Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IGIC vs MKL vs RNR vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Diversified
IGIC vs MKL vs RNR vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $22.52B | $12.98B | $33.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $528M | $16.57B | $11.49B | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $127M | $1.77B | $3.09B | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | 47.9% | 61.4% | 44.6% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 24.1% | 13.9% | 35.5% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 16.0x | 7.7x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $4.30B | $2.33B | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $186M | $3.96B | $1.73B | $993M |
IGIC vs MKL vs RNR vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Gener… (IGIC) | 100 | 439.2 | +339.2% |
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IGIC vs MKL vs RNR vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IGIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.23 vs MKL's 0.64
- 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MKL's 2.7%
- 6.3% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 18.6% vs 10.7%
MKL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 2.7%
RNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 60.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.2%
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
- +21.9% vs MKL's -4.1%
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 324.0% 10Y total return vs IGIC's 215.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.21x
- 14.3% revenue growth vs IGIC's -1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs IGIC's -1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs IGIC's 0.52 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MKL's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs MKL's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 18.6% vs 10.7% |
IGIC vs MKL vs RNR vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IGIC vs MKL vs RNR vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RNR leads in 3 of 6 categories
IGIC leads 2 • MKL leads 0 • ACGL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 37.7x IGIC's $528M. RNR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKL's 10.7%. On growth, ACGL holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $528M | $16.6B | $11.5B | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $2.5B | $4.1B | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $127M | $1.8B | $3.1B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $2.2B | $4.2B | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.9% | +61.4% | +44.6% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +13.9% | +35.5% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +10.7% | +26.9% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +13.2% | +36.7% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +6.7% | -36.4% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.9% | -2.6% | +100.9% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 50% valuation discount to MKL's 10.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RNR offers better value at 0.18x vs MKL's 0.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $22.5B | $13.0B | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $922M | $22.9B | $13.6B | $35.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.95x | 10.64x | 5.31x | 8.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.57x | 15.99x | 7.66x | 10.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | 0.43x | 0.18x | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.25x | 7.78x | 3.38x | 6.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.15x | 1.36x | 1.02x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 1.20x | 0.70x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.34x | 8.82x | 3.51x | 5.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IGIC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $10 for MKL. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKL's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs IGIC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.8% | +9.6% | +16.6% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | +3.0% | +5.7% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.6% | +10.7% | +16.0% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.0% | +14.9% | +10.7% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.23x | 0.12x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$186M | $339M | $598M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $186M | $4.0B | $1.7B | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4.3B | $2.3B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 12.00x | 33.28x | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IGIC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IGIC five years ago would be worth $33,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,749 for MKL. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs MKL's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IGIC at 51.8% vs ACGL's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.2% | -15.5% | +10.6% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.8% | -4.1% | +21.9% | +2.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.9% | +31.0% | +45.7% | +30.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.3% | +47.5% | +87.1% | +144.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.8% | +89.3% | +176.9% | +324.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.8% | +9.4% | +13.4% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IGIC's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs MKL's 81.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.44x | -0.03x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.43 | $2207.59 | $318.20 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.82 | $1719.41 | $231.17 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +81.5% | +94.5% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 34.5 | 46.9 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 59K | 303K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IGIC and MKL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IGIC as "Buy", MKL as "Hold", RNR as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for ACGL (target: $104) vs -26.6% for IGIC (target: $19). For income investors, IGIC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $1950.00 | $308.33 | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 15 | 28 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +2.7% | +0.6% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.06 | $48.55 | $1.67 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +1.9% | +12.3% | +5.6% |
RNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IGIC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
IGIC vs MKL vs RNR vs ACGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (IGIC). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (IGIC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL?
On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Markel Corporation at 10. 6x. On forward P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 23x versus Markel Corporation's 0. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, International General Insurance Holdings Ltd.
(IGIC) delivered a total return of +239. 3%, compared to +47. 5% for Markel Corporation (MKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +324. 0% versus MKL's +89. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. 's 0. 52β — meaning IGIC is approximately -1742% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 23% for Markel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -1. 8% for International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (IGIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 60. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL?
International General Insurance Holdings Ltd.
(IGIC) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 6% net margin versus 12. 7% for Markel Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNR leads at 31. 5% versus 16. 5% for MKL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (IGIC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Markel Corporation's 0. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Markel Corporation — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACGL: 10. 0% to $104. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL?
In this comparison, IGIC (4.
1% yield), MKL (2. 7% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ACGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IGIC or MKL or RNR or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, MKL: +89. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IGIC and MKL and RNR and ACGL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
IGIC, MKL, RNR pay a dividend while ACGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.