Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HSII vs MWA vs NWN vs AWK vs FELE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Regulated Gas
Regulated Water
Industrial - Machinery
HSII vs MWA vs NWN vs AWK vs FELE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Industrial - Machinery | Regulated Gas | Regulated Water | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $4.12B | $2.12B | $24.42B | $4.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $1.46B | $1.29B | $5.21B | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $207M | $123M | $1.10B | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 37.6% | 42.3% | 43.6% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 19.4% | 31.3% | 36.5% | 12.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 17.9x | 16.5x | 20.5x | 21.6x |
| Total Debt | $101M | $452M | $2.76B | $15.92B | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $516M | $432M | $41M | $119M | $100M |
HSII vs MWA vs NWN vs AWK vs FELE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heidrick & Struggle… (HSII) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 259.5 | +159.5% |
| Northwest Natural H… (NWN) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 187.6 | +87.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSII vs MWA vs NWN vs AWK vs FELE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HSII has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 240.0% 10Y total return vs MWA's 174.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.77, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.77 vs MWA's 0.94, lower leverage
MWA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.81 vs NWN's 4.58
- Lower P/E (17.9x vs 21.6x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.48
- 11.4% ROA vs NWN's 2.0%, ROIC 19.7% vs 8.1%
NWN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 36.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 11.8% revenue growth vs FELE's 5.4%
- 3.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%
AWK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 21.2% margin vs HSII's 3.1%
FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs FELE's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.9x vs 21.6x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.2% margin vs HSII's 3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs MWA's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.9% vs AWK's -11.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs NWN's 2.0%, ROIC 19.7% vs 8.1% |
HSII vs MWA vs NWN vs AWK vs FELE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HSII vs MWA vs NWN vs AWK vs FELE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWK leads in 1 of 6 categories
NWN leads 1 • MWA leads 1 • HSII leads 1 • FELE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 4.3x HSII's $1.2B. AWK is the more profitable business, keeping 21.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HSII's 3.1%. On growth, HSII holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $5.2B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | $333M | $609M | $2.8B | $322M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $207M | $123M | $1.1B | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $171M | -$333M | -$1.2B | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +37.6% | +42.3% | +43.6% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +19.4% | +31.3% | +36.5% | +12.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +14.2% | +9.6% | +21.2% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +11.7% | -25.9% | -23.1% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | +5.5% | -0.8% | +5.7% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.9% | +15.2% | +9.2% | -3.8% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NWN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.2x trailing earnings, NWN trades at a 87% valuation discount to HSII's 143.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MWA offers better value at 0.98x vs NWN's 5.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $4.1B | $2.1B | $24.4B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $812M | $4.1B | $4.8B | $40.2B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 143.93x | 21.61x | 18.21x | 21.94x | 30.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.72x | 17.89x | 16.54x | 20.52x | 21.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.98x | 5.05x | 2.78x | 3.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.78x | 13.80x | 7.95x | 14.50x | 13.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 2.88x | 1.65x | 4.75x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.76x | 4.23x | 1.40x | 2.25x | 3.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.88x | 23.98x | — | — | 22.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MWA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MWA delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $7 for HSII. FELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWN's 1.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs FELE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +20.7% | +8.3% | +10.1% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +11.4% | +2.0% | +3.1% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +19.7% | +8.1% | +5.5% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +17.8% | +8.1% | +6.1% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.46x | 1.87x | 1.47x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$415M | $20M | $2.7B | $15.8B | $181M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $516M | $432M | $41M | $119M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $101M | $452M | $2.8B | $15.9B | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 22.98x | 2.39x | 3.06x | 24.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MWA five years ago would be worth $18,663 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,928 for AWK. Over the past 12 months, HSII leads with a +39.9% total return vs AWK's -11.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HSII at 34.9% vs AWK's -3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +10.4% | +10.0% | -3.4% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | +7.7% | +20.3% | -11.7% | +14.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.7% | +85.1% | +20.4% | -9.0% | +9.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.4% | +86.6% | +8.9% | -10.7% | +21.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.0% | +174.4% | +22.7% | +99.3% | +229.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.9% | +22.8% | +6.4% | -3.1% | +3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSII and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MWA's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSII currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs AWK's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.94x | -0.12x | -0.48x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.05 | $31.00 | $55.99 | $148.33 | $111.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.10 | $22.74 | $39.10 | $121.28 | $83.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +85.1% | +90.1% | +84.3% | +89.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.9 | 39.2 | 34.9 | 35.6 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.0M | 254K | 1.7M | 275K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWN and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HSII as "Hold", MWA as "Hold", NWN as "Hold", AWK as "Hold", FELE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.3% upside for MWA (target: $32) vs -0.0% for HSII (target: $59). For income investors, NWN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.74% vs MWA's 1.01%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.00 | $32.25 | $57.00 | $130.67 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.0% | +3.7% | +2.6% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $0.27 | $1.89 | $3.25 | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
AWK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NWN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HSII vs MWA vs NWN vs AWK vs FELE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is the stronger pick with 11.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE). Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE?
On trailing P/E, Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is the cheapest at 18.
2x versus Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. at 143. 9x. On forward P/E, Northwest Natural Holding Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Water Products, Inc. wins at 0. 81x versus Northwest Natural Holding Company's 4. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) delivered a total return of +86. 6%, compared to -10. 7% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSII returned +240. 0% versus NWN's +22. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus Mueller Water Products, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning MWA is approximately -297% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 187% for Northwest Natural Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is pulling ahead at 11.
8% versus 5. 4% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mueller Water Products, Inc. grew EPS 64. 9% year-over-year, compared to -84. 4% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWK leads at 10. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE?
American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 0. 8% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 0. 7% for HSII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWK leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Northwest Natural Holding Company's 4. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 6x for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MWA: 22. 3% to $32. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 0% for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA).
09Is HSII or MWA or NWN or AWK or FELE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +99. 3%, MWA: +174. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HSII and MWA and NWN and AWK and FELE?
These companies operate in different sectors (HSII (Industrials) and MWA (Industrials) and NWN (Utilities) and AWK (Utilities) and FELE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HSII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MWA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.