Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IDN vs NVDA vs AMD vs AUID vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Software - Infrastructure
Semiconductors
IDN vs NVDA vs AMD vs AUID vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $157M | $5.14T | $665.93B | $17M | $213.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $215.94B | $37.45B | $2M | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $120.07B | $4.99B | $-18M | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.1% | 50.3% | 96.5% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 60.4% | 11.7% | -10.2% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 75.2x | 25.6x | 59.7x | — | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $11.41B | $4.47B | $241K | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $10.61B | $5.54B | $8M | $7.84B |
IDN vs NVDA vs AMD vs AUID vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) | 100 | 92.8 | -7.2% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1057.5 | +957.5% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 434.9 | +334.9% |
| authID Inc. (AUID) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 141.7 | +41.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IDN vs NVDA vs AMD vs AUID vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IDN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, current ratio 3.68x
- Beta 0.41 vs AMD's 2.30
NVDA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs AMD's 110.9%
- PEG 0.27 vs AMD's 11.55
- 55.6% margin vs AUID's -10.1%
AMD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +307.0% vs AUID's -79.9%
AUID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 365.9% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0%
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
- Better valuation composite
- 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 365.9% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs AUID's -10.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs AMD's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +307.0% vs AUID's -79.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs AUID's -145.1%, ROIC 81.8% vs -337.3% |
IDN vs NVDA vs AMD vs AUID vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IDN vs NVDA vs AMD vs AUID vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
QCOM leads 2 • IDN leads 0 • AMD leads 0 • AUID leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA and IDN operate at a comparable scale, with $215.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUID's -10.1%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $215.9B | $37.5B | $2M | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $133.2B | $6.6B | -$19M | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $120.1B | $5.0B | -$18M | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $96.7B | $8.6B | -$15M | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +71.1% | +50.3% | +96.5% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +60.4% | +11.7% | -10.2% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +55.6% | +13.3% | -10.1% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +44.8% | +22.9% | -8.2% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +73.2% | +37.8% | -142.6% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.3% | +97.8% | +90.9% | -22.6% | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 74% valuation discount to AMD's 154.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs AMD's 29.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $157M | $5.14T | $665.9B | $17M | $213.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $148M | $5.14T | $664.9B | $8M | $222.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 43.16x | 154.14x | -0.89x | 40.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 75.22x | 25.55x | 59.65x | — | 18.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 29.84x | — | 19.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 72.52x | 38.59x | 99.26x | — | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 23.80x | 19.22x | 18.80x | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.59x | 32.85x | 10.61x | 1.10x | 10.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.01x | 53.17x | 98.88x | — | 16.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-180 for AUID. AUID carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs AUID's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | +76.3% | +8.1% | -180.2% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +58.1% | +6.5% | -145.1% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +81.8% | +4.7% | -3.4% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +97.2% | +5.7% | -116.3% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x | 0.07x | 0.02x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $807M | -$1.1B | -$8M | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $10.6B | $5.5B | $8M | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $11.4B | $4.5B | $240,884 | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 545.03x | 33.19x | -670.14x | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $163 for AUID. Over the past 12 months, AMD leads with a +307.0% total return vs AUID's -79.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs AUID's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.5% | +12.0% | +82.8% | +26.9% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +193.2% | +80.7% | +307.0% | -79.9% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.4% | +625.9% | +329.8% | -60.0% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | +1328.9% | +418.3% | -98.4% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +322.3% | +23902.3% | +11090.7% | -98.4% | +350.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.7% | +93.6% | +62.6% | -26.3% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IDN and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMD's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs AUID's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 1.73x | 2.30x | 1.59x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.07 | $216.80 | $430.57 | $6.83 | $223.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.60 | $112.28 | $96.88 | $0.84 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +97.6% | +94.9% | +18.2% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 60.7 | 81.2 | 50.0 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 384K | 164.5M | 36.4M | 229K | 15.1M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IDN as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NVDA (target: $279) vs -23.9% for AMD (target: $311). QCOM is the only dividend payer here at 1.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | $278.83 | $310.86 | — | $175.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 79 | 70 | — | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | — | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
IDN vs NVDA vs AMD vs AUID vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, authID Inc.
(AUID) is the stronger pick with 365. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 40. 4x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 40.
4x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 154. 1x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 18. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -98.
4% for authID Inc. (AUID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus AUID's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning AMD is approximately 458% more volatile than IDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, authID Inc. (AUID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), authID Inc.
(AUID) is pulling ahead at 365. 9% versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -1610. 6% for authID Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -1656. 5% for AUID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUID leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 75. 2x for Intellicheck, Inc. — 56. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 31. 8% to $278. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. IDN, NVDA, AMD, AUID do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IDN or NVDA or AMD or AUID or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +322. 3% 10Y return). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDN: +322. 3%, AMD: +110. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IDN and NVDA and AMD and AUID and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IDN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; AUID is a small-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM pays a dividend while IDN, NVDA, AMD, AUID do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.