Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IMKTA vs PTLO vs PFGC vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
IMKTA vs PTLO vs PFGC vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Restaurants | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $315M | $14.57B | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.40B | $738M | $66.75B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104M | $16M | $329M | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 29.0% | 11.9% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 6.1% | 1.2% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 19.5x | 20.3x | 19.9x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $544M | $999M | $8.00B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $20M | $79M | $1.07B |
IMKTA vs PTLO vs PFGC vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingles Markets, Inc… (IMKTA) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
| Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) | 100 | 11.5 | -88.5% |
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 205.0 | +105.0% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 94.8 | -5.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMKTA vs PTLO vs PFGC vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMKTA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 33.6%, current ratio 3.22x
- Beta 0.36, yield 0.8%, current ratio 3.22x
- Beta 0.36 vs PTLO's 1.35, lower leverage
- +41.6% vs PTLO's -61.4%
PTLO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 2.1% margin vs PFGC's 0.5%
PFGC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 249.2% 10Y total return vs IMKTA's 125.9%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4%
SYY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 19.9x)
- 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs IMKTA's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 6.4% ROA vs PTLO's 1.0%, ROIC 15.7% vs 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs PFGC's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs PTLO's 1.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs IMKTA's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.6% vs PTLO's -61.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs PTLO's 1.0%, ROIC 15.7% vs 3.0% |
IMKTA vs PTLO vs PFGC vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMKTA vs PTLO vs PFGC vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMKTA leads in 3 of 6 categories
PFGC leads 1 • SYY leads 1 • PTLO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMKTA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 113.2x PTLO's $738M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.1% (PTLO) to 0.5% (PFGC). On growth, PFGC holds the edge at +6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $738M | $66.7B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34.7B | $75M | $1.0B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104M | $16M | $329M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $69.3B | -$9M | $1.0B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +29.0% | +11.9% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +6.1% | +1.2% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +2.1% | +0.5% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | -1.2% | +1.5% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.8% | +3.5% | +6.4% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.0% | -111.2% | -27.0% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTLO and SYY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, PTLO trades at a 62% valuation discount to PFGC's 42.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMKTA's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTLO's 16.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $315M | $14.6B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1.3B | $22.5B | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.50x | 16.15x | 42.53x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.34x | 19.88x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.51x | 16.11x | 14.65x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.43x | 0.23x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 0.62x | 3.24x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 41.15x | — | 20.69x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMKTA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $3 for PTLO. IMKTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMKTA scores 7/9 vs PTLO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +3.2% | +7.1% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +1.0% | +1.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +3.0% | +5.7% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +3.7% | +7.1% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 2.01x | 1.79x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $177M | $980M | $7.9B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $20M | $79M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $544M | $999M | $8.0B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.36x | 1.78x | 1.69x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFGC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFGC five years ago would be worth $16,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,498 for PTLO. Over the past 12 months, IMKTA leads with a +41.6% total return vs PTLO's -61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFGC at 14.9% vs PTLO's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.6% | -5.0% | +5.3% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.6% | -61.4% | +11.8% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.6% | -78.4% | +51.6% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.6% | -85.0% | +69.7% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.9% | -85.0% | +249.2% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.5% | -40.0% | +14.9% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
IMKTA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMKTA is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PTLO's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMKTA currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs PTLO's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 1.35x | 0.60x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.62 | $13.55 | $109.05 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.09 | $4.27 | $77.44 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.7% | +32.2% | +85.0% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 31.9 | 59.3 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 1.5M | 1.7M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTLO as "Hold", PFGC as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.7% upside for PTLO (target: $7) vs 20.5% for PFGC (target: $112). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs IMKTA's 0.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.92 | $111.75 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 25 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | — | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +3.6% |
IMKTA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFGC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
IMKTA vs PTLO vs PFGC vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is the stronger pick with 8.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the cheapest at 16. 1x versus Performance Food Group Company at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) delivered a total return of +69.
7%, compared to -85. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFGC returned +249. 2% versus PTLO's -85. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Portillo's Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning PTLO is approximately 277% more volatile than IMKTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is pulling ahead at 8.
6% versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sysco Corporation grew EPS -4. 1% year-over-year, compared to -41. 3% for Portillo's Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTLO leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY?
Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus 0. 5% for Performance Food Group Company — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTLO leads at 7. 0% versus 1. 3% for PFGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTLO leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15.
9x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Portillo's Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PTLO: 58. 7% to $6. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), IMKTA (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PTLO, PFGC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMKTA or PTLO or PFGC or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36), 0. 8% yield, +125. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMKTA: +125. 9%, PTLO: -85. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMKTA and PTLO and PFGC and SYY?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMKTA (Consumer Defensive) and PTLO (Consumer Cyclical) and PFGC (Consumer Defensive) and SYY (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMKTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTLO is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFGC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. IMKTA, SYY pay a dividend while PTLO, PFGC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.