Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IDYA vs PRAX vs FOLD vs CRL vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
IDYA vs PRAX vs FOLD vs CRL vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $2.48B | $9.63B | $4.55B | $8.98B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $225M | $-92K | $634M | $4.03B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-140M | $-327M | $-27M | $-185M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 97.1% | — | 87.9% | 24.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -81.4% | — | 5.2% | 11.8% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 40.6x | 16.4x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $110K | $483M | $3.07B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $357M | $214M | $214M | $1.98B |
IDYA vs PRAX vs FOLD vs CRL vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDEAYA Biosciences,… (IDYA) | 100 | 232.0 | +132.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 79.9 | -20.1% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IDYA vs PRAX vs FOLD vs CRL vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IDYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.2%, EPS growth 61.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 62.5%
- 152.4% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 11.34x
- 30.2% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5%
FOLD is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.63 vs PRAX's 1.55
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.4x)
- 8.3% margin vs IDYA's -62.2%
- 4.7% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs -65.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.2% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs IDYA's -62.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs -65.0% |
IDYA vs PRAX vs FOLD vs CRL vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IDYA vs PRAX vs FOLD vs CRL vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 4 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • FOLD leads 1 • IDYA leads 0 • CRL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IDYA's -62.2%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $225M | -$92,000 | $634M | $4.0B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$180M | -$357M | $40M | $757M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$140M | -$327M | -$27M | -$185M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$283M | $30M | $391M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.1% | — | +87.9% | +24.9% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -81.4% | — | +5.2% | +11.8% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -62.2% | — | -4.3% | -4.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | — | +4.7% | +9.7% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +23.7% | +1.2% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.4% | +2.7% | -89.0% | -160.0% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $9.6B | $4.5B | $9.0B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $9.3B | $4.8B | $11.8B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.06x | -24.72x | -164.85x | -62.52x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 40.62x | 16.42x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 114.88x | 12.98x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.34x | — | 7.17x | 2.24x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.44x | 8.54x | 16.29x | 2.81x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 152.43x | 17.31x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDYA scores 4/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.0% | -43.0% | -12.0% | -5.7% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.8% | -40.2% | -3.2% | -2.5% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.4% | -65.0% | +5.3% | +6.3% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.0% | -49.3% | +5.1% | +8.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.00x | 1.76x | 0.95x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$85M | -$357M | $269M | $2.9B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $357M | $214M | $214M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $110,000 | $483M | $3.1B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 1.00x | 6.38x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $14,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,311 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.6% | +16.4% | +1.5% | -10.1% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.4% | +775.0% | +137.9% | +32.8% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.4% | +1976.5% | +19.0% | -4.2% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.2% | -20.8% | +48.6% | -46.9% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.4% | -20.1% | +119.2% | +119.2% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.3% | +174.9% | +6.0% | -1.4% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs IDYA's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 1.55x | 0.63x | 1.52x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.28 | $356.00 | $14.50 | $228.88 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.82 | $35.18 | $5.51 | $131.30 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +93.6% | +99.9% | +79.5% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 55.6 | 72.2 | 57.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 378K | 3.0M | 806K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IDYA as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.8% upside for IDYA (target: $59) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.67 | $544.40 | $14.50 | $205.43 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 16 | 24 | 36 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns).
IDYA vs PRAX vs FOLD vs CRL vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.
(IDYA) is the stronger pick with 30. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. (IDYA) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV?
On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to -46. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +166. 5% versus PRAX's -20. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 145% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.
(IDYA) is pulling ahead at 30. 2% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS 61. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDYA leads at 62. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -52. 0% for IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -72. 8% for IDYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDYA leads at 97. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 26. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDYA: 107. 8% to $58. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IDYA or PRAX or FOLD or CRL or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IDYA and PRAX and FOLD and CRL and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IDYA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.