Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HTLM vs LOVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
HTLM vs LOVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $148M | $230M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $235M | $690M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 27.7% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $84M |
HTLM vs LOVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 54.1 | -45.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTLM vs LOVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTLM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.21
- Rev growth 91.6%, EPS growth 227.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 264.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 64.2%, current ratio 1.19x
LOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -34.2% 10Y total return vs HTLM's -57.3%
- -23.9% vs HTLM's -52.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.6% revenue growth vs LOVE's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 25.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.4% margin vs LOVE's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs LOVE's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -23.9% vs HTLM's -52.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs LOVE's 2.6%, ROIC 123.8% vs 3.3% |
HTLM vs LOVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HTLM vs LOVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HTLM and LOVE each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOVE is the larger business by revenue, generating $690M annually — 2.9x HTLM's $235M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.4% (HTLM) to 1.9% (LOVE).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $235M | $690M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +57.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LOVE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, HTLM trades at a 48% valuation discount to LOVE's 22.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HTLM's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LOVE's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $148M | $230M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $141M | $330M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.79x | 22.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.42x | 11.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.84x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.66x | 13.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTLM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTLM delivers a 80.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $7 for LOVE. HTLM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +80.4% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.4% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +123.8% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +92.6% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.25x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOVE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTLM five years ago would be worth $4,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,300 for LOVE. Over the past 12 months, LOVE leads with a -23.9% total return vs HTLM's -52.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOVE at -15.4% vs HTLM's -24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.1% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.9% | -23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | -39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | -77.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | -34.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.7% | -15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTLM and LOVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTLM is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOVE's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOVE currently trades 72.1% from its 52-week high vs HTLM's 39.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $21.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.56 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.4% | +72.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.7 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 299K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.7% |
LOVE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HTLM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
HTLM vs LOVE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTLM or LOVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the stronger pick with 91.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTLM or LOVE?
On trailing P/E, HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the cheapest at 11.
8x versus The Lovesac Company at 22. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTLM or LOVE?
Over the past 5 years, HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) delivered a total return of -57.
3%, compared to -77. 0% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOVE returned -34. 2% versus HTLM's -57. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTLM or LOVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus The Lovesac Company's 1. 33β — meaning LOVE is approximately 540% more volatile than HTLM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTLM or LOVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is pulling ahead at 91.
6% versus -2. 8% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HomesToLife Ltd grew EPS 227. 3% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for The Lovesac Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, HTLM leads at 264. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTLM or LOVE?
HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
4% net margin versus 1. 7% for The Lovesac Company — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HTLM leads at 5. 1% versus 2. 0% for LOVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOVE leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HTLM or LOVE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is HTLM or LOVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTLM: -57. 3%, LOVE: -34. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HTLM and LOVE?
These companies operate in different sectors (HTLM (Industrials) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HTLM is a small-cap high-growth stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.