Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IMG vs MVIS vs VUZI vs KOPN vs MAXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Consumer Electronics
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Solar
IMG vs MVIS vs VUZI vs KOPN vs MAXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Consumer Electronics | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $479K | $189M | $232M | $755M | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23K | $1M | $5M | $46M | $176M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-95M | $-32.28B | $-6M | $-565M |
| Gross Margin | 67.7% | -14.4% | -0.0% | 26.1% | -137.2% |
| Operating Margin | -164.5% | -57.4% | -5.2% | -26.6% | -290.5% |
| Total Debt | $3M | $37M | $1.00B | $2M | $311M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464K | $32M | $21.15B | $14M | $29M |
IMG vs MVIS vs VUZI vs KOPN vs MAXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIMG Inc. (IMG) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 77.3 | -22.7% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 247.0 | +147.0% |
| Kopin Corporation (KOPN) | 100 | 283.3 | +183.3% |
| Maxeon Solar Techno… (MAXN) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMG vs MVIS vs VUZI vs KOPN vs MAXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MVIS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.61, current ratio 2.69x
VUZI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.40, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 5.56x
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
- 10.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
KOPN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 183.5% 10Y total return vs VUZI's -35.7%
- -13.5% margin vs IMG's -117.8%
- +265.2% vs MAXN's -83.1%
- -9.5% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC -172.3% vs -10.7%
MAXN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.08
- Beta 2.08 vs KOPN's 3.50
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.5% margin vs IMG's -117.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.08 vs KOPN's 3.50 | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +265.2% vs MAXN's -83.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.5% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC -172.3% vs -10.7% |
IMG vs MVIS vs VUZI vs KOPN vs MAXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IMG vs MVIS vs VUZI vs KOPN vs MAXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KOPN leads in 2 of 6 categories
MVIS leads 1 • VUZI leads 1 • IMG leads 0 • MAXN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KOPN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $176M annually — 7719.5x IMG's $22,853. KOPN is the more profitable business, keeping -13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMG's -117.8%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22,853 | $1M | $5M | $46M | $176M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$64M | -$30.9B | -$11M | -$488M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$95M | -$32.3B | -$6M | -$565M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | -$59M | -$20.8B | -$11M | -$186M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.7% | -14.4% | -0.0% | +26.1% | -137.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -164.5% | -57.4% | -5.2% | -26.6% | -2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -117.8% | -78.6% | -5.1% | -13.5% | -3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1444.7% | -49.2% | -3.3% | -24.3% | -105.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -86.5% | +4933.1% | -10.2% | -89.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.3% | +14.3% | +25.0% | +186.7% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VUZI and KOPN and MAXN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $479,083 | $189M | $232M | $755M | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $193M | -$19.9B | $743M | $291M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | -1.76x | -6.81x | -14.61x | -0.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 156.30x | 0.04x | 15.00x | 0.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.03x | 0.01x | 27.51x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MVIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMG delivers a -25.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. VUZI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVIS's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MVIS scores 3/9 vs IMG's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.4% | -137.4% | -5.2% | -30.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | -74.3% | -3.2% | -9.5% | -190.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.4% | -98.3% | -10.7% | -172.3% | -3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.6% | -93.6% | -184.6% | -143.1% | -189.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.66x | 0.04x | 0.09x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $4M | -$20.1B | -$12M | $283M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464,222 | $32M | $21.2B | $14M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $37M | $1.0B | $2M | $311M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1432.74x | -3.54x | — | — | -13.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KOPN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KOPN five years ago would be worth $6,292 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for MAXN. Over the past 12 months, KOPN leads with a +265.2% total return vs MAXN's -83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOPN at 69.2% vs MAXN's -94.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.6% | -30.8% | -25.7% | +93.6% | -84.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.9% | -45.5% | +63.4% | +265.2% | -83.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.2% | -73.6% | -29.6% | +384.4% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.2% | -95.6% | -84.8% | -37.1% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.2% | -66.2% | -35.7% | +183.5% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.7% | -35.8% | -11.0% | +69.2% | -94.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KOPN and MAXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAXN is the less volatile stock with a 2.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KOPN's 3.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KOPN currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs IMG's 8.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.40x | 2.61x | 3.40x | 3.50x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.70 | $1.73 | $4.29 | $5.04 | $4.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.12 | $0.51 | $1.71 | $1.23 | $0.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.3% | +35.6% | +66.7% | +95.6% | +9.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.3 | 50.3 | 61.1 | 82.3 | 25.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 5.3M | 924K | 5.4M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
VUZI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MVIS as "Buy", VUZI as "Buy", KOPN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 711.7% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs 3.7% for KOPN (target: $5). VUZI is the only dividend payer here at 10.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | $6.00 | $5.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 5 | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +10.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 3 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.29 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
KOPN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MVIS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
IMG vs MVIS vs VUZI vs KOPN vs MAXN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMG or MVIS or VUZI or KOPN or MAXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Analysts rate MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMG or MVIS or VUZI or KOPN or MAXN?
Over the past 5 years, Kopin Corporation (KOPN) delivered a total return of -37.
1%, compared to -100. 0% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOPN returned +183. 5% versus MAXN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMG or MVIS or VUZI or KOPN or MAXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.
(MAXN) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 08β versus Kopin Corporation's 3. 50β — meaning KOPN is approximately 69% more volatile than MAXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 66% for MicroVision, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IMG or MVIS or VUZI or KOPN or MAXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CIMG Inc. grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1276. 5% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMG or MVIS or VUZI or KOPN or MAXN?
Kopin Corporation (KOPN) is the more profitable company, earning -87.
2% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps -87. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KOPN leads at -85. 6% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KOPN leads at 20. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IMG or MVIS or VUZI or KOPN or MAXN?
In this comparison, VUZI (10.
1% yield) pays a dividend. IMG, MVIS, KOPN, MAXN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is IMG or MVIS or VUZI or KOPN or MAXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (10.
1% yield). Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VUZI: -35. 7%, MAXN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IMG and MVIS and VUZI and KOPN and MAXN?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMG (Consumer Defensive) and MVIS (Technology) and VUZI (Technology) and KOPN (Technology) and MAXN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; KOPN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MAXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. VUZI pays a dividend while IMG, MVIS, KOPN, MAXN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.