc. — 18. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVPT: 69. 6% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HRMY or JAZZ or AVPT or AXSM or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), +1886% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXSM: +1886%, AVPT: +5. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HRMY and JAZZ and AVPT and AXSM and INVA?
These companies operate in different sectors (HRMY (Healthcare) and JAZZ (Healthcare) and AVPT (Technology) and AXSM (Healthcare) and INVA (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HRMY is a small-cap high-growth stock; JAZZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AVPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; AXSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.