Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMO vs SU vs CVX vs CVE vs XOM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyAMEX • CA
Market Cap$62.57B
5Y Perf.+705.6%
SU
Suncor Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$75.67B
5Y Perf.+272.4%
CVX
Chevron Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$364.18B
5Y Perf.+99.0%
CVE
Cenovus Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$53.60B
5Y Perf.+557.3%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+222.2%

IMO vs SU vs CVX vs CVE vs XOM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMO logoIMO
SU logoSU
CVX logoCVX
CVE logoCVE
XOM logoXOM
IndustryOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$62.57B$75.67B$364.18B$53.60B$620.85B
Revenue (TTM)$47.04B$52.01B$184.43B$49.40B$323.90B
Net Income (TTM)$3.27B$6.33B$12.30B$4.64B$28.84B
Gross Margin21.2%55.5%30.4%19.6%21.7%
Operating Margin9.0%27.4%9.0%14.0%10.5%
Forward P/E15.0x7.7x15.0x7.5x14.8x
Total Debt$4.23B$18.37B$46.74B$17.00B$43.54B
Cash & Equiv.$1.14B$3.65B$6.47B$2.74B$10.68B

IMO vs SU vs CVX vs CVE vs XOMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMO
SU
CVX
CVE
XOM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Imperial Oil Limited (IMO)100805.6+705.6%
Suncor Energy Inc. (SU)100372.4+272.4%
Chevron Corporation (CVX)100199.0+99.0%
Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE)100657.3+557.3%
Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM)100322.2+222.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMO vs SU vs CVX vs CVE vs XOM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CVE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Suncor Energy Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. IMO and CVX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
The Long-Run Compounder

IMO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 337.2% 10Y total return vs SU's 197.4%
  • 8.1% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 12.3% vs 6.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
SU
Suncor Energy Inc.
The Growth Play

SU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth -3.5%, EPS growth 2.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.7%
  • -3.5% revenue growth vs CVE's -14.0%
  • 12.2% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
Best for: growth exposure
CVX
Chevron Corporation
The Income Pick

CVX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.05, yield 3.8%
  • 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs IMO's 1.6%
Best for: income & stability
CVE
Cenovus Energy Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 53.8%, current ratio 1.57x
  • Beta 0.22, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.57x
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 14.8x)
  • Beta 0.22 vs IMO's 0.25
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, XOM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSU logoSU-3.5% revenue growth vs CVE's -14.0%
ValueCVE logoCVELower P/E (7.5x vs 14.8x)
Quality / MarginsSU logoSU12.2% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
Stability / SafetyCVE logoCVEBeta 0.22 vs IMO's 0.25
DividendsCVX logoCVX3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs IMO's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)CVE logoCVE+147.0% vs CVX's +39.5%
Efficiency (ROA)IMO logoIMO8.1% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 12.3% vs 6.2%

IMO vs SU vs CVX vs CVE vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMOImperial Oil Limited
FY 2025
Downstream
75.0%$52.1B
Upstream
23.0%$15.9B
Chemical
2.0%$1.4B
SUSuncor Energy Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CVXChevron Corporation
FY 2025
Downstream
61.1%$72.5B
Upstream
38.4%$45.5B
All Other Segments
0.5%$644M
CVECenovus Energy Inc.
FY 2020
Upstream
100.0%$58M
XOMExxon Mobil Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Products
68.7%$217.8B
Upstream
17.6%$55.7B
Chemical Products
6.0%$18.9B
Specialty Products
5.4%$17.3B
Income From Equity Affiliates
1.7%$5.3B
Other Revenue
0.6%$2.1B

IMO vs SU vs CVX vs CVE vs XOM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSULAGGINGXOM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 6.9x IMO's $47.0B. SU is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVX's 6.7%. On growth, SU holds the edge at +25.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMO logoIMOImperial Oil Limi…SU logoSUSuncor Energy Inc.CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CVE logoCVECenovus Energy In…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$47.0B$52.0B$184.4B$49.4B$323.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6.8B$21.7B$37.1B$12.4B$59.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3.3B$6.3B$12.3B$4.6B$28.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.7B$7.2B$16.2B$4.4B$23.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.2%+55.5%+30.4%+19.6%+21.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.0%+27.4%+9.0%+14.0%+10.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.9%+12.2%+6.7%+9.4%+8.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.0%+13.9%+8.8%+8.8%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.7%+25.1%-5.3%-12.8%-1.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-57.8%+30.1%-24.5%+78.7%-11.0%
SU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.9x trailing earnings, SU trades at a 35% valuation discount to CVX's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SU's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IMO's 13.0x.

