Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HSII vs MWA vs KFRC vs RGP vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Staffing & Employment Services
Consulting Services
Staffing & Employment Services
HSII vs MWA vs KFRC vs RGP vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Industrial - Machinery | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $4.21B | $790M | $167M | $349M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $1.46B | $1.33B | $507M | $3.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $207M | $35M | $-132M | $-266M |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 37.6% | 27.2% | 38.0% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 19.4% | 3.8% | -25.5% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 18.6x | 18.0x | — | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $101M | $452M | $70M | $25M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $516M | $432M | $2M | $86M | $33M |
HSII vs MWA vs KFRC vs RGP vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heidrick & Struggle… (HSII) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 259.5 | +159.5% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 97.4 | -2.6% |
| Resources Connectio… (RGP) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 57.6 | -42.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSII vs MWA vs KFRC vs RGP vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HSII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 240.0% 10Y total return vs MWA's 179.4%
- +46.2% vs RGP's -12.4%
MWA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 64.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 8.7% revenue growth vs RGP's -12.9%
- 14.2% margin vs RGP's -26.1%
- 11.4% ROA vs RGP's -45.8%, ROIC 19.7% vs -62.9%
KFRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs RGP's 1.17
RGP is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 12.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MWA's 1.0%
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs RGP's -12.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.2% margin vs RGP's -26.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs RGP's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 12.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MWA's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs RGP's -12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs RGP's -45.8%, ROIC 19.7% vs -62.9% |
HSII vs MWA vs KFRC vs RGP vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HSII vs MWA vs KFRC vs RGP vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MWA leads in 2 of 6 categories
KELYA leads 1 • HSII leads 1 • KFRC leads 0 • RGP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MWA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 6.1x RGP's $507M. MWA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RGP's -26.1%. On growth, HSII holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $507M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | $333M | $56M | -$119M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $207M | $35M | -$132M | -$266M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $171M | $43M | $24M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +37.6% | +27.2% | +38.0% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +19.4% | +3.8% | -25.5% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +14.2% | +2.6% | -26.1% | -8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +11.7% | +3.3% | +4.7% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | +5.5% | +0.1% | -19.2% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.9% | +15.2% | +2.2% | +81.7% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.0x trailing earnings, MWA trades at a 85% valuation discount to HSII's 143.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MWA's 14.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HSII's 30.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $4.2B | $790M | $167M | $349M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $812M | $4.2B | $858M | $106M | $475M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 143.93x | 22.04x | 22.05x | -0.77x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.72x | 18.65x | 17.96x | — | 10.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.00x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.78x | 14.07x | 15.42x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 2.94x | 0.59x | 0.30x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.76x | 4.31x | 6.17x | 0.71x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.88x | 24.45x | 16.88x | 10.32x | 3.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MWA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-68 for RGP. RGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFRC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs RGP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +20.7% | +27.2% | -68.1% | -24.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +11.4% | +9.2% | -45.8% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +19.7% | +19.1% | -62.9% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +17.8% | +20.1% | -58.9% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.46x | 0.56x | 0.12x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$415M | $20M | $68M | -$61M | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $516M | $432M | $2M | $86M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $101M | $452M | $70M | $25M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 22.98x | — | -300.18x | -12.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MWA five years ago would be worth $18,911 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,168 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, HSII leads with a +46.2% total return vs RGP's -12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HSII at 34.9% vs RGP's -26.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +12.6% | +39.2% | -10.3% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.2% | +14.9% | +18.9% | -12.4% | -12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.7% | +88.7% | -13.8% | -59.5% | -34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +89.1% | -16.8% | -53.4% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.0% | +179.4% | +195.5% | -36.4% | -33.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.9% | +23.6% | -4.8% | -26.0% | -13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSII and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RGP's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSII currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 64.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.02x | 0.53x | 1.17x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.05 | $31.00 | $47.48 | $6.30 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.84 | $22.74 | $24.49 | $3.06 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +86.7% | +91.0% | +70.8% | +64.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.9 | 41.2 | 65.6 | 65.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.0M | 305K | 315K | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MWA and RGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HSII as "Hold", MWA as "Hold", KFRC as "Hold", RGP as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 191.5% upside for RGP (target: $13) vs -0.0% for HSII (target: $59). For income investors, RGP offers the higher dividend yield at 12.64% vs MWA's 0.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.00 | $33.33 | $71.00 | $13.00 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 21 | 10 | 18 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.0% | +3.6% | +12.6% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $0.27 | $1.55 | $0.56 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% | +6.4% | +7.8% | +3.5% |
MWA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HSII vs MWA vs KFRC vs RGP vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) is the stronger pick with 8. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (18. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA?
On trailing P/E, Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) is the cheapest at 22. 0x versus Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. at 143. 9x. On forward P/E, Kelly Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) delivered a total return of +89. 1%, compared to -58. 3% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSII returned +240. 0% versus RGP's -36. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Resources Connection, Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning RGP is approximately 121% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 56% for Kforce Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) is pulling ahead at 8. 7% versus -12. 9% for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mueller Water Products, Inc. grew EPS 64. 9% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MWA leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA?
Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 4% net margin versus -34. 8% for Resources Connection, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MWA leads at 18. 2% versus -35. 7% for RGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RGP leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Mueller Water Products, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RGP: 191. 5% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) offers the highest yield at 12. 6%, versus 1. 0% for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA).
09Is HSII or MWA or KFRC or RGP or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, RGP: -36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HSII and MWA and KFRC and RGP and KELYA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HSII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MWA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RGP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.