Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IAUX vs CAT vs DE vs EXK vs CNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Other Precious Metals
Agricultural - Machinery
IAUX vs CAT vs DE vs EXK vs CNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Other Precious Metals | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $416.75B | $157.32B | $2.99B | $13.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $89M | $70.75B | $45.88B | $330M | $18.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-175M | $9.42B | $4.08B | $-94M | $386M |
| Gross Margin | -10.9% | 32.5% | 34.7% | 9.3% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | -98.7% | 16.6% | 17.0% | -1.7% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.8x | 32.5x | 14.3x | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $175M | $43.33B | $63.94B | $120M | $27.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $106M | $3.23B |
IAUX vs CAT vs DE vs EXK vs CNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 392.7 | +292.7% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 156.5 | +56.5% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 192.2 | +92.2% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IAUX vs CAT vs DE vs EXK vs CNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IAUX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth 20.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
- 77.2% revenue growth vs CNH's -8.8%
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.7%
- PEG 1.38 vs DE's 1.99
- PEG 1.38 vs 1.99
- 13.3% margin vs IAUX's -195.9%
DE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56 vs EXK's 1.71
EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +193.4% vs CNH's -9.1%
CNH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.15, yield 2.5%, current ratio 7.75x
- 2.5% yield, vs DE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.2% revenue growth vs CNH's -8.8% | |
| Value | PEG 1.38 vs 1.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs IAUX's -195.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs EXK's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs DE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +193.4% vs CNH's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs IAUX's -26.0%, ROIC 15.9% vs -13.6% |
IAUX vs CAT vs DE vs EXK vs CNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IAUX vs CAT vs DE vs EXK vs CNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
CNH leads 1 • IAUX leads 0 • DE leads 0 • EXK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 793.5x IAUX's $89M. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IAUX's -195.9%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $89M | $70.8B | $45.9B | $330M | $18.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$84M | $14.0B | $9.5B | $49M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$175M | $9.4B | $4.1B | -$94M | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | $11.4B | $5.5B | -$129M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +32.5% | +34.7% | +9.3% | +31.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -98.7% | +16.6% | +17.0% | -1.7% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -195.9% | +13.3% | +8.9% | -28.4% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.6% | +16.2% | +12.0% | -39.1% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.3% | +22.2% | +16.3% | +154.0% | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.8% | +30.2% | -24.1% | -97.5% | -94.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CNH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.4x trailing earnings, CNH trades at a 44% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAT offers better value at 1.69x vs DE's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $416.8B | $157.3B | $3.0B | $13.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $450.1B | $213.0B | $3.0B | $37.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.52x | 47.57x | 31.37x | -78.08x | 26.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.79x | 32.53x | 14.34x | 26.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 1.92x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.41x | 20.01x | 76.02x | 10.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.04x | 6.17x | 3.52x | 13.72x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.89x | 19.71x | 6.06x | 5.07x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 40.56x | 48.69x | — | 6.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-49 for IAUX. EXK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNH scores 6/9 vs EXK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.8% | +47.5% | +15.5% | -18.4% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.0% | +10.0% | +3.9% | -9.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.6% | +15.9% | +7.7% | +1.5% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +19.1% | +11.4% | +1.6% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 0.25x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $111M | $33.4B | $55.7B | $14M | $23.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $106M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $175M | $43.3B | $63.9B | $120M | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.19x | 9.22x | 2.74x | -39.17x | 1.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,270 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, EXK leads with a +193.4% total return vs CNH's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs IAUX's -15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | +50.2% | +24.7% | +12.5% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +142.2% | +181.5% | +24.2% | +193.4% | -9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | +324.9% | +57.4% | +144.0% | -19.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | +282.5% | +54.1% | +61.1% | -27.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.4% | +1227.6% | +671.0% | +182.7% | +87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.5% | +62.0% | +16.3% | +34.6% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs IAUX's 66.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 1.54x | 0.56x | 1.71x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.24 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $15.15 | $14.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $318.11 | $433.00 | $3.14 | $9.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.5% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +67.0% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 76.2 | 54.0 | 47.6 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17.1M | 2.4M | 1.2M | 9.4M | 15.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAT and DE and CNH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IAUX as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", EXK as "Buy", CNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.6% upside for EXK (target: $13) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, CNH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $824.80 | $680.54 | $12.75 | $13.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 53 | 46 | 14 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +1.1% | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 | $6.33 | — | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IAUX vs CAT vs DE vs EXK vs CNH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, i-80 Gold Corp.
(IAUX) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (26. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH?
On trailing P/E, CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Endeavour Silver Corp. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 38x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to -27. 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus IAUX's -28. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 204% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), i-80 Gold Corp.
(IAUX) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: i-80 Gold Corp. grew EPS 20. 6% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IAUX leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus -195. 9% for i-80 Gold Corp. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus -98. 7% for IAUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 38x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXK: 25. 6% to $12. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH?
In this comparison, CNH (2.
5% yield), DE (1. 1% yield), CAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. IAUX, EXK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IAUX or CAT or DE or EXK or CNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IAUX and CAT and DE and EXK and CNH?
These companies operate in different sectors (IAUX (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and EXK (Basic Materials) and CNH (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IAUX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CAT, DE, CNH pay a dividend while IAUX, EXK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.