Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HYPD vs HOOD vs COIN vs SOFI vs SCHW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Capital Markets
HYPD vs HOOD vs COIN vs SOFI vs SCHW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $3M | $68.72B | $50.96B | $20.40B | $159.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $345K | $4.47B | $7.18B | $4.77B | $26.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $1.90B | $801M | $481M | $8.85B |
| Gross Margin | -8.2% | 83.3% | 74.6% | 75.1% | 75.4% |
| Operating Margin | -97.0% | 46.8% | 20.0% | 11.0% | 29.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.5x | 66.1x | 26.5x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $15.41B | $7.83B | $1.82B | $45.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $4.26B | $11.29B | $4.93B | $42.08B |
HYPD vs HOOD vs COIN vs SOFI vs SCHW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperion DeFi, Inc. (HYPD) | 100 | 34.4 | -65.6% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | 100 | 81.5 | -18.5% |
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 55.1 | -44.9% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
| The Charles Schwab … (SCHW) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HYPD vs HOOD vs COIN vs SOFI vs SCHW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HYPD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 14.1% revenue growth vs SCHW's 1.9%
HOOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 31.4%
- PEG 0.16 vs SCHW's 6.49
- Better valuation composite
- 42.1% margin vs HYPD's -73.9%
COIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.54
- NIM 4.4% vs SCHW's 1.9%
SCHW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 255.2% 10Y total return vs HOOD's 119.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 93.3%, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 0.72, yield 1.4%, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 0.72 vs HYPD's 3.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs SCHW's 1.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 42.1% margin vs HYPD's -73.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs HYPD's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.6% vs HYPD's -54.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 232.8% ROA vs HYPD's -68.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -11.7% |
HYPD vs HOOD vs COIN vs SOFI vs SCHW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HYPD vs HOOD vs COIN vs SOFI vs SCHW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories
SCHW leads 1 • HYPD leads 0 • COIN leads 0 • SOFI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCHW is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.0B annually — 75289.8x HYPD's $345,319. HOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HYPD's -73.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $345,319 | $4.5B | $7.2B | $4.8B | $26.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$23M | $2.2B | $202M | $760M | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | $1.9B | $801M | $481M | $8.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | $2.2B | $2.8B | -$2.6B | $9.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +83.3% | +74.6% | +75.1% | +75.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -97.0% | +46.8% | +20.0% | +11.0% | +29.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -73.9% | +42.1% | +17.6% | +10.1% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -180.5% | +36.3% | +33.8% | -83.5% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +185.2% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +121.0% | +2.7% | -7.2% | -56.7% | +41.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SOFI and SCHW each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.9x trailing earnings, SCHW trades at a 31% valuation discount to COIN's 43.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOOD offers better value at 0.14x vs SCHW's 13.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $68.7B | $51.0B | $20.4B | $159.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $79.9B | $47.5B | $17.3B | $162.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | 37.21x | 43.36x | 41.03x | 29.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.47x | 66.07x | 26.45x | 14.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.14x | 0.86x | — | 13.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 36.63x | 29.25x | 22.75x | 17.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 51.87x | 15.36x | 7.10x | 4.28x | 6.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.66x | 3.75x | 1.91x | 3.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 42.34x | 21.00x | — | 77.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HOOD and SCHW each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCHW delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-120 for HYPD. SOFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOOD's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCHW scores 7/9 vs HYPD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -119.6% | +21.4% | +5.7% | +5.9% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -68.9% | +4.7% | +2.8% | +1.1% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.7% | +7.9% | +5.7% | +3.6% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.2% | +24.0% | +8.1% | +1.2% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.68x | 0.53x | 0.17x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | $11.1B | -$3.5B | -$3.1B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $4.3B | $11.3B | $4.9B | $42.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $15.4B | $7.8B | $1.8B | $45.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.69x | 97.05x | 16.97x | 0.45x | 3.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth $21,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,525 for HYPD. Over the past 12 months, HOOD leads with a +52.6% total return vs HYPD's -54.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 104.6% vs HYPD's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.3% | -33.8% | -18.4% | -41.7% | -11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.8% | +52.6% | -1.8% | +23.0% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.8% | +756.1% | +232.1% | +192.5% | +94.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.8% | +119.1% | -26.8% | -3.1% | +31.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.8% | +119.1% | -41.2% | +52.7% | +255.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.2% | +104.6% | +49.2% | +43.0% | +24.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SCHW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCHW is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HYPD's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCHW currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs HYPD's 20.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.93x | 3.05x | 3.17x | 2.54x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.18 | $153.86 | $444.65 | $32.73 | $107.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.76 | $48.32 | $139.36 | $12.56 | $83.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.8% | +49.6% | +43.4% | +48.9% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 51.0 | 53.9 | 41.9 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 393K | 29.4M | 10.8M | 65.8M | 9.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOOD as "Buy", COIN as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", SCHW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for HOOD (target: $117) vs 26.1% for COIN (target: $243). SCHW is the only dividend payer here at 1.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $117.14 | $243.33 | $20.89 | $119.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 37 | 27 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.6% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
HOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SCHW leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
HYPD vs HOOD vs COIN vs SOFI vs SCHW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyperion DeFi, Inc.
(HYPD) is the stronger pick with 1414% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) offers the better valuation at 29. 9x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW?
On trailing P/E, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the cheapest at 29.
9x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, The Charles Schwab Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Robinhood Markets, Inc. wins at 0. 16x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW?
Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) delivered a total return of +119. 1%, compared to -54. 8% for Hyperion DeFi, Inc. (HYPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCHW returned +255. 2% versus HYPD's -54. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Hyperion DeFi, Inc. 's 3. 93β — meaning HYPD is approximately 442% more volatile than SCHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyperion DeFi, Inc.
(HYPD) is pulling ahead at 1414% versus 1. 9% for The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Robinhood Markets, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -53. 1% for Coinbase Global, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW?
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -868. 9% for Hyperion DeFi, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOOD leads at 46. 8% versus -850. 0% for HYPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOOD leads at 83. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 66. 1x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 51. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 53. 6% to $117. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW?
In this comparison, SCHW (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. HYPD, HOOD, COIN, SOFI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HYPD or HOOD or COIN or SOFI or SCHW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 1. 4% yield, +255. 2% 10Y return). Hyperion DeFi, Inc. (HYPD) carries a higher beta of 3. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCHW: +255. 2%, HYPD: -54. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HYPD and HOOD and COIN and SOFI and SCHW?
These companies operate in different sectors (HYPD (Healthcare) and HOOD (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services) and SOFI (Financial Services) and SCHW (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HYPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SCHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SCHW pays a dividend while HYPD, HOOD, COIN, SOFI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.