Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ICCM vs HALO vs ALNY vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
ICCM vs HALO vs ALNY vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $351M | $8.49B | $40.51B | $2.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $1.51B | $4.29B | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $349M | $577M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 76.9% | 80.9% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -8.4% | 57.0% | 17.5% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.8x | 40.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $217K | $2.14B | $1.28B | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $134M | $1.66B | $103M |
ICCM vs HALO vs ALNY vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IceCure Medical Ltd (ICCM) | 100 | 49.0 | -51.0% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 170.5 | +70.5% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 150.7 | +50.7% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 13.4 | -86.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICCM vs HALO vs ALNY vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICCM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +406.8% vs ALNY's -0.5%
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.63
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 318.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 4.66x
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 4.66x
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 65.2% revenue growth vs ICCM's 2.7%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs ICCM's 2.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.1% margin vs ICCM's -441.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs NVCR's 2.24 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +406.8% vs ALNY's -0.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs ICCM's -119.1%, ROIC 32.1% vs -135.6% |
ICCM vs HALO vs ALNY vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ICCM vs HALO vs ALNY vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICCM leads 1 • ALNY leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HALO and ALNY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 1202.5x ICCM's $4M. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICCM's -4.4%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $1.5B | $4.3B | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$29M | $961M | $677M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $349M | $577M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $668M | $641M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +76.9% | +80.9% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +57.0% | +17.5% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +23.1% | +13.5% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +44.3% | +15.0% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.7% | +42.2% | +96.4% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +31.2% | +4.4% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.0x trailing earnings, HALO trades at a 79% valuation discount to ALNY's 130.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 72.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $351M | $8.5B | $40.5B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $342M | $10.5B | $40.1B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.75x | 27.97x | 130.32x | -14.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.83x | 40.52x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.61x | 72.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 103.91x | 6.08x | 10.91x | 3.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 36.67x | 181.74x | 51.82x | 5.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.18x | 87.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 126.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $126 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ICCM. ICCM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HALO's 43.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs ICCM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +126.3% | +98.3% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -119.1% | +14.7% | +11.8% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -135.6% | +32.1% | +33.4% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -187.2% | +38.2% | +15.3% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 43.89x | 1.62x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | $2.0B | -$379M | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $134M | $1.7B | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $217,000 | $2.1B | $1.3B | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -313.68x | 44.97x | 2.02x | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ICCM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $20,854 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, ICCM leads with a +406.8% total return vs ALNY's -0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ICCM at 68.6% vs NVCR's -39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +728.6% | +1.8% | -24.1% | +37.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +406.8% | +33.0% | -0.5% | +7.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +378.9% | +116.6% | +57.9% | -78.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | +81.4% | +108.5% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | +653.7% | +318.2% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.6% | +29.4% | +16.4% | -39.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HALO and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs ALNY's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 0.63x | 0.64x | 2.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.69 | $82.22 | $495.55 | $19.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.13 | $51.06 | $283.10 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +87.1% | +61.3% | +93.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 23.1 | 57.2 | 45.3 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.5M | 979K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HALO as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.2% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 4.7% for HALO (target: $75).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.00 | $445.67 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 52 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ICCM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ICCM vs HALO vs ALNY vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for IceCure Medical Ltd (ICCM). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 28. 0x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR?
On trailing P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the cheapest at 28. 0x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 130. 3x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +108. 5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +653. 7% versus ICCM's -52. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 24β — meaning NVCR is approximately 257% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IceCure Medical Ltd (ICCM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 44% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus 2. 7% for IceCure Medical Ltd (ICCM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -445. 6% for IceCure Medical Ltd — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -446. 7% for ICCM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALNY leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 40. 5x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 31. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 86. 2% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ICCM or HALO or ALNY or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +653. 7% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +653. 7%, NVCR: +51. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICCM and HALO and ALNY and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICCM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.