MetricIMO logoIMOImperial Oil Limi…SU logoSUSuncor Energy Inc.CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CVE logoCVECenovus Energy In…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$62.6B$75.7B$364.2B$53.6B$620.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$64.8B$86.5B$404.5B$64.1B$653.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS26.50x17.93x27.53x18.06x21.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.96x7.73x15.02x7.47x14.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.96x5.13x10.89x8.91x10.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.81x2.11x1.97x1.47x1.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.89x2.35x1.76x2.24x2.37x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.17x14.92x21.95x21.48x26.29x
SU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — IMO and SU each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

CVE delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $7 for CVX. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVE's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SU scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIMO logoIMOImperial Oil Limi…SU logoSUSuncor Energy Inc.CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CVE logoCVECenovus Energy In…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.7%+14.0%+7.2%+15.2%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.1%+7.0%+4.2%+7.8%+6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.3%+20.1%+6.2%+7.9%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.9%+19.5%+6.6%+8.2%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956563
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.19x0.41x0.24x0.54x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.1B$14.7B$40.3B$14.3B$32.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.1B$3.6B$6.5B$2.7B$10.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.2B$18.4B$46.7B$17.0B$43.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.68x17.22x11.80x69.44x
Evenly matched — IMO and SU each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMO five years ago would be worth $42,567 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,396 for CVX. Over the past 12 months, CVE leads with a +147.0% total return vs CVX's +39.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMO at 41.1% vs CVX's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMO logoIMOImperial Oil Limi…SU logoSUSuncor Energy Inc.CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CVE logoCVECenovus Energy In…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+42.0%+40.8%+18.2%+63.2%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+87.1%+92.7%+39.5%+147.0%+43.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+180.9%+128.8%+26.7%+85.3%+44.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+325.7%+201.0%+94.0%+286.8%+164.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+337.2%+197.4%+135.8%+118.2%+105.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+41.1%+31.8%+8.2%+22.8%+13.2%
IMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMO and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMO's 0.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMO currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMO logoIMOImperial Oil Limi…SU logoSUSuncor Energy Inc.CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CVE logoCVECenovus Energy In…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.25x-0.03x-0.05x0.22x-0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$134.32$70.29$214.71$30.84$176.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$67.50$33.50$133.77$11.60$101.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.7%+90.7%+85.0%+92.3%+83.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.748.742.163.042.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded663K4.6M11.0M13.1M18.9M
Evenly matched — IMO and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — IMO and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: IMO as "Hold", SU as "Buy", CVX as "Buy", CVE as "Hold", XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -64.2% for IMO (target: $45). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.76% vs IMO's 1.62%.

MetricIMO logoIMOImperial Oil Limi…SU logoSUSuncor Energy Inc.CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CVE logoCVECenovus Energy In…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$44.99$62.00$190.93$27.67$160.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts2031532755
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+2.6%+3.8%+2.0%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2748026
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.78$2.30$6.87$0.78$4.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.8%+3.0%+3.3%+3.4%+3.3%
Evenly matched — IMO and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallSuncor Energy Inc. (SU)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMO vs SU vs CVX vs CVE vs XOM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Suncor Energy Inc.

(SU) is the stronger pick with -3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 0% for Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE). Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM?

On trailing P/E, Suncor Energy Inc.

(SU) is the cheapest at 17. 9x versus Chevron Corporation at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, Cenovus Energy Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM?

Over the past 5 years, Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) delivered a total return of +325.

7%, compared to +94. 0% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMO returned +337. 2% versus XOM's +105. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Imperial Oil Limited's 0. 25β — meaning IMO is approximately -269% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 54% for Cenovus Energy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Suncor Energy Inc.

(SU) is pulling ahead at -3. 5% versus -14. 0% for Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cenovus Energy Inc. grew EPS 28. 7% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Chevron Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SU leads at -5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM?

Suncor Energy Inc.

(SU) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 1% net margin versus 6. 7% for Chevron Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SU leads at 31. 7% versus 8. 8% for CVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SU leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Cenovus Energy Inc.

(CVE) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Chevron Corporation — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 9. 5% to $160. 43.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Chevron Corporation (CVX) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 6% for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO).

09

Is IMO or SU or CVX or CVE or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, CVE: +118. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMO and SU and CVX and CVE and XOM?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IMO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; CVE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IMO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SU

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IMO and SU and CVX and CVE and XOM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IMO: 6.7% · SU: 25.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(IMO: 6.9% · SU: 12.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(IMO: 26.5x · SU: 17.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.